全部回帖
美帝亡我之心不死
美帝也只有那这个做文章了
美帝也只有那这个做文章了
世界反兴奋剂机构：23 名中国游泳运动员在东京奥运会前检测结果呈阳性
世界反兴奋剂机构（WADA）周六证实了有关 23 名中国游泳运动员在 2020 年东京奥运会前被检测出禁药阳性的报道，但该机构接受了中国的调查结果，即这是由于药物污染所致。
多家媒体报道称，在 2021 年 7 月于日本首都举行的 COVID 延期的奥运会开始前几个月，这些游泳运动员的曲美他嗪 (TMZ) 检测呈阳性，而曲美他嗪可在心脏病药物中找到。
中国反兴奋剂机构 CHINADA 和中国游泳协会没有立即回复路透社的置评请求。
世界反兴奋剂机构称，该机构于 2021 年 6 月收到中国国家反兴奋剂机构的通知，该机构决定接受游泳运动员因不慎受到污染而暴露于药物后返回的不良分析结果（AAF）。
世界反兴奋剂机构有权对各国反兴奋剂机构的裁决提出上诉。该机构表示，它对这一决定进行了审查，并咨询了科学专家和外部法律顾问，以检验中国反兴奋剂机构提出的污染理论。
"世界反兴奋剂机构在一份声明中说："世界反兴奋剂机构的最终结论是，它无法反驳 TMZ 污染来源的可能性，而且这与档案中的分析数据相符。
"世界反兴奋剂机构还得出结论认为......运动员没有过错或疏忽。因此，根据外部顾问的建议，世界反兴奋剂机构认为上诉是没有必要的。
中国 30 人游泳队在东京奥运会上共获得六枚奖牌，其中包括三枚金牌。
在没有减轻处罚情节的情况下，兴奋剂检测不合格的运动员通常会被禁赛两到四年，第二次则是终身禁赛。
世界水上运动协会是这项运动的全球机构，其前身是国际泳联，该协会表示，相信兴奋剂检测呈阳性的运动员都得到了 "认真、专业 "的处理。
该组织补充说："国际泳联兴奋剂控制审查委员会已仔细考虑了AAFs......"。"与AAFs来源有关的材料都经过了国际泳联聘请的独立专家的审查。
"世界水上运动协会深信，这些 AAFs 得到了认真、专业的处理，符合适用的反兴奋剂条例，包括《世界反兴奋剂条例》"。
世界反兴奋剂机构：23 名中国游泳运动员在东京奥运会前检测结果呈阳性
世界反兴奋剂机构（WADA）周六证实了有关 23 名中国游泳运动员在 2020 年东京奥运会前被检测出禁药阳性的报道，但该机构接受了中国的调查结果，即这是由于药物污染所致。
多家媒体报道称，在 2021 年 7 月于日本首都举行的 COVID 延期的奥运会开始前几个月，这些游泳运动员的曲美他嗪 (TMZ) 检测呈阳性，而曲美他嗪可在心脏病药物中找到。
中国反兴奋剂机构 CHINADA 和中国游泳协会没有立即回复路透社的置评请求。
世界反兴奋剂机构称，该机构于 2021 年 6 月收到中国国家反兴奋剂机构的通知，该机构决定接受游泳运动员因不慎受到污染而暴露于药物后返回的不良分析结果（AAF）。
世界反兴奋剂机构有权对各国反兴奋剂机构的裁决提出上诉。该机构表示，它对这一决定进行了审查，并咨询了科学专家和外部法律顾问，以检验中国反兴奋剂机构提出的污染理论。
"世界反兴奋剂机构在一份声明中说："世界反兴奋剂机构的最终结论是，它无法反驳 TMZ 污染来源的可能性，而且这与档案中的分析数据相符。
"世界反兴奋剂机构还得出结论认为......运动员没有过错或疏忽。因此，根据外部顾问的建议，世界反兴奋剂机构认为上诉是没有必要的。
中国 30 人游泳队在东京奥运会上共获得六枚奖牌，其中包括三枚金牌。
在没有减轻处罚情节的情况下，兴奋剂检测不合格的运动员通常会被禁赛两到四年，第二次则是终身禁赛。
世界水上运动协会是这项运动的全球机构，其前身是国际泳联，该协会表示，相信兴奋剂检测呈阳性的运动员都得到了 "认真、专业 "的处理。
该组织补充说："国际泳联兴奋剂控制审查委员会已仔细考虑了AAFs......"。"与AAFs来源有关的材料都经过了国际泳联聘请的独立专家的审查。
"世界水上运动协会深信，这些 AAFs 得到了认真、专业的处理，符合适用的反兴奋剂条例，包括《世界反兴奋剂条例》"。
WADA原文：
Following some misleading and potentially defamatory media coverage this week, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) wishes to provide more information in relation to a group of 23 Chinese swimmers who tested positive for trimetazidine (TMZ) in 2021.
