全部回帖
我的天,现在都有这么逆天的言论了?看看乔丹的这些防守选择,这叫没有进攻征兆?这是乔丹知道他根本投不进故意放空,慢悠悠跑过去不伸手直接下快攻,就笃定魔术师投不进
[图片]
[图片]
[图片]
[图片]
我的天,现在都有这么逆天的言论了?
看看乔丹的这些防守选择,这叫没有进攻征兆?
这是乔丹知道他根本投不进故意放空,慢悠悠跑过去不伸手直接下快攻,就笃定魔术师投不进
这又是另一个类型的球了
这不都是典型的inside out么
别说魔术师了,雷吉米勒都有大量这种因为inside out被放空的球
这又是另一个类型的球了
这不都是典型的inside out么
别说魔术师了,雷吉米勒都有大量这种因为inside out被放空的球
错啊,你啥逻辑,不是没有他俩资深就不能说,而是他俩更资深,说的人信服率更高同时你如果找出更大量的人和他们的言论不符,那你也可以说原则不是很简单,单人比资深,然后再看符合这个条件的大样本,这不是非常简单的事有啥逆天的,这是最公正标准的判断原则了
错啊,你啥逻辑,不是没有他俩资深就不能说,而是他俩更资深,说的人信服率更高
同时你如果找出更大量的人和他们的言论不符,那你也可以说
原则不是很简单,单人比资深,然后再看符合这个条件的大样本,这不是非常简单的事
有啥逆天的,这是最公正标准的判断原则了
以后比赛建议不用打,直接按评论员的资深程度赋分
以后比赛建议不用打,直接按评论员的资深程度赋分
大样本,所以你拿出一个教练的话?你统计过说乔丹goat的资深有几个?是只看一个最资深还是比较群体?不看技术统计不看荣誉,就爱看球员教练评论,这还不逆天
[图片]
大样本,所以你拿出一个教练的话?你统计过说乔丹goat的资深有几个?是只看一个最资深还是比较群体?不看技术统计不看荣誉,就爱看球员教练评论,这还不逆天
好多啊,B站以前有个专门统计这个言论的视频,现在不知道下架了么有
如果能翻墙,youtube上就有
另外,看技术统计的话,我前面已经给你列80年代和现在无论整体还是个人的情况了
有啥逆天的
好多啊,B站以前有个专门统计这个言论的视频,现在不知道下架了么有
如果能翻墙,youtube上就有
另外,看技术统计的话,我前面已经给你列80年代和现在无论整体还是个人的情况了
有啥逆天的
很简单的,在这里说半天,最终的目的就是说魔术师整个到底强不强的这个大课题,其他都是局部的东西这个大课题才是争论的核心。既然你要选乔丹的判断标准做为判断标准,为啥不认乔丹对魔术师这个整体大课题的判断呢因为本来讨论就是大课题,本来就是你自己像要通过局部的东西引申整体啊这不是非常明白的事
很简单的,在这里说半天,最终的目的就是说魔术师整个到底强不强的这个大课题,其他都是局部的东西
这个大课题才是争论的核心。
既然你要选乔丹的判断标准做为判断标准,为啥不认乔丹对魔术师这个整体大课题的判断呢
因为本来讨论就是大课题,本来就是你自己像要通过局部的东西引申整体啊
这不是非常明白的事
那更简单,一句话的事,乔丹比魔术师强多了,可以以他建队打出2个王朝
魔术师有个没投篮的致命伤,所以只适合做极品二当家,让他当第一核心,就会像89-91那样,带个沃西两次总决赛1胜8负,几乎俩光头,面对活塞公牛毫无还手之力
那更简单,一句话的事,乔丹比魔术师强多了,可以以他建队打出2个王朝
魔术师有个没投篮的致命伤,所以只适合做极品二当家,让他当第一核心,就会像89-91那样,带个沃西两次总决赛1胜8负,几乎俩光头,面对活塞公牛毫无还手之力
以后比赛建议不用打,直接按评论员的资深程度赋分
以后比赛建议不用打,直接按评论员的资深程度赋分
评论员所谓资深的本质是他看过很多球,解说过很多球,并且同时了解以前和现在你以为是单纯的评分呢
评论员所谓资深的本质是他看过很多球,解说过很多球,并且同时了解以前和现在
你以为是单纯的评分呢
说谁是goat什么时代最好难道不是你说的评论员看球解说后的评分吗?现在很多球员比赛评论员都看过了吧,可以直接给出评分了吧?对,乔丹够资深了吧,他说没有谁是goat,以后别再说谁是goat了啊
说谁是goat什么时代最好难道不是你说的评论员看球解说后的评分吗?现在很多球员比赛评论员都看过了吧,可以直接给出评分了吧?对,乔丹够资深了吧,他说没有谁是goat,以后别再说谁是goat了啊
又胡扯
乔丹为啥慢悠悠跑过去,都不伸手干扰,魔术师球还没出手就直接下快攻
我看你能犟到啥时候?
