(3天内)Who Deserves All-NBA, All-Defensive, and All-Rookie Team Honors:part 1由asjkfj 发表在翻译团招工部 https://bbs.hupu.com/fyt-store
Shortly after the NBA suspended its season in March, I named the players I’d pick for the league’s year-end individual trophies. “I don’t have a ballot for the NBA’s year-end awards,” I wrote. “If I did, though—and if we had to vote based on the roughly 80 percent of the season that we actually got to see—here’s how I’d have filled it out.”
Well, a couple of funny things happened during the past four months. (“Funny,” of course, being relative these days.) For one, the NBA did instruct its voting body to cast ballots based solely on performance prior to the March 11 shutdown, without considering the “seeding games” that tip off this week. For another: The league office actually did give me a ballot for the first time in my career, which is kind of awesome, and kind of terrifying.
You can read my picks for Most Valuable Player, Rookie of the Year, Defensive Player of the Year, Most Improved Player, Sixth Man of the Year, and Coach of the Year, and the rationales behind them all, here. In addition to the individual awards, though, getting a real ballot means dishing out team hardware, too—All-NBA, All-Defensive, and All-Rookie. So, without further ado ...
All-NBA
First Team
C: Anthony Davis, Lakers
F: Giannis Antetokounmpo, Bucks
F: Kawhi Leonard, Clippers
G: LeBron James, Lakers
G: James Harden, Rockets
Right off the bat, I’m confronted by an issue. When making your selections, the league presents this mandate: “Please vote for the player at the position he plays regularly.” But in the post-positional revolution NBA, how exactly are you supposed to determine that?
Take the King, for example. According to Basketball-Reference, LeBron spent 57 percent of his floor time this season playing point guard; as a result, the site lists that as his position. By Cleaning the Glass’s reckoning, though, James (classified there more amorphously as a wing) played 85 percent of his possessions as a small forward, flanked by a nominal point like Avery Bradley, Rajon Rondo, or Alex Caruso. And if, as the old coaching adage goes, you are what you guard, well, according to defensive versatility metrics compiled by Krishna Narsu and Andrew Patton of The BBall Index, LeBron defended small forwards more frequently than any other position; the analysis pegs James’s average defensive matchup at 2.9—just this side of the traditional backcourt/frontcourt divide.
After spending some time driving myself nuts about the relative ethics of taking someone I might believe in my heart of hearts is a forward and labeling them a guard on my ballot, or vice versa, I eventually decided to try something new for me: chilling the hell out for, like, a second.
As many basketball pundits (including the one who runs this website) have said before, the All-NBA teams are fundamentally intended to identify the best five, 10, and 15 players in any given season. And if the NBA’s going to allow us to embrace the fluidity of the modern game by making multiple players eligible at multiple spots, and I can use that freedom to try to make my ballot look as close as possible to who I actually thought were the best players in the league this season ... well, I might as well take advantage. So I’m putting LeBron in the backcourt, despite all that small-forward-related evidence, and putting Anthony Davis at center, despite Davis spending most of this season alongside either JaVale McGee or Dwight Howard. That allows me to get my full five-man MVP ballot onto the first team.
Second Team
C: Nikola Jokic, Nuggets
F: Jimmy Butler, Heat
F: Luka Doncic, Mavericks
G: Damian Lillard, Trail Blazers
G: Chris Paul, Thunder
My second team started with my final two cuts from the MVP ballot: Doncic and Jokic. Doncic took a gigantic leap in his second season as the preternaturally gifted pick-and-roll pilot of the NBA’s most devastating offense. Jokic powered through a sluggish start to deliver a lights-out final 50 games—21.3 points on scorching .624 true shooting to go with 10.3 rebounds, 7.1 assists, and 1.2 steals in 32.7 minutes per game—to pace a 43-22 Denver team that will resume play just 1.5 games behind the Clippers for the no. 2 seed out West.
I quickly tabbed Lillard for one second team guard spot. While the Blazers stumbled to a 29-37 mark due to a raft of frontcourt injuries, Dame remained a metronomic monster of production, posting career highs in scoring (28.9 points per game, fifth in the league) and assists (7.8 per game, sixth) while shooting 39.4 percent from 3-point range on just under 10 tries a night. He almost single-handedly carried Portland to the NBA’s no. 8 offense and within hailing distance of a playoff berth; the Blazers scored 10.2 fewer points per 100 possessions when he was on the bench, among the largest offensive on-court/off-court swings of any big-minutes player.
