你看得懂英文吗？你标出来的这些词， woven, adulterated，intentional等，没有一个词指向这个律师是造假的，这份6页的判决书最终的判决也不是C罗无罪，看不懂英文就不要再去看什么判决书了，里面的专业词你不会以为翻译软件能解释清楚吧？
看看GOAL这类国外网站是怎么提取判决书关键信息的吧：An excerpt of Tuesday's six-page ruling reads as follows: “The district court clearly recognized the gravity of dismissing the case and accordingly provided a thorough analysis, amply supported by factual finding. [The 2010 settlement] lay dormant until 2017, when ... `Football Leaks' released hundreds of documents through a cyber hack of Ronaldo's former attorneys. Despite the settlement and confidentiality agreement between Ronaldo and Mayorga, Stovall sought and used documents from 'Football Leaks' — including those clearly marked attorney-client privileged — to prosecute a new lawsuit on behalf of Mayorga against Ronaldo.
"Judge Dorsey properly held that Ronaldo did not waive or otherwise forfeit his claim of attorney-client privilege as to the 'Football Leaks' documents. Before the leak, his attorneys employed cybersecurity tools to protect their files. As the district court noted, Ronaldo mistakenly produced the course of ‘navigating this unorthodox predicament,' kicked off by Mayorga's counsel's 'unprincipled conduct' long before, and instituted vigorous efforts to protect the documents afterwards. The district court did not abuse its discretion when it found that a case-terminating sanction was appropriate."不懂的话给你解释一下：1 女方律师利用从football leaks获取的隐私信息（特别标注attorney-client privileged）重新起诉C罗，尽管之前已经有settlement 和confidentiality agreement（C罗交钱了，并且签了保密协议），所以法官经过全面的分析，考虑到这件案子已经尘封了7年（2010-2017）, 并且在此期间C罗律师一直用相关软件对这些遭到泄密的文件进行保护，所以没有任何迹象表明C罗有放弃这些信息的保密权。所以法官认定，女方律师获取的信息途径不当，驳回了这个起诉。2 败诉之后，女方律师又上诉到更高的法院（federal district court），这次女方律师认为法官Dorsey不应该驳回之前的起诉，并且认为Dorsey 不应该拒绝女方要公布保密协议（也就是前面提到的confidentiality agreement）的申请。但是这次district court认为这个律师非法取证行为恶劣，所以处以重大罚款。判决书哪里指出律师是造假？麻烦你提个词出来行吗？如果觉得weave就是造假，我建议你好好学学英文，参照下英英字典，再不济去问问同学朋友懂英文的。不然真的蛮丢人的。这份判决书，更没有提到C罗是无罪的，再提一嘴，C罗如果认为泄密文件是错误，造假的，他可以让律师把这份文件交给警官，放弃对这些信息的保密权，但他没有。整个案子会败诉的原因最重要的还是非法取证。
你看得懂英文吗？你标出来的这些词， woven, adulterated，intentional等，没有一个词指向这个律师是造假的，这份6页的判决书最终的判决也不是C罗无罪，看不懂英文就不要再去看什么判决书了，里面的专业词你不会以为翻译软件能解释清楚吧？
看看GOAL这类国外网站是怎么提取判决书关键信息的吧：An excerpt of Tuesday's six-page ruling reads as follows: “The district court clearly recognized the gravity of dismissing the case and accordingly provided a thorough analysis, amply supported by factual finding. [The 2010 settlement] lay dormant until 2017, when ... `Football Leaks' released hundreds of documents through a cyber hack of Ronaldo's former attorneys. Despite the settlement and confidentiality agreement between Ronaldo and Mayorga, Stovall sought and used documents from 'Football Leaks' — including those clearly marked attorney-client privileged — to prosecute a new lawsuit on behalf of Mayorga against Ronaldo.
"Judge Dorsey properly held that Ronaldo did not waive or otherwise forfeit his claim of attorney-client privilege as to the 'Football Leaks' documents. Before the leak, his attorneys employed cybersecurity tools to protect their files. As the district court noted, Ronaldo mistakenly produced the course of ‘navigating this unorthodox predicament,' kicked off by Mayorga's counsel's 'unprincipled conduct' long before, and instituted vigorous efforts to protect the documents afterwards. The district court did not abuse its discretion when it found that a case-terminating sanction was appropriate."不懂的话给你解释一下：1 女方律师利用从football leaks获取的隐私信息（特别标注attorney-client privileged）重新起诉C罗，尽管之前已经有settlement 和confidentiality agreement（C罗交钱了，并且签了保密协议），所以法官经过全面的分析，考虑到这件案子已经尘封了7年（2010-2017）, 并且在此期间C罗律师一直用相关软件对这些遭到泄密的文件进行保护，所以没有任何迹象表明C罗有放弃这些信息的保密权。所以法官认定，女方律师获取的信息途径不当，驳回了这个起诉。2 败诉之后，女方律师又上诉到更高的法院（federal district court），这次女方律师认为法官Dorsey不应该驳回之前的起诉，并且认为Dorsey 不应该拒绝女方要公布保密协议（也就是前面提到的confidentiality agreement）的申请。但是这次district court认为这个律师非法取证行为恶劣，所以处以重大罚款。判决书哪里指出律师是造假？麻烦你提个词出来行吗？如果觉得weave就是造假，我建议你好好学学英文，参照下英英字典，再不济去问问同学朋友懂英文的。不然真的蛮丢人的。这份判决书，更没有提到C罗是无罪的，再提一嘴，C罗如果认为泄密文件是错误，造假的，他可以让律师把这份文件交给警官，放弃对这些信息的保密权，但他没有。整个案子会败诉的原因最重要的还是非法取证。
