全部回帖
某人是中锋但要和后卫比命中率
某人是中锋但要和后卫比命中率
按你的逻辑，我这几个图是不是说明乔丹三分强的可怕。
一个说的是时代，一个说的是个人，拿集锦看球是这样的
一个说的是时代，一个说的是个人，拿集锦看球是这样的
没闹明白你说的和我说的有啥关系
没闹明白你说的和我说的有啥关系
库里这三分有人防吗？还碰瓷三分，运球防守人碰一下就犯规了，在乔丹的时代可能吗？这都看不懂还出来干什么？
库里这三分有人防吗？还碰瓷三分，运球防守人碰一下就犯规了，在乔丹的时代可能吗？这都看不懂还出来干什么？
球盲才说米勒是纯投手。。
常年20+3+3，每场投5-6个三分，生涯70%的出手是16英尺以上的长两分和三分球，2分受助功率近7成，3分受助攻率近9成。我不知道在你这么懂球的眼里米勒是啥，反正在我这球盲的眼里他就是个投手。
常年20+3+3，每场投5-6个三分，生涯70%的出手是16英尺以上的长两分和三分球，2分受助功率近7成，3分受助攻率近9成。我不知道在你这么懂球的眼里米勒是啥，反正在我这球盲的眼里他就是个投手。
库里这三分有人防吗？还碰瓷三分，运球防守人碰一下就犯规了，在乔丹的时代可能吗？这都看不懂还出来干什么？
你发这些不都有人防吗？证明啥了？你特么有观点吗？
你发这些不都有人防吗？证明啥了？你特么有观点吗？
你发这些不都有人防吗？证明啥了？你特么有观点吗？
哪来的人防？不就是空位？眼睛这么不好？防守人手碰一下就是犯规，乔丹时代可能？这水平还出来扯？
哪来的人防？不就是空位？眼睛这么不好？防守人手碰一下就是犯规，乔丹时代可能？这水平还出来扯？
常年20+3+3，每场投5-6个三分，生涯70%的出手是16英尺以上的长两分和三分球，2分受助功率近7成，3分受助攻率近9成。我不知道在你这么懂球的眼里米勒是啥，反正在我这球盲的眼里他就是个投手。
[图片]
常年20+3+3，每场投5-6个三分，生涯70%的出手是16英尺以上的长两分和三分球，2分受助功率近7成，3分受助攻率近9成。我不知道在你这么懂球的眼里米勒是啥，反正在我这球盲的眼里他就是个投手。
米勒季后赛顶级的强，你以为是谁啊。。00赛季35岁季后赛场均24分命中45三分39.5，36岁季后赛场均31.3分命中45.6三分42.9，37岁场均23.6分命中50.6三分41.9。。。。这个表现历史上有几个？库里能打出来再说吧，哪怕是这个体毛时代。
米勒季后赛顶级的强，你以为是谁啊。。00赛季35岁季后赛场均24分命中45三分39.5，36岁季后赛场均31.3分命中45.6三分42.9，37岁场均23.6分命中50.6三分41.9。。。。这个表现历史上有几个？库里能打出来再说吧，哪怕是这个体毛时代。
这就吹牛逼了，前三冠总决赛乔丹三分球命中率还可以，除了第一年产量都还算不错；后三冠总决赛三分命中率没超过32%，而且还是经历了三分线缩水的俩赛季——公牛生涯期间乔丹常规赛一半的三分命中是在三分线缩水赛季拿的。有限的有统计周期内，乔丹至少后两冠60%的出手都是10英尺以上的中距离，而且有无球结合——以现在的篮球观点客观说，后期乔不考虑神那一部分，大部分时间打法更接近于背身德罗赞加汉密尔顿的结合体。
这就吹牛逼了，前三冠总决赛乔丹三分球命中率还可以，除了第一年产量都还算不错；后三冠总决赛三分命中率没超过32%，而且还是经历了三分线缩水的俩赛季——公牛生涯期间乔丹常规赛一半的三分命中是在三分线缩水赛季拿的。有限的有统计周期内，乔丹至少后两冠60%的出手都是10英尺以上的中距离，而且有无球结合——以现在的篮球观点客观说，后期乔不考虑神那一部分，大部分时间打法更接近于背身德罗赞加汉密尔顿的结合体。
加强版德罗赞
加强版德罗赞
一个说的是时代，一个说的是个人，拿集锦看球是这样的
一个说的是时代，一个说的是个人，拿集锦看球是这样的
nba官方都承认的事，你基本常识都不懂，怎么出来谈时代的？
制定规则联盟副总裁斯图杰克逊的采访
NBA.com: Since the hand-checking rule was interpreted differently beginning in the 2004-05 season, the game has opened up. Players are penetrating and the floor is spread. As a result, scoring has risen every season. Was this anticipated back in 2004?