One of the few players with an even larger swing? Paul, who got the ball back in his hands after a two-season timeshare in Houston, and who responded with a brilliant bounceback campaign in which he consistently served as the league’s most dominant crunch-time performer—no mean feat for a 6-foot-1 35-year-old.
Even those who thought the post–Russell Westbrook and Paul George Thunder had a chance to be a playoff contender likely didn’t see them fighting for a top seed in the brutal West. There’s plenty of credit to go around—to rising star Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, to ace reserve Dennis Schröder, to coach Billy Donovan—but the lion’s share rests with Paul. His counting stats don’t necessarily scream off the page (17.7 points, 6.8 assists, 4.9 rebounds, and 1.6 steals in 31.8 minutes per game) but his advanced impact numbers do: sixth in player-impact plus-minus and ESPN’s real plus-minus, tied for ninth in win shares and 10th in value over replacement player, and 12th in box plus-minus. Oklahoma City outscored opponents by 6.7 points-per-100 with CP3 on the floor and got outscored by 6.7 points-per-100 with him off of it—essentially the difference between the competency levels of the Celtics and the Knicks. Which is, y’know, one hell of a difference, and worthy of a second-team slot.
Butler, too, fares well in the advanced metrics discussion—top 10 in win shares, BPM, and VORP; 12th in player efficiency rating; 16th in both PIPM and NBA.com’s player impact estimate—and has been a made-to-order fit for a Miami team that needed a snarling star to unlock a talented young roster. Despite his jumper all but abandoning him—he shot just 34.3 percent outside the restricted area this season—Jimmy has remained an effective source of offense, thanks to his ability to bull rush his way to the foul line (an absurd .679 free throw rate, fourth highest in the league and tops by a mile among non-big men) and a career-best 6.1 assists per game. He impacted the Heat from the moment he arrived, helping Erik Spoelstra turn Miami into a legit force for the first time since LeBron left town. (And since he and Doncic are both eligible at forward, I again erred on the side of “get the 10 best dudes in the league this season in the first two teams,” and slotted four just-on-the-outskirts-of-the-MVP-ballot-level playmakers alongside Jokic.)
Third Team
C: Rudy Gobert, Jazz
F: Pascal Siakam, Raptors
F: Khris Middleton, Bucks
G: Ben Simmons, 76ers
G: Jayson Tatum, Celtics
Third-team center came down to Gobert, Joel Embiid, and Bam Adebayo. In a vacuum, and when fully healthy, I’d take Embiid over the other two—and, honestly, over just about anybody else in the league. But injuries once again limited the big fella’s availability; Adebayo played in 21 more games than Embiid and logged 906 more minutes, while Gobert played 18 more games and 813 more minutes than the Sixer. When Embiid did play, Philly’s season-long struggles to space the floor—and Embiid’s own midseason struggle to figure out how to be “a good asshole” on the court—seemed to sap his effectiveness. That Embiid could seem only sort of halfway there for two-thirds of the season and still put up 23 and 12 every night is indicative of just how talented he is; in a characteristically dysfunctional and sort of disappointing Sixers season, though, he falls just out of the top three at his position.
Adebayo was a revelation in Miami this season—an athletic marvel who can guard in space and muscle up in the post, run the break in transition and sky for lobs in the pick-and-roll, and serve as a half-court offensive hub slinging passes from the high post. (Among big men, only Jokic assisted on a higher share of his teammates’ buckets than 23-year-old Bam.) His leap to a well-deserved first All-Star selection has nearly as much to do with Miami’s rise as Butler’s arrival; how he fares on both ends in his first taste of major postseason minutes could go a long way toward determining how the Heat fare at Disney. In the end, though, I opted for Gobert, who—even in something of a down year, by his two-time Defensive Player of the Year standards—remains arguably the league’s most fearsome interior deterrent, and its leader in defensive real plus-minus for the fourth consecutive season.
Long built around a stifling defense and just enough offense to get by, Utah intentionally shifted its equilibrium this season, bringing in Mike Conley and Bojan Bogdanovic to ramp up the firepower, and asking Gobert to put out any additional fires on the other end. The Jazz ranked 10th in defensive efficiency when the season was suspended, their lowest mark since 2014-15—the season before Gobert became a full-time starter—but clamped down at a rate that would’ve fallen just outside the top five in the Frenchman’s minutes. Combine that with his underrated if somewhat unfashionable offense—15.1 points per game on 70 percent shooting, a top-20 offensive rebounding rate, and yes, more of those much-derided “screen assists” than anybody not named Domantas Sabonis—and Gobert gets the edge here.
