全部回帖
因为这么多年我根本就没有看到过官方版的乔丹法则,所有关于乔丹法则的内容都来自不同人的描述,我用的就是这些转述和分析所以,请拿出你说的3条是官方版乔丹法则的实锤
因为这么多年我根本就没有看到过官方版的乔丹法则,所有关于乔丹法则的内容都来自不同人的描述,我用的就是这些转述和分析
所以,请拿出你说的3条是官方版乔丹法则的实锤
乔丹法则本来就依照当时联盟设反孤立单打法衍生的,我所谓三条只是最基本的三条,还有很多。乔丹法则又不是单单就这些。真是笑了,不看别人说的,还疯狂来抬杠。
乔丹法则本来就依照当时联盟设反孤立单打法衍生的,我所谓三条只是最基本的三条,还有很多。乔丹法则又不是单单就这些。真是笑了,不看别人说的,还疯狂来抬杠。
原来官方的也是假的啊,哈哈哈哈哈哈哈。球员说的都对。哈哈哈哈哈哈哈。笑死了,笑死了
原来你是官方啊
原来你是官方啊
不是
空中斩首把人打的地上滚是冲球不冲人,那科比空中斩首林书豪也不能算脏动作了,关键是乔丹被人打脑袋的时候又是什么反应?就这吼裁判裁判都不敢给个T。他打人脑袋是冲球不冲人,人打他脑袋?“裁判!你干点事啊!”
空中斩首把人打的地上滚是冲球不冲人,那科比空中斩首林书豪也不能算脏动作了,关键是乔丹被人打脑袋的时候又是什么反应?就这吼裁判裁判都不敢给个T。他打人脑袋是冲球不冲人,人打他脑袋?“裁判!你干点事啊!”
原来官方的也是假的啊,哈哈哈哈哈哈哈。球员说的都对。哈哈哈哈哈哈哈。笑死了,笑死了
这玩意本来不就是活塞创造出来对付乔丹的?到你这当事人说的不算了,你说了算,牛逼,你别回我了,我都嫌丢人
这玩意本来不就是活塞创造出来对付乔丹的?到你这当事人说的不算了,你说了算,牛逼,你别回我了,我都嫌丢人
真是搞笑了,乔丹拿球就包夹?乔丹不突破,活塞拿头包夹啊?哈哈哈哈哈哈哈。到底谁不能理解?还特么的拿球就包夹。这视频是在讲乔丹法则吗?乔丹法则是接球就包夹吗?哈哈哈哈哈哈哈
真是搞笑了,乔丹拿球就包夹?乔丹不突破,活塞拿头包夹啊?哈哈哈哈哈哈哈。到底谁不能理解?还特么的拿球就包夹。这视频是在讲乔丹法则吗?乔丹法则是接球就包夹吗?哈哈哈哈哈哈哈
再给你截几个,真的是我发的视频一丁点不看就会脑补。
包夹是乔丹法则的重要一环,我反驳的就是你所谓的前三节让乔丹单打第四节上强度,这里的包夹是从第一节就开始的,足以证明你在瞎扯
最后,把你发的三条是“官方”乔丹法则的实锤拿出来,不要转移话题
再给你截几个,真的是我发的视频一丁点不看就会脑补。
包夹是乔丹法则的重要一环,我反驳的就是你所谓的前三节让乔丹单打第四节上强度,这里的包夹是从第一节就开始的,足以证明你在瞎扯
最后,把你发的三条是“官方”乔丹法则的实锤拿出来,不要转移话题
空中斩首把人打的地上滚是冲球不冲人,那科比空中斩首林书豪也不能算脏动作了,关键是乔丹被人打脑袋的时候又是什么反应?就这吼裁判裁判都不敢给个T。他打人脑袋是冲球不冲人,人打他脑袋?“裁判!你干点事啊!”
[图片]
空中斩首把人打的地上滚是冲球不冲人,那科比空中斩首林书豪也不能算脏动作了,关键是乔丹被人打脑袋的时候又是什么反应?就这吼裁判裁判都不敢给个T。他打人脑袋是冲球不冲人,人打他脑袋?“裁判!你干点事啊!”