SJ: Our objective was to allow for more offensive freedom by not allowing defenders to hand-, forearm- or body-check ball handlers. By doing so, we encouraged more dribble penetration. As players penetrated more, it produced higher quality shots for the ball handler as well as shots for teammates on passes back out to perimeter. When NBA players get higher quality shots -- having more time to shoot -- they tend to make more of them.
提问：自从04~05年修改规则 ，比赛变的开放，球员们开放式的突破，结果来说，分数每年都在增加，这些在04年都被预计到了么？
回答：我们的目的在通过禁止球员用手，前臂，身体顶防运球者从而给于进攻更多的自由。通过这些，我们鼓励更多的突破。而当球员更多的突破，就能给运球者回传给外线的射手提供更高质量的投篮机会。当球员们得到更高质量的投篮以及有更多的时间准备投篮，他们会投进更多。
NBA.com: Shooting percentages have risen since 2004-05 regardless of location -- at-the-rim shots, short- and deep-mid range and 3-pointers. Does this surprise you, especially the higher percentages from 3-point range?
SJ: It doesn't. With the rule and interpretation changes, it has become more difficult for defenders to defend penetration, cover the entire floor on defensive rotations and recover to shooters. This has provided more time for shooters to ready themselves for quality shots. With more dribble penetration, ball handlers are getting more opportunities at the rim. Additionally, teams now realize the 3-point shot is a great competitive equalizer, so they are taking more; they have improved their skill level on threes and are making them at a higher rate.
提问：自从修改规则后，篮下，近距离投篮和三分的命中率都提升了。这是否让你感到惊讶，特别是 三分命中率。
回答：不，随着规则的改变，防守突破要难的多，防守轮转到位也困难的多。这让射手有更多的时间调整投篮高质量的完成他们。随着更多的突破，控球手们获得更多攻击篮下的机会。而球队现在意识到三分是个追分利器，所以他们投的更多了。他们提高了三分。
NBA.com: The number of 3-point attempts has risen since the 2004-05 season, more so than the mid-range shots. Is this a positive development?
SJ: It depends on your perspective. We feel the 3-point shot has been an exciting play for our game and has put a premium on having skill players with an all-around game.
NBA.com: Doesn't the wide-open style benefit certain types of players? For example, wing players vs. frontcourt players?
SJ: The benefits of an open game are not limited to just perimeter players. An open game can benefit a post player as well. Remember, if the players are spaced wider and using more of the court, then defenses have to play those players closely because they're good shooters. The style actually serves to open up the middle of the floor. If a team has an effective post player, he would have more room to operate in the post.
提问：现在的风格是否让某些特型球员受益？举个例子，侧翼和前场球员。
回答：它不只让外线球员受益。现在的比赛也让低位球员同样受易。记得么，如果球员空间拉开更大，更利用球场空间。防守就会扩的更外，因为他们是好的射手。这样就会让中路空间更大。如果一只球队有个好的低位选手，他就有更多的空间在低位单打。
NBA.com: From an Xs and Os perspective, how have coaches adjusted to a more wide-open game? What have they done differently?