Simmons might be a power forward now, but he takes one of the third-team guard spots after turning in Defensive Player of the Year–caliber work across four (and sometimes five) positions while also averaging a shade under 17-8-8 on 58.5 percent shooting. Middleton deserves a spot, shadow of Giannis be damned: He put up 21-6-4 in just 30 minutes per game, ably defends four positions in the league’s no. 1 defense, literally came within one missed shot of a 50-40-90 season—he finished 424-for-850 from the field, and 425 would’ve gotten him to an even .500 field goal percentage—and was a focal point when Antetokounmpo rested, averaging 31.4 points per 36 minutes on 60.2 percent true shooting.
Tatum rocketed into stardom in the final 20 or so games, but he was arguably the Celtics’ best player even before that. He was the through line in Boston’s best lineups, whether anchoring reserve-heavy groups without Kemba Walker or Gordon Hayward early in the season or stepping into the spotlight later as the clear no. 1 option. His ongoing improvement on the defensive end—perceived by many as his weak point coming out of Duke—has made him a linchpin of a Boston unit that ranks fourth in points allowed per possession, and he is one of the league’s most versatile perimeter stoppers. And since the NBA’s allowing us to put him at guard, that leaves the final forward spot for Siakam, who used his max extension as a springboard into life as a max player, the top scoring threat on the defending NBA champions, and the sort of offensive fulcrum that could help the Raptors not only survive the loss of Finals MVP Leonard, but thrive in his absence. Three years ago, this dude averaged 4.2 points per game and had twice as many turnovers as assists. Now, he’s putting up 23.6 points and 3.6 dimes a game as the central finisher on the no. 2 seed in the East.
Apologies to: Sabonis, who was sensational in propelling the mostly Victor Oladipo–less Pacers; Brandon Ingram, who was dynamite as a no. 1 option before the arrival of Zion Williamson and started to fit in well as a complementary scorer after the rookie’s emergence; Kyle Lowry, who’s had one hell of a victory-lap season and almost certainly would’ve slid into a guard spot if the league were more rigid about positionality in voting; Russell Westbrook, who was good for most of the year and great toward the end of it, but whose defensive failings and lagging advanced statistical profile does him in; Bradley Beal and Trae Young, whose phenomenal individual offensive output couldn’t overcome how bad they were defensively, how bad their teams were overall, and how good their competition was; and Devin Booker, who remained a flamethrower while continuing to grow his game in a more stable context.
Shortly after the NBA suspended its season in March, I named the players I’d pick for the league’s year-end individual trophies. “I don’t have a ballot for the NBA’s year-end awards,” I wrote. “If I did, though—and if we had to vote based on the roughly 80 percent of the season that we actually got to see—here’s how I’d have filled it out.”
Well, a couple of funny things happened during the past four months. (“Funny,” of course, being relative these days.) For one, the NBA did instruct its voting body to cast ballots based solely on performance prior to the March 11 shutdown, without considering the “seeding games” that tip off this week. For another: The league office actually did give me a ballot for the first time in my career, which is kind of awesome, and kind of terrifying.
You can read my picks for Most Valuable Player, Rookie of the Year, Defensive Player of the Year, Most Improved Player, Sixth Man of the Year, and Coach of the Year, and the rationales behind them all, here. In addition to the individual awards, though, getting a real ballot means dishing out team hardware, too—All-NBA, All-Defensive, and All-Rookie. So, without further ado ...
All-NBA
First Team
C: Anthony Davis, Lakers
F: Giannis Antetokounmpo, Bucks
F: Kawhi Leonard, Clippers
G: LeBron James, Lakers
G: James Harden, Rockets
Right off the bat, I’m confronted by an issue. When making your selections, the league presents this mandate: “Please vote for the player at the position he plays regularly.” But in the post-positional revolution NBA, how exactly are you supposed to determine that?
Take the King, for example. According to Basketball-Reference, LeBron spent 57 percent of his floor time this season playing point guard; as a result, the site lists that as his position. By Cleaning the Glass’s reckoning, though, James (classified there more amorphously as a wing) played 85 percent of his possessions as a small forward, flanked by a nominal point like Avery Bradley, Rajon Rondo, or Alex Caruso. And if, as the old coaching adage goes, you are what you guard, well, according to defensive versatility metrics compiled by Krishna Narsu and Andrew Patton of The BBall Index, LeBron defended small forwards more frequently than any other position; the analysis pegs James’s average defensive matchup at 2.9—just this side of the traditional backcourt/frontcourt divide.
After spending some time driving myself nuts about the relative ethics of taking someone I might believe in my heart of hearts is a forward and labeling them a guard on my ballot, or vice versa, I eventually decided to try something new for me: chilling the hell out for, like, a second.