有啥胡扯的,这类大空位有多少,我每场看过的球都统计
最是知道有多少这种球,谁被放了多少这种球
这种类型的inside out内线包夹,分外线,然后这种程度的放空
雷吉米勒也不少
有啥胡扯的,这类大空位有多少,我每场看过的球都统计
最是知道有多少这种球,谁被放了多少这种球
这种类型的inside out内线包夹,分外线,然后这种程度的放空
雷吉米勒也不少
说谁是goat什么时代最好难道不是你说的评论员看球解说后的评分吗?现在很多球员比赛评论员都看过了吧,可以直接给出评分了吧?对,乔丹够资深了吧,他说没有谁是goat,以后别再说谁是goat了啊
[图片]
[图片]
说谁是goat什么时代最好难道不是你说的评论员看球解说后的评分吗?现在很多球员比赛评论员都看过了吧,可以直接给出评分了吧?对,乔丹够资深了吧,他说没有谁是goat,以后别再说谁是goat了啊
多笑话,这条恰恰证明被讨论的人自己不会谈论,而是其他人可以谈论这点
所以乔丹这个本人不说不是很正常,既是自谦,也是避嫌
但其他人评论他人就不用
多笑话,这条恰恰证明被讨论的人自己不会谈论,而是其他人可以谈论这点
所以乔丹这个本人不说不是很正常,既是自谦,也是避嫌
但其他人评论他人就不用
制定规则联盟副总裁斯图杰克逊的采访NBA.com: Since the hand-checking rule was interpreted differently beginning in the 2004-05 season, the game has opened up. Players are penetrating and the floor is spread. As a result, scoring has risen every season. Was this anticipated back in 2004? SJ: Our objective was to allow for more offensive freedom by not allowing defenders to hand-, forearm- or body-check ball handlers. By doing so, we encouraged more dribble penetration. As players penetrated more, it produced higher quality shots for the ball handler as well as shots for teammates on passes back out to perimeter. When NBA players get higher quality shots -- having more time to shoot -- they tend to make more of them. 提问:自从04~05年修改规则 ,比赛变的开放,球员们开放式的突破,结果来说,分数每年都在增加,这些在04年都被预计到了么? 回答:我们的目的在通过禁止球员用手,前臂,身体顶防运球者从而给于进攻更多的自由。通过这些,我们鼓励更多的突破。而当球员更多的突破,就能给运球者回传给外线的射手提供更高质量的投篮机会。当球员们得到更高质量的投篮以及有更多的时间准备投篮,他们会投进更多。 NBA.com: Shooting percentages have risen since 2004-05 regardless of location -- at-the-rim shots, short- and deep-mid range and 3-pointers. Does this surprise you, especially the higher percentages from 3-point range? SJ: It doesn't. With the rule and interpretation changes, it has become more difficult for defenders to defend penetration, cover the entire floor on defensive rotations and recover to shooters. This has provided more time for shooters to ready themselves for quality shots. With more dribble penetration, ball handlers are getting more opportunities at the rim. Additionally, teams now realize the 3-point shot is a great competitive equalizer, so they are taking more; they have improved their skill level on threes and are making them at a higher rate. 提问:自从修改规则后,篮下,近距离投篮和三分的命中率都提升了。这是否让你感到惊讶,特别是 三分命中率。 回答:不,随着规则的改变,防守突破要难的多,防守轮转到位也困难的多。这让射手有更多的时间调整投篮高质量的完成他们。随着更多的突破,控球手们获得更多攻击篮下的机会。而球队现在意识到三分是个追分利器,所以他们投的更多了。他们提高了三分。 NBA.com: The number of 3-point attempts has risen since the 2004-05 season, more so than the mid-range shots. Is this a positive development? SJ: It depends on your perspective. We feel the 3-point shot has been an exciting play for our game and has put a premium on having skill players with an all-around game. NBA.com: Doesn't the wide-open style benefit certain types of players? For example, wing players vs. frontcourt players? SJ: The benefits of an open game are not limited to just perimeter players. An open game can benefit a post player as well. Remember, if the players are spaced wider and using more of the court, then defenses have to play those players closely because they're good shooters. The style actually serves to open up the middle of the floor. If a team has an effective post player, he would have more room to operate in the post. 