SJ: Coaches have utilized more space on the floor so to create more room for dribble penetration, two-man pick-and-roll basketball and dribble exchanges on the perimeter. But to do that, they have attempted to place the right personnel on the floor -- more shooters and ball handlers that require defenses to play those players on the perimeter.
提问：在现在的环境下，教练们会怎么样调整？他们现在做的有哪些不同
回答：教练已经开始利用现在规则上能拉开更多的空间的优势设计更多更好拉开空间的突破战术，2人挡拆。不过要执行这些，他们必须有正确的配置-更多的射手和控球者。
nba官方都承认的事，你基本常识都不懂，怎么出来谈时代的？
制定规则联盟副总裁斯图杰克逊的采访
NBA.com: Since the hand-checking rule was interpreted differently beginning in the 2004-05 season, the game has opened up. Players are penetrating and the floor is spread. As a result, scoring has risen every season. Was this anticipated back in 2004?
SJ: Our objective was to allow for more offensive freedom by not allowing defenders to hand-, forearm- or body-check ball handlers. By doing so, we encouraged more dribble penetration. As players penetrated more, it produced higher quality shots for the ball handler as well as shots for teammates on passes back out to perimeter. When NBA players get higher quality shots -- having more time to shoot -- they tend to make more of them.
提问：自从04~05年修改规则 ，比赛变的开放，球员们开放式的突破，结果来说，分数每年都在增加，这些在04年都被预计到了么？
回答：我们的目的在通过禁止球员用手，前臂，身体顶防运球者从而给于进攻更多的自由。通过这些，我们鼓励更多的突破。而当球员更多的突破，就能给运球者回传给外线的射手提供更高质量的投篮机会。当球员们得到更高质量的投篮以及有更多的时间准备投篮，他们会投进更多。
NBA.com: Shooting percentages have risen since 2004-05 regardless of location -- at-the-rim shots, short- and deep-mid range and 3-pointers. Does this surprise you, especially the higher percentages from 3-point range?
SJ: It doesn't. With the rule and interpretation changes, it has become more difficult for defenders to defend penetration, cover the entire floor on defensive rotations and recover to shooters. This has provided more time for shooters to ready themselves for quality shots. With more dribble penetration, ball handlers are getting more opportunities at the rim. Additionally, teams now realize the 3-point shot is a great competitive equalizer, so they are taking more; they have improved their skill level on threes and are making them at a higher rate.
提问：自从修改规则后，篮下，近距离投篮和三分的命中率都提升了。这是否让你感到惊讶，特别是 三分命中率。
回答：不，随着规则的改变，防守突破要难的多，防守轮转到位也困难的多。这让射手有更多的时间调整投篮高质量的完成他们。随着更多的突破，控球手们获得更多攻击篮下的机会。而球队现在意识到三分是个追分利器，所以他们投的更多了。他们提高了三分。
NBA.com: The number of 3-point attempts has risen since the 2004-05 season, more so than the mid-range shots. Is this a positive development?
SJ: It depends on your perspective. We feel the 3-point shot has been an exciting play for our game and has put a premium on having skill players with an all-around game.
NBA.com: Doesn't the wide-open style benefit certain types of players? For example, wing players vs. frontcourt players?
SJ: The benefits of an open game are not limited to just perimeter players. An open game can benefit a post player as well. Remember, if the players are spaced wider and using more of the court, then defenses have to play those players closely because they're good shooters. The style actually serves to open up the middle of the floor. If a team has an effective post player, he would have more room to operate in the post.
提问：现在的风格是否让某些特型球员受益？举个例子，侧翼和前场球员。
回答：它不只让外线球员受益。现在的比赛也让低位球员同样受易。记得么，如果球员空间拉开更大，更利用球场空间。防守就会扩的更外，因为他们是好的射手。这样就会让中路空间更大。如果一只球队有个好的低位选手，他就有更多的空间在低位单打。
NBA.com: From an Xs and Os perspective, how have coaches adjusted to a more wide-open game? What have they done differently?