As many basketball pundits (including the one who runs this website) have said before, the All-NBA teams are fundamentally intended to identify the best five, 10, and 15 players in any given season. And if the NBA’s going to allow us to embrace the fluidity of the modern game by making multiple players eligible at multiple spots, and I can use that freedom to try to make my ballot look as close as possible to who I actually thought were the best players in the league this season ... well, I might as well take advantage. So I’m putting LeBron in the backcourt, despite all that small-forward-related evidence, and putting Anthony Davis at center, despite Davis spending most of this season alongside either JaVale McGee or Dwight Howard. That allows me to get my full five-man MVP ballot onto the first team.
Second Team
C: Nikola Jokic, Nuggets
F: Jimmy Butler, Heat
F: Luka Doncic, Mavericks
G: Damian Lillard, Trail Blazers
G: Chris Paul, Thunder
My second team started with my final two cuts from the MVP ballot: Doncic and Jokic. Doncic took a gigantic leap in his second season as the preternaturally gifted pick-and-roll pilot of the NBA’s most devastating offense. Jokic powered through a sluggish start to deliver a lights-out final 50 games—21.3 points on scorching .624 true shooting to go with 10.3 rebounds, 7.1 assists, and 1.2 steals in 32.7 minutes per game—to pace a 43-22 Denver team that will resume play just 1.5 games behind the Clippers for the no. 2 seed out West.
I quickly tabbed Lillard for one second team guard spot. While the Blazers stumbled to a 29-37 mark due to a raft of frontcourt injuries, Dame remained a metronomic monster of production, posting career highs in scoring (28.9 points per game, fifth in the league) and assists (7.8 per game, sixth) while shooting 39.4 percent from 3-point range on just under 10 tries a night. He almost single-handedly carried Portland to the NBA’s no. 8 offense and within hailing distance of a playoff berth; the Blazers scored 10.2 fewer points per 100 possessions when he was on the bench, among the largest offensive on-court/off-court swings of any big-minutes player.
One of the few players with an even larger swing? Paul, who got the ball back in his hands after a two-season timeshare in Houston, and who responded with a brilliant bounceback campaign in which he consistently served as the league’s most dominant crunch-time performer—no mean feat for a 6-foot-1 35-year-old.
Even those who thought the post–Russell Westbrook and Paul George Thunder had a chance to be a playoff contender likely didn’t see them fighting for a top seed in the brutal West. There’s plenty of credit to go around—to rising star Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, to ace reserve Dennis Schröder, to coach Billy Donovan—but the lion’s share rests with Paul. His counting stats don’t necessarily scream off the page (17.7 points, 6.8 assists, 4.9 rebounds, and 1.6 steals in 31.8 minutes per game) but his advanced impact numbers do: sixth in player-impact plus-minus and ESPN’s real plus-minus, tied for ninth in win shares and 10th in value over replacement player, and 12th in box plus-minus. Oklahoma City outscored opponents by 6.7 points-per-100 with CP3 on the floor and got outscored by 6.7 points-per-100 with him off of it—essentially the difference between the competency levels of the Celtics and the Knicks. Which is, y’know, one hell of a difference, and worthy of a second-team slot.
Butler, too, fares well in the advanced metrics discussion—top 10 in win shares, BPM, and VORP; 12th in player efficiency rating; 16th in both PIPM and NBA.com’s player impact estimate—and has been a made-to-order fit for a Miami team that needed a snarling star to unlock a talented young roster. Despite his jumper all but abandoning him—he shot just 34.3 percent outside the restricted area this season—Jimmy has remained an effective source of offense, thanks to his ability to bull rush his way to the foul line (an absurd .679 free throw rate, fourth highest in the league and tops by a mile among non-big men) and a career-best 6.1 assists per game. He impacted the Heat from the moment he arrived, helping Erik Spoelstra turn Miami into a legit force for the first time since LeBron left town. (And since he and Doncic are both eligible at forward, I again erred on the side of “get the 10 best dudes in the league this season in the first two teams,” and slotted four just-on-the-outskirts-of-the-MVP-ballot-level playmakers alongside Jokic.)
