全部回帖
那些踢完之后信誓旦旦的出来科普越位规则，还拿之前的误判说事的懂哥都哪里去了
那些踢完之后信誓旦旦的出来科普越位规则，还拿之前的误判说事的懂哥都哪里去了
英足总还是会玩的，明着弄你，过一个月了再说，哎呀妈呀失误了，你爱咋咋地吧，反正分数是加不回来地。VAR视频需要研究一个月才能出结果？不是VAR瞎，是英足总跪着服侍，只能用腚眼看世界，另“眼”看世界的结果就体现在世界大赛上的成绩上了
英足总还是会玩的，明着弄你，过一个月了再说，哎呀妈呀失误了，你爱咋咋地吧，反正分数是加不回来地。VAR视频需要研究一个月才能出结果？不是VAR瞎，是英足总跪着服侍，只能用腚眼看世界，另“眼”看世界的结果就体现在世界大赛上的成绩上了
一群不看原文或者看不懂英文的看个标题就又兴奋了。。。韦伯哪句话说这是错判了？？？
“Over time, the laws of the game have moved in a direction where to be penalised for being in a offside position without touching the ball, you have to one of four quite specific things. The aim was to be consistent with the application.”
“Rashford doesn't exactly do those four things, but you can make an argument that he does. There's definitely an element of interpretation needed, there's some subjectivity about it. On the day, the officials didn't feel he had interfered in the way it is defined in the law. That was supportable.”
“The game has told us that there's an expectation that the situation should have led to an offside. We're here to serve the game and listen to the game.”
“If that same circumstance happened again, you'd probably see a different outcome now based on all we've taken on board since then.”
“You can't say it was an incorrect decision because the law is quite subjective, there's some flexibility in the way you can interpret the law. It's clear that most people would expect that to be offside if exactly the same thing happens again.”
一群不看原文或者看不懂英文的看个标题就又兴奋了。。。韦伯哪句话说这是错判了？？？
“Over time, the laws of the game have moved in a direction where to be penalised for being in a offside position without touching the ball, you have to one of four quite specific things. The aim was to be consistent with the application.”
“Rashford doesn't exactly do those four things, but you can make an argument that he does. There's definitely an element of interpretation needed, there's some subjectivity about it. On the day, the officials didn't feel he had interfered in the way it is defined in the law. That was supportable.”
“The game has told us that there's an expectation that the situation should have led to an offside. We're here to serve the game and listen to the game.”
“If that same circumstance happened again, you'd probably see a different outcome now based on all we've taken on board since then.”
“You can't say it was an incorrect decision because the law is quite subjective, there's some flexibility in the way you can interpret the law. It's clear that most people would expect that to be offside if exactly the same thing happens again.”
意思不就是，反正我说的算？我说算越位就是越位，我说不算就是不算。最终解释权在裁判手里。这比不就是明着来搞心态吗？反正你爱说啥说啥，再有同等情况，我愿意怎么判就怎么判。
意思不就是，反正我说的算？我说算越位就是越位，我说不算就是不算。最终解释权在裁判手里。这比不就是明着来搞心态吗？反正你爱说啥说啥，再有同等情况，我愿意怎么判就怎么判。
还是挺明显的
这个球不判越位就是足球界天大的笑话。跟篮球下快攻判越位差不多了。
这个球不判越位就是足球界天大的笑话。跟篮球下快攻判越位差不多了。
英足总这个生命的意思就是，虽然是误判，但只能曼联获利，以后其他球队可别想着获利
英足总这个生命的意思就是，虽然是误判，但只能曼联获利，以后其他球队可别想着获利
意思不就是，反正我说的算？我说算越位就是越位，我说不算就是不算。最终解释权在裁判手里。这比不就是明着来搞心态吗？反正你爱说啥说啥，再有同等情况，我愿意怎么判就怎么判。
[图片]
意思不就是，反正我说的算？我说算越位就是越位，我说不算就是不算。最终解释权在裁判手里。这比不就是明着来搞心态吗？反正你爱说啥说啥，再有同等情况，我愿意怎么判就怎么判。
对呀，但是回归这帖子标题，扯什么“官方说进球错判拉什福德越位在先”就是引流标题党，甚至天空体育小编原文也是。
对呀，但是回归这帖子标题，扯什么“官方说进球错判拉什福德越位在先”就是引流标题党，甚至天空体育小编原文也是。
敢在曼联专区发么
不在专区也能喷你举报你
不在专区也能喷你举报你
为什么曼联总因为这种可笑的判罚受益
为什么曼联总因为这种可笑的判罚受益