SJ: Coaches have utilized more space on the floor so to create more room for dribble penetration, two-man pick-and-roll basketball and dribble exchanges on the perimeter. But to do that, they have attempted to place the right personnel on the floor -- more shooters and ball handlers that require defenses to play those players on the perimeter.
提问：在现在的环境下，教练们会怎么样调整？他们现在做的有哪些不同
回答：教练已经开始利用现在规则上能拉开更多的空间的优势设计更多更好拉开空间的突破战术，2人挡拆。不过要执行这些，他们必须有正确的配置-更多的射手和控球者。
常年20+3+3，每场投5-6个三分，生涯70%的出手是16英尺以上的长两分和三分球，2分受助功率近7成，3分受助攻率近9成。我不知道在你这么懂球的眼里米勒是啥，反正在我这球盲的眼里他就是个投手。
[图片]
常年20+3+3，每场投5-6个三分，生涯70%的出手是16英尺以上的长两分和三分球，2分受助功率近7成，3分受助攻率近9成。我不知道在你这么懂球的眼里米勒是啥，反正在我这球盲的眼里他就是个投手。
你自己的逻辑用几张图来说事，我用你的逻辑打你的脸有什么问题？我这也有图，所以米勒是纯投手吗？
你自己的逻辑用几张图来说事，我用你的逻辑打你的脸有什么问题？我这也有图，所以米勒是纯投手吗？
你发这些不都有人防吗？证明啥了？你特么有观点吗？
哪来的人防？不就是空位？眼睛这么不好？防守人手碰一下就是犯规，上篮都没人补，空荡荡随便上，乔丹时代可能？这水平还出来扯？
哪来的人防？不就是空位？眼睛这么不好？防守人手碰一下就是犯规，上篮都没人补，空荡荡随便上，乔丹时代可能？这水平还出来扯？
你自己的逻辑用几张图来说事，我用你的逻辑打你的脸有什么问题？我这也有图，所以米勒是纯投手吗？
[图片]
[图片]
[图片]
[图片]
[图片]
[图片]
你自己的逻辑用几张图来说事，我用你的逻辑打你的脸有什么问题？我这也有图，所以米勒是纯投手吗？
我列数据你用这么几张图打我脸？我懂了，按你说的只要米勒有过禁区得分、持球单打，他就不单纯是射手。我没图但有数据，米勒生涯基础、高阶以及各项攻防一体化指标没有数据是零，所以他不单是射手，也是持球攻框手、快攻手，是挡拆接持球的双面手，是背身进攻者；同样他肯定也是突破分球手、球队组织者、弧顶发牌手；当然防守端还是领防人兼协防人兼护框人。毕竟我一个球盲又没图，肯定不如你懂，估计雷吉米勒的角色都没列齐。
科沃尔生涯还有扣篮数，所以像我这样单纯把他定位为三分投手的肯定都是球盲，毕竟你这么懂球还有图的可以发20张。我懂了也学会了，下次再有别人敢说谁是个投手，我立马找一堆这人扣篮、突破的动图狠狠打这些球盲的脸。
我列数据你用这么几张图打我脸？我懂了，按你说的只要米勒有过禁区得分、持球单打，他就不单纯是射手。我没图但有数据，米勒生涯基础、高阶以及各项攻防一体化指标没有数据是零，所以他不单是射手，也是持球攻框手、快攻手，是挡拆接持球的双面手，是背身进攻者；同样他肯定也是突破分球手、球队组织者、弧顶发牌手；当然防守端还是领防人兼协防人兼护框人。毕竟我一个球盲又没图，肯定不如你懂，估计雷吉米勒的角色都没列齐。
科沃尔生涯还有扣篮数，所以像我这样单纯把他定位为三分投手的肯定都是球盲，毕竟你这么懂球还有图的可以发20张。我懂了也学会了，下次再有别人敢说谁是个投手，我立马找一堆这人扣篮、突破的动图狠狠打这些球盲的脸。
哪来的人防？不就是空位？眼睛这么不好？防守人手碰一下就是犯规，上篮都没人补，空荡荡随便上，乔丹时代可能？这水平还出来扯？
你发的几个吊图除了图6是个体毛哨，其他要不二次进攻、要不无球跑位还有特么小打大，在三分线过防守漏勺我大乐福。还有俩库里造三分犯规，我也觉得不该给，你要没事就去找库里球迷对线去，我又不是。上篮没人补那个才算阵地战，乔丹时代进攻有现代篮球这么多这么五外站位？三角进攻变五角进攻？要不是看你语言这么有攻击性，我都觉得你是友军。
你发的几个吊图除了图6是个体毛哨，其他要不二次进攻、要不无球跑位还有特么小打大，在三分线过防守漏勺我大乐福。还有俩库里造三分犯规，我也觉得不该给，你要没事就去找库里球迷对线去，我又不是。上篮没人补那个才算阵地战，乔丹时代进攻有现代篮球这么多这么五外站位？三角进攻变五角进攻？要不是看你语言这么有攻击性，我都觉得你是友军。
nba官方都承认的事，你基本常识都不懂，怎么出来谈时代的？制定规则联盟副总裁斯图杰克逊的采访NBA.com: Since the hand-checking rule was interpreted differently beginning in the 2004-05 season, the game has opened up. Players are penetrating and the floor is spread. As a result, scoring has risen every season. Was this anticipated back in 2004? SJ: Our objective was to allow for more offensive freedom by not allowing defenders to hand-, forearm- or body-check ball handlers. By doing so, we encouraged more dribble penetration. As players penetrated more, it produced higher quality shots for the ball handler as well as shots for teammates on passes back out to perimeter. When NBA players get higher quality shots -- having more time to shoot -- they tend to make more of them. 