Third Team
C: Rudy Gobert, Jazz
F: Pascal Siakam, Raptors
F: Khris Middleton, Bucks
G: Ben Simmons, 76ers
G: Jayson Tatum, Celtics
Third-team center came down to Gobert, Joel Embiid, and Bam Adebayo. In a vacuum, and when fully healthy, I’d take Embiid over the other two—and, honestly, over just about anybody else in the league. But injuries once again limited the big fella’s availability; Adebayo played in 21 more games than Embiid and logged 906 more minutes, while Gobert played 18 more games and 813 more minutes than the Sixer. When Embiid did play, Philly’s season-long struggles to space the floor—and Embiid’s own midseason struggle to figure out how to be “a good asshole” on the court—seemed to sap his effectiveness. That Embiid could seem only sort of halfway there for two-thirds of the season and still put up 23 and 12 every night is indicative of just how talented he is; in a characteristically dysfunctional and sort of disappointing Sixers season, though, he falls just out of the top three at his position.
Adebayo was a revelation in Miami this season—an athletic marvel who can guard in space and muscle up in the post, run the break in transition and sky for lobs in the pick-and-roll, and serve as a half-court offensive hub slinging passes from the high post. (Among big men, only Jokic assisted on a higher share of his teammates’ buckets than 23-year-old Bam.) His leap to a well-deserved first All-Star selection has nearly as much to do with Miami’s rise as Butler’s arrival; how he fares on both ends in his first taste of major postseason minutes could go a long way toward determining how the Heat fare at Disney. In the end, though, I opted for Gobert, who—even in something of a down year, by his two-time Defensive Player of the Year standards—remains arguably the league’s most fearsome interior deterrent, and its leader in defensive real plus-minus for the fourth consecutive season.
Long built around a stifling defense and just enough offense to get by, Utah intentionally shifted its equilibrium this season, bringing in Mike Conley and Bojan Bogdanovic to ramp up the firepower, and asking Gobert to put out any additional fires on the other end. The Jazz ranked 10th in defensive efficiency when the season was suspended, their lowest mark since 2014-15—the season before Gobert became a full-time starter—but clamped down at a rate that would’ve fallen just outside the top five in the Frenchman’s minutes. Combine that with his underrated if somewhat unfashionable offense—15.1 points per game on 70 percent shooting, a top-20 offensive rebounding rate, and yes, more of those much-derided “screen assists” than anybody not named Domantas Sabonis—and Gobert gets the edge here.
Simmons might be a power forward now, but he takes one of the third-team guard spots after turning in Defensive Player of the Year–caliber work across four (and sometimes five) positions while also averaging a shade under 17-8-8 on 58.5 percent shooting. Middleton deserves a spot, shadow of Giannis be damned: He put up 21-6-4 in just 30 minutes per game, ably defends four positions in the league’s no. 1 defense, literally came within one missed shot of a 50-40-90 season—he finished 424-for-850 from the field, and 425 would’ve gotten him to an even .500 field goal percentage—and was a focal point when Antetokounmpo rested, averaging 31.4 points per 36 minutes on 60.2 percent true shooting.
Tatum rocketed into stardom in the final 20 or so games, but he was arguably the Celtics’ best player even before that. He was the through line in Boston’s best lineups, whether anchoring reserve-heavy groups without Kemba Walker or Gordon Hayward early in the season or stepping into the spotlight later as the clear no. 1 option. His ongoing improvement on the defensive end—perceived by many as his weak point coming out of Duke—has made him a linchpin of a Boston unit that ranks fourth in points allowed per possession, and he is one of the league’s most versatile perimeter stoppers. And since the NBA’s allowing us to put him at guard, that leaves the final forward spot for Siakam, who used his max extension as a springboard into life as a max player, the top scoring threat on the defending NBA champions, and the sort of offensive fulcrum that could help the Raptors not only survive the loss of Finals MVP Leonard, but thrive in his absence. Three years ago, this dude averaged 4.2 points per game and had twice as many turnovers as assists. Now, he’s putting up 23.6 points and 3.6 dimes a game as the central finisher on the no. 2 seed in the East.
Apologies to: Sabonis, who was sensational in propelling the mostly Victor Oladipo–less Pacers; Brandon Ingram, who was dynamite as a no. 1 option before the arrival of Zion Williamson and started to fit in well as a complementary scorer after the rookie’s emergence; Kyle Lowry, who’s had one hell of a victory-lap season and almost certainly would’ve slid into a guard spot if the league were more rigid about positionality in voting; Russell Westbrook, who was good for most of the year and great toward the end of it, but whose defensive failings and lagging advanced statistical profile does him in; Bradley Beal and Trae Young, whose phenomenal individual offensive output couldn’t overcome how bad they were defensively, how bad their teams were overall, and how good their competition was; and Devin Booker, who remained a flamethrower while continuing to grow his game in a more stable context.
推荐
评论 (2)
收藏
分享
举报
只看楼主