全部回帖
One interesting wrinkle is that Minnesota is a second team and not allowed to use the $4M trade exception created in February from the Troy Brown trade. Pre-existing TE are not allowed. However, teams over the apron are allowed to use a new exception created. Ex: Year 1 of the Anderson salary is $9M. The Timberwolves can now acquire a player into the $9M exception and still exceed the apron.
这规则制定的有点神奇,旧特例不准用,但可以用新特例,之前的理解还是不对
One interesting wrinkle is that Minnesota is a second team and not allowed to use the $4M trade exception created in February from the Troy Brown trade. Pre-existing TE are not allowed. However, teams over the apron are allowed to use a new exception created. Ex: Year 1 of the Anderson salary is $9M. The Timberwolves can now acquire a player into the $9M exception and still exceed the apron.
这规则制定的有点神奇,旧特例不准用,但可以用新特例,之前的理解还是不对
我之前也没想到,又学了新东西
我之前也没想到,又学了新东西
One interesting wrinkle is that Minnesota is a second team and not allowed to use the $4M trade exception created in February from the Troy Brown trade. Pre-existing TE are not allowed. However, teams over the apron are allowed to use a new exception created. Ex: Year 1 of the Anderson salary is $9M. The Timberwolves can now acquire a player into the $9M exception and still exceed the apron.
这规则制定的有点神奇,旧特例不准用,但可以用新特例,之前的理解还是不对
One interesting wrinkle is that Minnesota is a second team and not allowed to use the $4M trade exception created in February from the Troy Brown trade. Pre-existing TE are not allowed. However, teams over the apron are allowed to use a new exception created. Ex: Year 1 of the Anderson salary is $9M. The Timberwolves can now acquire a player into the $9M exception and still exceed the apron.
这规则制定的有点神奇,旧特例不准用,但可以用新特例,之前的理解还是不对
之前看Bobby Marks的科普,说not allowed to use a trade exception created from a sign-and-trade
之前看Bobby Marks的科普,说not allowed to use a trade exception created from a sign-and-trade
我看到过一个说法是芬皇要到八月份才能签合同,不见得就是他不愿意续约,然后签完合同的冷冻期会错过交易截止日
我看到过一个说法是芬皇要到八月份才能签合同,不见得就是他不愿意续约,然后签完合同的冷冻期会错过交易截止日
如果续约的话爵士就没必要卖他了,他也不应该帮爵士抬高价码,续就是长期留队了
如果续约的话爵士就没必要卖他了,他也不应该帮爵士抬高价码,续就是长期留队了
Kyle Anderson’s three-year, $27 million contract with the Warriors includes a non-guaranteed third season in the deal, league sources told
@hoopshype
.肯定高分,第三年非保障而且好处费只是互换
Kyle Anderson’s three-year, $27 million contract with the Warriors includes a non-guaranteed third season in the deal, league sources told
@hoopshype
.肯定高分,第三年非保障而且好处费只是互换
我狼给几分
我狼给几分
底薪名额留一个,900万特例后面会用得上
底薪名额留一个,900万特例后面会用得上
如果最后特例没用,这900万也会算在奢侈税计算范围吗?
如果最后特例没用,这900万也会算在奢侈税计算范围吗?
如果续约的话爵士就没必要卖他了,他也不应该帮爵士抬高价码,续就是长期留队了
如果续约的话爵士就没必要卖他了,他也不应该帮爵士抬高价码,续就是长期留队了
爵士也确实没有急切卖他的动力,除非收到一个让安吉都无法拒绝的价格
爵士也确实没有急切卖他的动力,除非收到一个让安吉都无法拒绝的价格
如果最后特例没用,这900万也会算在奢侈税计算范围吗?
如果最后特例没用,这900万也会算在奢侈税计算范围吗?
当然不会
当然不会
上海匡慧网络科技有限公司 沪B2-20211235 沪ICP备2021021198号-6 Copyright ©2021 KUANGHUI All Rights Reserved. 匡慧公司 版权所有