1.乔丹打到人头你知道对面的反应吗?
2.乔丹打到人头没被吹犯规吗?
3.超音速对乔丹有大量如图所示的犯规不被吹,是个人被这么对待都会有情绪
1.乔丹打到人头你知道对面的反应吗?
2.乔丹打到人头没被吹犯规吗?
3.超音速对乔丹有大量如图所示的犯规不被吹,是个人被这么对待都会有情绪
? 这个和我说的矛盾吗? 谁会去采访普通角色球员?
? 这个和我说的矛盾吗? 谁会去采访普通角色球员?
林书豪是10天合同的最后一天,马上就没合同的球员。
林书豪是10天合同的最后一天,马上就没合同的球员。
只是规则改一改球员投射就变高了?和训练水平以及科学没关系?就98总决赛马龙的两个后卫搭档总决赛6场就进了2个三分球,是规则不让他们三分线投篮?大空位不出手还一头往篮下扎,要么就传球,作为小个子白人得分后卫,还没远投,放今天上不上的了场都不一定
[图片]
[图片]
只是规则改一改球员投射就变高了?和训练水平以及科学没关系?就98总决赛马龙的两个后卫搭档总决赛6场就进了2个三分球,是规则不让他们三分线投篮?大空位不出手还一头往篮下扎,要么就传球,作为小个子白人得分后卫,还没远投,放今天上不上的了场都不一定
看来你是学上的不够,真的不懂啊,给你多点信息,自己去理解吧
你想知道为何比赛风格会改变, NBA官方告诉你,他们制定规则,他们清楚改规则后的风格变化
当时制定规则联盟副总裁斯图杰克逊的采访
NBA.com: Since the hand-checking rule was interpreted differently beginning in the 2004-05 season, the game has opened up. Players are penetrating and the floor is spread. As a result, scoring has risen every season. Was this anticipated back in 2004?
SJ: No. The scoring increase was not our goal. Our objective was to allow for more offensive freedom by not allowing defenders to hand-, forearm- or body-check ball handlers. By doing so, we encouraged more dribble penetration. As players penetrated more, it produced higher quality shots for the ball handler as well as shots for teammates on passes back out to perimeter. When NBA players get higher quality shots -- having more time to shoot -- they tend to make more of them.
提问:自从04~05年修改规则 ,比赛变的开放,球员们开放式的突破,结果来说,分数每年都在增加,这些在04年都被预计到了么?
回答:不,增加得分并不是我们的目的。我们的目的在通过禁止球员用手,前臂,身体顶防运球者从而给于进攻更多的自由。通过这些,我们鼓励更多的突破。而当球员更多的突破,就能给运球者回传给外线的射手提供更高质量的投篮机会。当球员们得到更高质量的投篮以及有更多的时间准备投篮,他们会投进更多。
NBA.com: Shooting percentages have risen since 2004-05 regardless of location -- at-the-rim shots, short- and deep-mid range and 3-pointers. Does this surprise you, especially the higher percentages from 3-point range?
SJ: It doesn't. With the rule and interpretation changes, it has become more difficult for defenders to defend penetration, cover the entire floor on defensive rotations and recover to shooters. This has provided more time for shooters to ready themselves for quality shots. With more dribble penetration, ball handlers are getting more opportunities at the rim. Additionally, teams now realize the 3-point shot is a great competitive equalizer, so they are taking more; they have improved their skill level on threes and are making them at a higher rate.
提问:自从修改规则后,篮下,近距离投篮和三分的命中率都提升了。这是否让你感到惊讶,特别是 三分命中率。
回答:不,随着规则的改变,防守突破要难的多,防守轮转到位也困难的多。这让射手有更多的时间调整投篮高质量的完成他们。随着更多的突破,控球手们获得更多攻击篮下的机会。而球队现在意识到三分是个追分利器,所以他们投的更多了。他们提高了三分。
NBA.com: The number of 3-point attempts has risen since the 2004-05 season, more so than the mid-range shots. Is this a positive development?