提问:现在的风格是否让某些特型球员受益?举个例子,侧翼和前场球员。 回答:它不只让外线球员受益。现在的比赛也让低位球员同样受易。记得么,如果球员空间拉开更大,更利用球场空间。防守就会扩的更外,因为他们是好的射手。这样就会让中路空间更大。如果一只球队有个好的低位选手,他就有更多的空间在低位单打。 NBA.com: From an Xs and Os perspective, how have coaches adjusted to a more wide-open game? What have they done differently? SJ: Coaches have utilized more space on the floor so to create more room for dribble penetration, two-man pick-and-roll basketball and dribble exchanges on the perimeter. But to do that, they have attempted to place the right personnel on the floor -- more shooters and ball handlers that require defenses to play those players on the perimeter. 提问:在现在的环境下,教练们会怎么样调整?他们现在做的有哪些不同 回答:教练已经开始利用现在规则上能拉开更多的空间的优势设计更多更好拉开空间的突破战术,2人挡拆。不过要执行这些,他们必须有正确的配置-更多的射手和控球者。
制定规则联盟副总裁斯图杰克逊的采访
NBA.com: Since the hand-checking rule was interpreted differently beginning in the 2004-05 season, the game has opened up. Players are penetrating and the floor is spread. As a result, scoring has risen every season. Was this anticipated back in 2004?
SJ: Our objective was to allow for more offensive freedom by not allowing defenders to hand-, forearm- or body-check ball handlers. By doing so, we encouraged more dribble penetration. As players penetrated more, it produced higher quality shots for the ball handler as well as shots for teammates on passes back out to perimeter. When NBA players get higher quality shots -- having more time to shoot -- they tend to make more of them.
提问:自从04~05年修改规则 ,比赛变的开放,球员们开放式的突破,结果来说,分数每年都在增加,这些在04年都被预计到了么?
回答:我们的目的在通过禁止球员用手,前臂,身体顶防运球者从而给于进攻更多的自由。通过这些,我们鼓励更多的突破。而当球员更多的突破,就能给运球者回传给外线的射手提供更高质量的投篮机会。当球员们得到更高质量的投篮以及有更多的时间准备投篮,他们会投进更多。
NBA.com: Shooting percentages have risen since 2004-05 regardless of location -- at-the-rim shots, short- and deep-mid range and 3-pointers. Does this surprise you, especially the higher percentages from 3-point range?
SJ: It doesn't. With the rule and interpretation changes, it has become more difficult for defenders to defend penetration, cover the entire floor on defensive rotations and recover to shooters. This has provided more time for shooters to ready themselves for quality shots. With more dribble penetration, ball handlers are getting more opportunities at the rim. Additionally, teams now realize the 3-point shot is a great competitive equalizer, so they are taking more; they have improved their skill level on threes and are making them at a higher rate.
提问:自从修改规则后,篮下,近距离投篮和三分的命中率都提升了。这是否让你感到惊讶,特别是 三分命中率。
回答:不,随着规则的改变,防守突破要难的多,防守轮转到位也困难的多。这让射手有更多的时间调整投篮高质量的完成他们。随着更多的突破,控球手们获得更多攻击篮下的机会。而球队现在意识到三分是个追分利器,所以他们投的更多了。他们提高了三分。
NBA.com: The number of 3-point attempts has risen since the 2004-05 season, more so than the mid-range shots. Is this a positive development?
