He also was an effective pull-up shooter from distance. Tyson loves the hang dribble pull-up. He made nearly 34 percent of his 86 pull-up 3s. The good news is that the jumper looks the same across his catch-and-shoot as well as his pull-up shot. He gets to the shot from a variety of different moves: right-to-left crossover or leftto-right into a stepback. He can also make his pull-up from a variety of different footwork combinations and get his body re-aligned in mid-air even though he doesn’t take the shot with much vertical leap. He has a relatively higher release point despite his lack of length. Tyson is comfortable in the midrange too. He’s quite versatile in how you can use him. Though he largely played out of screens at Cal, Madsen’s offense was creative in how Tyson got the ball. They’d post him at times against mismatches. He played out of dribble-handoffs well. He spots up well because of the triple threat. He’s a sharp cutter, too, but most of these seemed to come out of sets.
运球超级高水平咯？

Mechanically, comes off his right shoulder and has a slight pause at the top. Sometimes he seems to shoot the ball on the way down. Also, will the fact that it’s more of a set shot off the bounce limit some of what he does, especially given that he doesn’t elevate into it all that well and doesn’t have crazy length?
这山姆的，刚刚火灵那张图也有说他投篮姿势有点问题

刚睡醒
等下补录像

小cc

这一段好像是说软件硬件防守都有点问题

定位就是你骑下一个lv吧，lv防守六进攻四，泰森进攻六防守四

这个看看就行，你翻所有人的，都很离谱

He’s strong and solid when he gets his chest in front. But he got beat off the bounce too often, and sometimes it was by bigger players as opposed to just smaller, faster guys. He struggled to get through screens on the ball. He didn’t navigate bodies well at all on this end. He seemed to get caught up in traffic way too often. It felt like his feet got stuck in the mud a bit and he’d sink in. He blocked 0.5 shots per game, but a lot of those felt like they were in recovery after he’d made an error.
应该是防挡拆，持球人的描述

进攻相似度有啥夸张的。。就看你得分模式

有限的视频看，还是硬件上有问题……突破和防守移动都慢，持球和视野可以，总感觉是无效突破结果却形成有效传球……

你骑选了有持球底子的无可厚非了，防守过得去就行了，起码身高还能看，本来进攻开发也贫瘠，另一方面也可能是为了以后lv甚至加兰高飞提前做准备

Off the ball, it was even worse. He didn’t seem to be locked in on that end. Tyson reacted late to what was happening around him too regularly. He’d get caught on a lot of screens off the ball, too. Too often, he’d wind up trailing way too far behind the play. Also, it felt like he’d just lose track of where exactly his man was far too often. He would sink too deep into the paint and get caught ball-watching. Sometimes it would involve an ill-advised double, but other times he just seemed to be asleep. I’m not sure he has great awareness of what is happening around him on that end of the court. It seems like he wants to defend on the ball, but he has a long way to go.
无球防守有溜号的意思，等小切片看看

主要是优点都看到描述和切片了，看看有哪些缺点

不就是所有人都会有小样本数据
不针对任何人
才需要直接看正负值
你说只看赢分阵容规避一些输分阵容实际上就是不科学
因为小样本数据就是会失真
你不知道今天这个阵容2分钟可能会赢分 可能明天再上几分钟会输分 需要大量的试错去确定轮换
而骑士大量伤病搞得本来常规赛季后赛的轮换都打得很散
莫里斯r1g5正负值8 g6就能-7倒送回去
你骑常规赛经过大样本考验的阵容只有米球奥克洛斯特鲁斯韦德阿伦这套阵容而已
然后就算勒韦尔方差大只能说明 他在正确的阵容是有用的 在不正确的阵容是没用的(假设这个论点是真，不论证了) 不能说明这个人的作用在前3
On-off可能不是一个好数据 但一定是衡量不可替代性最好的数据 米球常规赛季后赛这个数据就全是断档领先

无球会跟丢人，且会频繁撞掩护墙，这点无论是打后卫还是锋线都挺麻烦的，感觉作为锋线很难提供协防。

当然理想的球员最好是在场上功得进守得住，退而求其次的话，目前的版本进攻能拿分，防守漏一些也就漏了，只要不是那种每个回合对面都在找你在点名的漏洞，别人也不会专门设计来打你的。
不过话说回来锋线球员没有协防确实挺减分的。

我看有人发的介绍帖子里面，目前感觉和加兰挺像，靠一些对球路判断完成抢断维持防守端人的身份，卧槽兰！

是个人都兰化是吧

米球续约还没谈妥 我实在是不放心啊

可怜我骑这些媒体人
铺垫了两个月选足尺寸锋线现在要摁着自己头开洗