SJ: It depends on your perspective. We feel the 3-point shot has been an exciting play for our game and has put a premium on having skill players with an all-around game.
NBA.com: Doesn't the wide-open style benefit certain types of players? For example, wing players vs. frontcourt players?
SJ: The benefits of an open game are not limited to just perimeter players. An open game can benefit a post player as well. Remember, if the players are spaced wider and using more of the court, then defenses have to play those players closely because they're good shooters. The style actually serves to open up the middle of the floor. If a team has an effective post player, he would have more room to operate in the post.
提问:现在的风格是否让某些特型球员受益?举个例子,侧翼和前场球员。
回答:它不只让外线球员受益。现在的比赛也让低位球员同样受易。记得么,如果球员空间拉开更大,更利用球场空间。防守就会扩的更外,因为他们是好的射手。这样就会让中路空间更大。如果一只球队有个好的低位选手,他就有更多的空间在低位单打。
NBA.com: From an Xs and Os perspective, how have coaches adjusted to a more wide-open game? What have they done differently?
SJ: Coaches have utilized more space on the floor so to create more room for dribble penetration, two-man pick-and-roll basketball and dribble exchanges on the perimeter. But to do that, they have attempted to place the right personnel on the floor -- more shooters and ball handlers that require defenses to play those players on the perimeter.
提问:在现在的环境下,教练们会怎么样调整?他们现在做的有哪些不同
回答:教练已经开始利用现在规则上能拉开更多的空间的优势设计更多更好拉开空间的突破战术,2人当差。不过要执行这些,他们必须有正确的配置-更多的射手和控球者。
NBA官方说的很清楚,削弱外线对抗,让突破更自由导致轮转更难,需要更多补,而更多补又会造成更多外线空档,难以轮转,给外线投篮巨大空档,为了利用好这种突破+巨大空档的优势,所以在配置上更多用三分射手,同时在战术上更多的用挡拆。
这么一来二去,三分射手又反过来回馈单打手和突破手,让他们有更多的1对1和空间。
这才是前因后果和逻辑原因,给外线打法开绿灯,是一切的源头和开始。
而为何给外线开绿灯,就是乔丹在90年代的成功,让nba想持续让这种外线成功持续留在nba,持续吸引球迷,持续维持巨大的市场和经济利益。
看来你是学上的不够,真的不懂啊,给你多点信息,自己去理解吧
你想知道为何比赛风格会改变, NBA官方告诉你,他们制定规则,他们清楚改规则后的风格变化
当时制定规则联盟副总裁斯图杰克逊的采访
NBA.com: Since the hand-checking rule was interpreted differently beginning in the 2004-05 season, the game has opened up. Players are penetrating and the floor is spread. As a result, scoring has risen every season. Was this anticipated back in 2004?
SJ: No. The scoring increase was not our goal. Our objective was to allow for more offensive freedom by not allowing defenders to hand-, forearm- or body-check ball handlers. By doing so, we encouraged more dribble penetration. As players penetrated more, it produced higher quality shots for the ball handler as well as shots for teammates on passes back out to perimeter. When NBA players get higher quality shots -- having more time to shoot -- they tend to make more of them.
提问:自从04~05年修改规则 ,比赛变的开放,球员们开放式的突破,结果来说,分数每年都在增加,这些在04年都被预计到了么?
回答:不,增加得分并不是我们的目的。我们的目的在通过禁止球员用手,前臂,身体顶防运球者从而给于进攻更多的自由。通过这些,我们鼓励更多的突破。而当球员更多的突破,就能给运球者回传给外线的射手提供更高质量的投篮机会。当球员们得到更高质量的投篮以及有更多的时间准备投篮,他们会投进更多。
NBA.com: Shooting percentages have risen since 2004-05 regardless of location -- at-the-rim shots, short- and deep-mid range and 3-pointers. Does this surprise you, especially the higher percentages from 3-point range?