提问：自从04~05年修改规则 ，比赛变的开放，球员们开放式的突破，结果来说，分数每年都在增加，这些在04年都被预计到了么？ 回答：我们的目的在通过禁止球员用手，前臂，身体顶防运球者从而给于进攻更多的自由。通过这些，我们鼓励更多的突破。而当球员更多的突破，就能给运球者回传给外线的射手提供更高质量的投篮机会。当球员们得到更高质量的投篮以及有更多的时间准备投篮，他们会投进更多。 NBA.com: Shooting percentages have risen since 2004-05 regardless of location -- at-the-rim shots, short- and deep-mid range and 3-pointers. Does this surprise you, especially the higher percentages from 3-point range? SJ: It doesn't. With the rule and interpretation changes, it has become more difficult for defenders to defend penetration, cover the entire floor on defensive rotations and recover to shooters. This has provided more time for shooters to ready themselves for quality shots. With more dribble penetration, ball handlers are getting more opportunities at the rim. Additionally, teams now realize the 3-point shot is a great competitive equalizer, so they are taking more; they have improved their skill level on threes and are making them at a higher rate. 提问：自从修改规则后，篮下，近距离投篮和三分的命中率都提升了。这是否让你感到惊讶，特别是 三分命中率。 回答：不，随着规则的改变，防守突破要难的多，防守轮转到位也困难的多。这让射手有更多的时间调整投篮高质量的完成他们。随着更多的突破，控球手们获得更多攻击篮下的机会。而球队现在意识到三分是个追分利器，所以他们投的更多了。他们提高了三分。 NBA.com: The number of 3-point attempts has risen since the 2004-05 season, more so than the mid-range shots. Is this a positive development? SJ: It depends on your perspective. We feel the 3-point shot has been an exciting play for our game and has put a premium on having skill players with an all-around game. NBA.com: Doesn't the wide-open style benefit certain types of players? For example, wing players vs. frontcourt players? SJ: The benefits of an open game are not limited to just perimeter players. An open game can benefit a post player as well. Remember, if the players are spaced wider and using more of the court, then defenses have to play those players closely because they're good shooters. The style actually serves to open up the middle of the floor. If a team has an effective post player, he would have more room to operate in the post. 提问：现在的风格是否让某些特型球员受益？举个例子，侧翼和前场球员。 回答：它不只让外线球员受益。现在的比赛也让低位球员同样受易。记得么，如果球员空间拉开更大，更利用球场空间。防守就会扩的更外，因为他们是好的射手。这样就会让中路空间更大。如果一只球队有个好的低位选手，他就有更多的空间在低位单打。 NBA.com: From an Xs and Os perspective, how have coaches adjusted to a more wide-open game? What have they done differently? SJ: Coaches have utilized more space on the floor so to create more room for dribble penetration, two-man pick-and-roll basketball and dribble exchanges on the perimeter. But to do that, they have attempted to place the right personnel on the floor -- more shooters and ball handlers that require defenses to play those players on the perimeter. 提问：在现在的环境下，教练们会怎么样调整？他们现在做的有哪些不同 回答：教练已经开始利用现在规则上能拉开更多的空间的优势设计更多更好拉开空间的突破战术，2人挡拆。不过要执行这些，他们必须有正确的配置-更多的射手和控球者。
[图片]
[图片]