SJ: It depends on your perspective. We feel the 3-point shot has been an exciting play for our game and has put a premium on having skill players with an all-around game.
NBA.com: Doesn't the wide-open style benefit certain types of players? For example, wing players vs. frontcourt players?
SJ: The benefits of an open game are not limited to just perimeter players. An open game can benefit a post player as well. Remember, if the players are spaced wider and using more of the court, then defenses have to play those players closely because they're good shooters. The style actually serves to open up the middle of the floor. If a team has an effective post player, he would have more room to operate in the post.
提问:现在的风格是否让某些特型球员受益?举个例子,侧翼和前场球员。
回答:它不只让外线球员受益。现在的比赛也让低位球员同样受易。记得么,如果球员空间拉开更大,更利用球场空间。防守就会扩的更外,因为他们是好的射手。这样就会让中路空间更大。如果一只球队有个好的低位选手,他就有更多的空间在低位单打。
NBA.com: From an Xs and Os perspective, how have coaches adjusted to a more wide-open game? What have they done differently?
SJ: Coaches have utilized more space on the floor so to create more room for dribble penetration, two-man pick-and-roll basketball and dribble exchanges on the perimeter. But to do that, they have attempted to place the right personnel on the floor -- more shooters and ball handlers that require defenses to play those players on the perimeter.
提问:在现在的环境下,教练们会怎么样调整?他们现在做的有哪些不同
回答:教练已经开始利用现在规则上能拉开更多的空间的优势设计更多更好拉开空间的突破战术,2人挡拆。不过要执行这些,他们必须有正确的配置-更多的射手和控球者。
答非所问,规则影响的是技术学习和使用的倾向而不是有没有这个技术?像我距离的shammgod和杀手crossover在30年他们前合不合法?但是要学去哪学?
答非所问,规则影响的是技术学习和使用的倾向而不是有没有这个技术?像我距离的shammgod和杀手crossover在30年他们前合不合法?但是要学去哪学?
有啥胡扯的,这类大空位有多少,我每场看过的球都统计最是知道有多少这种球,谁被放了多少这种球这种类型的inside out内线包夹,分外线,然后这种程度的放空雷吉米勒也不少
有啥胡扯的,这类大空位有多少,我每场看过的球都统计
最是知道有多少这种球,谁被放了多少这种球
这种类型的inside out内线包夹,分外线,然后这种程度的放空
雷吉米勒也不少
话都看不懂吗?
是说空位吗?看的是是乔丹的防守策略和态度,一路散步过去,手都不伸直接快攻,解释解释吧?
别告诉我乔丹防守消极
话都看不懂吗?
是说空位吗?看的是是乔丹的防守策略和态度,一路散步过去,手都不伸直接快攻,解释解释吧?
别告诉我乔丹防守消极
那更简单,一句话的事,乔丹比魔术师强多了,可以以他建队打出2个王朝魔术师有个没投篮的致命伤,所以只适合做极品二当家,让他当第一核心,就会像89-91那样,带个沃西两次总决赛1胜8负,几乎俩光头,面对活塞公牛毫无还手之力
那更简单,一句话的事,乔丹比魔术师强多了,可以以他建队打出2个王朝
魔术师有个没投篮的致命伤,所以只适合做极品二当家,让他当第一核心,就会像89-91那样,带个沃西两次总决赛1胜8负,几乎俩光头,面对活塞公牛毫无还手之力
乔丹本来就比魔术师强啊,这还用说
乔丹本来就比魔术师强啊,这还用说
说实话,这一手背身含金量很高的,身为詹蜜你应该懂才对
詹子背身欺负小个有一手的
詹子背身欺负小个有一手的
同样规则下如果都注重身体,同样要练身体的情况,现在的运动科学和营养技术不比20年前好?远古吹最大的问题就是对社会发展缺乏基本常识。
同样规则下如果都注重身体,同样要练身体的情况,现在的运动科学和营养技术不比20年前好?远古吹最大的问题就是对社会发展缺乏基本常识。
上海匡慧网络科技有限公司 沪B2-20211235 沪ICP备2021021198号-6 Copyright ©2021 KUANGHUI All Rights Reserved. 匡慧公司 版权所有