一群不看原文或者看不懂英文的看个标题就又兴奋了。。。韦伯哪句话说这是错判了？？？
“Over time, the laws of the game have moved in a direction where to be penalised for being in a offside position without touching the ball, you have to one of four quite specific things. The aim was to be consistent with the application.”
“Rashford doesn't exactly do those four things, but you can make an argument that he does. There's definitely an element of interpretation needed, there's some subjectivity about it. On the day, the officials didn't feel he had interfered in the way it is defined in the law. That was supportable.”
“The game has told us that there's an expectation that the situation should have led to an offside. We're here to serve the game and listen to the game.”
“If that same circumstance happened again, you'd probably see a different outcome now based on all we've taken on board since then.”
“You can't say it was an incorrect decision because the law is quite subjective, there's some flexibility in the way you can interpret the law. It's clear that most people would expect that to be offside if exactly the same thing happens again.”
一群不看原文或者看不懂英文的看个标题就又兴奋了。。。韦伯哪句话说这是错判了？？？
“Over time, the laws of the game have moved in a direction where to be penalised for being in a offside position without touching the ball, you have to one of four quite specific things. The aim was to be consistent with the application.”
“Rashford doesn't exactly do those four things, but you can make an argument that he does. There's definitely an element of interpretation needed, there's some subjectivity about it. On the day, the officials didn't feel he had interfered in the way it is defined in the law. That was supportable.”
“The game has told us that there's an expectation that the situation should have led to an offside. We're here to serve the game and listen to the game.”
“If that same circumstance happened again, you'd probably see a different outcome now based on all we've taken on board since then.”
“You can't say it was an incorrect decision because the law is quite subjective, there's some flexibility in the way you can interpret the law. It's clear that most people would expect that to be offside if exactly the same thing happens again.”