SJ: It doesn't. With the rule and interpretation changes, it has become more difficult for defenders to defend penetration, cover the entire floor on defensive rotations and recover to shooters. This has provided more time for shooters to ready themselves for quality shots. With more dribble penetration, ball handlers are getting more opportunities at the rim. Additionally, teams now realize the 3-point shot is a great competitive equalizer, so they are taking more; they have improved their skill level on threes and are making them at a higher rate.
提问:自从修改规则后,篮下,近距离投篮和三分的命中率都提升了。这是否让你感到惊讶,特别是 三分命中率。
回答:不,随着规则的改变,防守突破要难的多,防守轮转到位也困难的多。这让射手有更多的时间调整投篮高质量的完成他们。随着更多的突破,控球手们获得更多攻击篮下的机会。而球队现在意识到三分是个追分利器,所以他们投的更多了。他们提高了三分。
NBA.com: The number of 3-point attempts has risen since the 2004-05 season, more so than the mid-range shots. Is this a positive development?
SJ: It depends on your perspective. We feel the 3-point shot has been an exciting play for our game and has put a premium on having skill players with an all-around game.
NBA.com: Doesn't the wide-open style benefit certain types of players? For example, wing players vs. frontcourt players?
SJ: The benefits of an open game are not limited to just perimeter players. An open game can benefit a post player as well. Remember, if the players are spaced wider and using more of the court, then defenses have to play those players closely because they're good shooters. The style actually serves to open up the middle of the floor. If a team has an effective post player, he would have more room to operate in the post.
提问:现在的风格是否让某些特型球员受益?举个例子,侧翼和前场球员。
回答:它不只让外线球员受益。现在的比赛也让低位球员同样受易。记得么,如果球员空间拉开更大,更利用球场空间。防守就会扩的更外,因为他们是好的射手。这样就会让中路空间更大。如果一只球队有个好的低位选手,他就有更多的空间在低位单打。
NBA.com: From an Xs and Os perspective, how have coaches adjusted to a more wide-open game? What have they done differently?
SJ: Coaches have utilized more space on the floor so to create more room for dribble penetration, two-man pick-and-roll basketball and dribble exchanges on the perimeter. But to do that, they have attempted to place the right personnel on the floor -- more shooters and ball handlers that require defenses to play those players on the perimeter.
提问:在现在的环境下,教练们会怎么样调整?他们现在做的有哪些不同
回答:教练已经开始利用现在规则上能拉开更多的空间的优势设计更多更好拉开空间的突破战术,2人当差。不过要执行这些,他们必须有正确的配置-更多的射手和控球者。
NBA官方说的很清楚,削弱外线对抗,让突破更自由导致轮转更难,需要更多补,而更多补又会造成更多外线空档,难以轮转,给外线投篮巨大空档,为了利用好这种突破+巨大空档的优势,所以在配置上更多用三分射手,同时在战术上更多的用挡拆。
这么一来二去,三分射手又反过来回馈单打手和突破手,让他们有更多的1对1和空间。
这才是前因后果和逻辑原因,给外线打法开绿灯,是一切的源头和开始。
而为何给外线开绿灯,就是乔丹在90年代的成功,让nba想持续让这种外线成功持续留在nba,持续吸引球迷,持续维持巨大的市场和经济利益。
? 这个和我说的矛盾吗? 谁会去采访普通角色球员?
? 这个和我说的矛盾吗? 谁会去采访普通角色球员?
林书豪是10天合同的最后一天,马上就没合同的球员。还真不是角色球员,都快成素人了
林书豪是10天合同的最后一天,马上就没合同的球员。还真不是角色球员,都快成素人了
到底是在混淆视听啊?到底谁把乔丹法则归类为只有恶犯啊?哈哈哈哈哈哈哈。
上海匡慧网络科技有限公司 沪B2-20211235 沪ICP备2021021198号-6 Copyright ©2021 KUANGHUI All Rights Reserved. 匡慧公司 版权所有