[图片]
[图片]
nba官方都承认的事，你基本常识都不懂，怎么出来谈时代的？
制定规则联盟副总裁斯图杰克逊的采访
NBA.com: Since the hand-checking rule was interpreted differently beginning in the 2004-05 season, the game has opened up. Players are penetrating and the floor is spread. As a result, scoring has risen every season. Was this anticipated back in 2004?
SJ: Our objective was to allow for more offensive freedom by not allowing defenders to hand-, forearm- or body-check ball handlers. By doing so, we encouraged more dribble penetration. As players penetrated more, it produced higher quality shots for the ball handler as well as shots for teammates on passes back out to perimeter. When NBA players get higher quality shots -- having more time to shoot -- they tend to make more of them.
提问：自从04~05年修改规则 ，比赛变的开放，球员们开放式的突破，结果来说，分数每年都在增加，这些在04年都被预计到了么？
回答：我们的目的在通过禁止球员用手，前臂，身体顶防运球者从而给于进攻更多的自由。通过这些，我们鼓励更多的突破。而当球员更多的突破，就能给运球者回传给外线的射手提供更高质量的投篮机会。当球员们得到更高质量的投篮以及有更多的时间准备投篮，他们会投进更多。
NBA.com: Shooting percentages have risen since 2004-05 regardless of location -- at-the-rim shots, short- and deep-mid range and 3-pointers. Does this surprise you, especially the higher percentages from 3-point range?
SJ: It doesn't. With the rule and interpretation changes, it has become more difficult for defenders to defend penetration, cover the entire floor on defensive rotations and recover to shooters. This has provided more time for shooters to ready themselves for quality shots. With more dribble penetration, ball handlers are getting more opportunities at the rim. Additionally, teams now realize the 3-point shot is a great competitive equalizer, so they are taking more; they have improved their skill level on threes and are making them at a higher rate.
提问：自从修改规则后，篮下，近距离投篮和三分的命中率都提升了。这是否让你感到惊讶，特别是 三分命中率。
回答：不，随着规则的改变，防守突破要难的多，防守轮转到位也困难的多。这让射手有更多的时间调整投篮高质量的完成他们。随着更多的突破，控球手们获得更多攻击篮下的机会。而球队现在意识到三分是个追分利器，所以他们投的更多了。他们提高了三分。
NBA.com: The number of 3-point attempts has risen since the 2004-05 season, more so than the mid-range shots. Is this a positive development?
SJ: It depends on your perspective. We feel the 3-point shot has been an exciting play for our game and has put a premium on having skill players with an all-around game.
NBA.com: Doesn't the wide-open style benefit certain types of players? For example, wing players vs. frontcourt players?
SJ: The benefits of an open game are not limited to just perimeter players. An open game can benefit a post player as well. Remember, if the players are spaced wider and using more of the court, then defenses have to play those players closely because they're good shooters. The style actually serves to open up the middle of the floor. If a team has an effective post player, he would have more room to operate in the post.
