全部回帖
我档鸽呢
我档鸽呢
詹姆斯来的第一年也没进
受伤了怎么说,而且那年没有附加赛规则有就完全进附加赛了
受伤了怎么说,而且那年没有附加赛规则有就完全进附加赛了
笑疯了
笑疯了
大雷
请问跟库里有啥关系
勇士替补真的断档,看着也没啥明星球员
勇士替补真的断档,看着也没啥明星球员
OBPM 库里联盟第二
不黑庫里,但Adjusted Plus/Minus系的高階數據現在在球探與分析員中的專業參考度並不高,而兩代bpm及其衍生數據類型除了用於跨時空縱向比對球員基本不會出現在有價值的分析報告里。
Why might APM be giving such non-intuitive results in some cases? Isit really discovering that the true value of various players is dramatically different from their commonly perceived value? In some cases, it may be doingso, but there are reasons to be concerned about APM’s accuracy. Withinthe basketball analytics community, much attention has been focused onthe issue of multicollinearity, which in this context corresponds to situationswhere pairs of players are very frequently or very rarely on the floor at thesame time. However, it is the opinion of the author that multicollinearityis only part of the story behind the struggles of the APM technique. Thereis a more general phenomenon at play, known amongst the statistics andmachine learning community as overfitting [1].Overfitting occurs when a model fits the training data too precisely, i.e.,in such a way that the fluky pecularities and noise of the data are fit, sothat the model’s predictive performance on future data is degraded. As asimple example, imagine a situation where a rookie NBA player has a FG%of 67% over the first 5 games of the season. Suppose the task is to predictthe player’s FG% over the course of the remaining 77 games. It should beintuitively obvious that the estimate which best fits the available data, 67%,is unlikely to be the optimal prediction for the entire season. The naive use2of such an estimate for the purposes of prediction would be an instance ofoverfitting. A smarter approach would be to combine the data frfrom the 5games with prior information about the typical distribution of FG% whichNBA players achieve over the course of the season.While it is true that APMmodels are often estimated over an entire season of data (or even multipleseasons) it is nonetheless the case that standard linear regression is proneto overfitting, since the data is so noisy and since so many parameters (onefor nearly every player in the league) need to be simultaneously estimated.
不黑庫里,但Adjusted Plus/Minus系的高階數據現在在球探與分析員中的專業參考度並不高,而兩代bpm及其衍生數據類型除了用於跨時空縱向比對球員基本不會出現在有價值的分析報告里。
Why might APM be giving such non-intuitive results in some cases? Isit really discovering that the true value of various players is dramatically different from their commonly perceived value? In some cases, it may be doingso, but there are reasons to be concerned about APM’s accuracy. Withinthe basketball analytics community, much attention has been focused onthe issue of multicollinearity, which in this context corresponds to situationswhere pairs of players are very frequently or very rarely on the floor at thesame time. However, it is the opinion of the author that multicollinearityis only part of the story behind the struggles of the APM technique. Thereis a more general phenomenon at play, known amongst the statistics andmachine learning community as overfitting [1].Overfitting occurs when a model fits the training data too precisely, i.e.,in such a way that the fluky pecularities and noise of the data are fit, sothat the model’s predictive performance on future data is degraded. As asimple example, imagine a situation where a rookie NBA player has a FG%of 67% over the first 5 games of the season. Suppose the task is to predictthe player’s FG% over the course of the remaining 77 games. It should beintuitively obvious that the estimate which best fits the available data, 67%,is unlikely to be the optimal prediction for the entire season. The naive use2of such an estimate for the purposes of prediction would be an instance ofoverfitting. A smarter approach would be to combine the data frfrom the 5games with prior information about the typical distribution of FG% whichNBA players achieve over the course of the season.While it is true that APMmodels are often estimated over an entire season of data (or even multipleseasons) it is nonetheless the case that standard linear regression is proneto overfitting, since the data is so noisy and since so many parameters (onefor nearly every player in the league) need to be simultaneously estimated.
没用的数据,换不来四个五个六个冠军。库里四冠,科比五冠,乔丹六冠。赢到最后的才是赢家。
没用的数据,换不来四个五个六个冠军。库里四冠,科比五冠,乔丹六冠。赢到最后的才是赢家。
为什么要除了,勇士这三年也就24没进季后赛,好歹进附加赛了,不像某队4个75大赛季都没结束就out了
威什么呢?人家詹眉两人就冠军了,你来了怎么反而拖后腿了,这是威什么呢?瓜哥最后一舞更是被毁了,四个75大谁打的最差呢?
威什么呢?人家詹眉两人就冠军了,你来了怎么反而拖后腿了,这是威什么呢?瓜哥最后一舞更是被毁了,四个75大谁打的最差呢?
我是发现了,一般首发强的替补得分就少,因为大部分出手机会全让首发占了,强如凯尔特人替补也没有30分,掘金太阳替补也排在后面,比如湖人,拉塞尔在首发的时候替补基本没有什么得分,把拉塞尔和雷迪士换位置后,替补得分就能多一点,首发就会少一点,勇士也是一样,是因为他们把格林和TJD等出手不多的球员放在了首发,把库明加和希尔德放在了替补席,其实得分总数是没差多少的
我是发现了,一般首发强的替补得分就少,因为大部分出手机会全让首发占了,强如凯尔特人替补也没有30分,掘金太阳替补也排在后面,比如湖人,拉塞尔在首发的时候替补基本没有什么得分,把拉塞尔和雷迪士换位置后,替补得分就能多一点,首发就会少一点,勇士也是一样,是因为他们把格林和TJD等出手不多的球员放在了首发,把库明加和希尔德放在了替补席,其实得分总数是没差多少的
nnd 那不是替补没有人用吗,让湖人这替补多上一会儿,主力可以不用上了
nnd 那不是替补没有人用吗,让湖人这替补多上一会儿,主力可以不用上了
原来还有一项能进前四啊 不错
Improved NBA Adjusted +/- Using Regularizationand Out-of-Sample Testing
Joseph Sill
joe@hoopnumbers.com
Improved NBA Adjusted +/- Using Regularizationand Out-of-Sample Testing
Joseph Sill
joe@hoopnumbers.com
上海匡慧网络科技有限公司 沪B2-20211235 沪ICP备2021021198号-6 Copyright ©2021 KUANGHUI All Rights Reserved. 匡慧公司 版权所有