提问：现在的风格是否让某些特型球员受益？举个例子，侧翼和前场球员。
回答：它不只让外线球员受益。现在的比赛也让低位球员同样受易。记得么，如果球员空间拉开更大，更利用球场空间。防守就会扩的更外，因为他们是好的射手。这样就会让中路空间更大。如果一只球队有个好的低位选手，他就有更多的空间在低位单打。
NBA.com: From an Xs and Os perspective, how have coaches adjusted to a more wide-open game? What have they done differently?
SJ: Coaches have utilized more space on the floor so to create more room for dribble penetration, two-man pick-and-roll basketball and dribble exchanges on the perimeter. But to do that, they have attempted to place the right personnel on the floor -- more shooters and ball handlers that require defenses to play those players on the perimeter.
提问：在现在的环境下，教练们会怎么样调整？他们现在做的有哪些不同
回答：教练已经开始利用现在规则上能拉开更多的空间的优势设计更多更好拉开空间的突破战术，2人挡拆。不过要执行这些，他们必须有正确的配置-更多的射手和控球者。
你懂常识就不会这么断章取义了，要么蠢要么坏。首先截取采访是指04-05规则修改。因为97-04NBA全面倾向防守和内线进攻，是不是鲨鱼邓肯他们的锅我不if，反正这七八年里全联盟平均进攻节奏跌破90，三分占比跌破两成，是一部分人所谓现代篮球观赏性最差的阶段，战术发展停滞，以平民活塞夺冠达到顶峰，这是二十一世纪以来NBA第一次鼓励进攻的改变，和你所谓九十年代的强硬防守没太大关系，公牛乔丹也只赶上了一两年；
其次截图校花和前面的文字采访没半毛钱关系，14年上台后他只是推崇更加自由的进攻，上台没几个月出台了所谓的希伯特法则彻底解放了以库里、哈登为首的小个子技术型进攻球员，NBA直接进入小球时代。
而你所崇尚的90年代身体激烈对抗，还真不是90年代那批老一代球星打出来的，从80年代到所谓坏小子军团活跃的90年代初期，直到乔丹棒球回归的头几年，都是NBA在基于6、70年代那种所谓传统篮球后创新发展的十来年，当代篮球到很多技战术都是在那个时期开始萌芽发展，各个球队才建立起现代篮球文化和理念。
不过说这些都白扯，像你这种只会厚古薄今、拾人牙慧，没啥自己的观点和理解，复制粘贴一把好手，寄希望于在网上找存在感的，沟通对线价值真是无限趋近零。
你懂常识就不会这么断章取义了，要么蠢要么坏。首先截取采访是指04-05规则修改。因为97-04NBA全面倾向防守和内线进攻，是不是鲨鱼邓肯他们的锅我不if，反正这七八年里全联盟平均进攻节奏跌破90，三分占比跌破两成，是一部分人所谓现代篮球观赏性最差的阶段，战术发展停滞，以平民活塞夺冠达到顶峰，这是二十一世纪以来NBA第一次鼓励进攻的改变，和你所谓九十年代的强硬防守没太大关系，公牛乔丹也只赶上了一两年；
其次截图校花和前面的文字采访没半毛钱关系，14年上台后他只是推崇更加自由的进攻，上台没几个月出台了所谓的希伯特法则彻底解放了以库里、哈登为首的小个子技术型进攻球员，NBA直接进入小球时代。
而你所崇尚的90年代身体激烈对抗，还真不是90年代那批老一代球星打出来的，从80年代到所谓坏小子军团活跃的90年代初期，直到乔丹棒球回归的头几年，都是NBA在基于6、70年代那种所谓传统篮球后创新发展的十来年，当代篮球到很多技战术都是在那个时期开始萌芽发展，各个球队才建立起现代篮球文化和理念。
不过说这些都白扯，像你这种只会厚古薄今、拾人牙慧，没啥自己的观点和理解，复制粘贴一把好手，寄希望于在网上找存在感的，沟通对线价值真是无限趋近零。