WADA was notified in June 2021 of the decision by the China Anti-Doping Agency (CHINADA) to accept that the swimmers had tested positive in early 2021 for TMZ after inadvertently being exposed to the substance through contamination. As it always does, WADA carefully reviewed the decision and, in this instance, requested the full case file. As part of its review, WADA collected additional, unpublished scientific information on TMZ and consulted with independent scientific experts to test the contamination theory and also whether low doses of TMZ could have benefited the athletes during a swimming competition event. During this review process, which spanned several weeks, scientists and external legal counsel thoroughly put the contamination theory presented by CHINADA to the test. It was not possible for WADA scientists or investigators to conduct their enquiries on the ground in China given the extreme restrictions in place due to a COVID-related lockdown. WADA ultimately concluded that it was not in a position to disprove the possibility that contamination was the source of TMZ and it was compatible with the analytical data in the file. WADA also concluded that, given the specific circumstances of the asserted contamination, the athletes would be held to have no fault or negligence. As such, and based on the advice of external counsel, WADA considered that an appeal was not warranted.
WADA Senior Director, Science and Medicine, Prof. Olivier Rabin, said: “The WADA Science Department reviewed this case thoroughly in June and July 2021. Indeed, we even sought new pharmacokinetic and metabolism information on TMZ from the manufacturer and tested several hypotheses, including doping strategies with low TMZ doses, in assessing the plausibility of the contamination scenario that was presented to WADA. Ultimately, we concluded that there was no concrete basis to challenge the asserted contamination. Indeed, the contamination scenario was further supported by the combination of the consistently low concentrations of TMZ as well as no doping pattern with several athletes presenting multiple samples collected over the course of several days which fluctuated between negative and positive (and vice versa). In all transparency, we communicated the conclusions of our scientific review to internal and external investigators, including the International Testing Agency.”
In 2022, the International Testing Agency raised issues with WADA regarding a possible misreporting of the TMZ samples. This was independently reviewed by WADA Intelligence and Investigations Department, which concluded that proper procedures had been followed and that there was no evidence of wrongdoing. The United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) then contacted WADA by email in April 2023 about the TMZ cases. It advised WADA of a tip from an unspecified source that the positive TMZ cases had been hidden. This information was clearly erroneous in that the positive TMZ cases had been reported and decided by CHINADA, as well as thoroughly reviewed by both WADA and World Aquatics, nearly two years prior. USADA had also contacted WADA in 2020 (before the positive TMZ cases even arose) with respect to allegations (again from an unspecified source) of doping cover-ups within Chinese swimming. These allegations were (again) entirely unsubstantiated and WADA advised that the threshold to open an investigation was not met. However, WADA did offer to reassess the situation if USADA provided any evidence at all, which it did not. WADA I&I also offered to interview the USADA source but this offer was not taken up.
WADA Director, Intelligence and Investigations, Gunter Younger, said: “At every stage, WADA I&I followed all due process and diligently investigated every lead and line of enquiry in this matter. The information provided to us by USADA and others was reviewed on each occasion in line with our normal procedure, and assessed according to the criteria stipulated within our Confidential Source Policy. The data held by us clearly showed that there had been no attempt to hide the positive tests as they had been reported in the usual way by the Chinese authorities. Therefore, based on the available information and a lack of any credible evidence, the threshold for WADA I&I to open an investigation was not met.”
Following the misleading information that has been published this week, including on social media, WADA reserves its right to take legal action as appropriate.
WADA原文：
Following some misleading and potentially defamatory media coverage this week, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) wishes to provide more information in relation to a group of 23 Chinese swimmers who tested positive for trimetazidine (TMZ) in 2021.
WADA was notified in June 2021 of the decision by the China Anti-Doping Agency (CHINADA) to accept that the swimmers had tested positive in early 2021 for TMZ after inadvertently being exposed to the substance through contamination. As it always does, WADA carefully reviewed the decision and, in this instance, requested the full case file. As part of its review, WADA collected additional, unpublished scientific information on TMZ and consulted with independent scientific experts to test the contamination theory and also whether low doses of TMZ could have benefited the athletes during a swimming competition event. During this review process, which spanned several weeks, scientists and external legal counsel thoroughly put the contamination theory presented by CHINADA to the test. It was not possible for WADA scientists or investigators to conduct their enquiries on the ground in China given the extreme restrictions in place due to a COVID-related lockdown. WADA ultimately concluded that it was not in a position to disprove the possibility that contamination was the source of TMZ and it was compatible with the analytical data in the file. WADA also concluded that, given the specific circumstances of the asserted contamination, the athletes would be held to have no fault or negligence. As such, and based on the advice of external counsel, WADA considered that an appeal was not warranted.
WADA Senior Director, Science and Medicine, Prof. Olivier Rabin, said: “The WADA Science Department reviewed this case thoroughly in June and July 2021. Indeed, we even sought new pharmacokinetic and metabolism information on TMZ from the manufacturer and tested several hypotheses, including doping strategies with low TMZ doses, in assessing the plausibility of the contamination scenario that was presented to WADA. Ultimately, we concluded that there was no concrete basis to challenge the asserted contamination. Indeed, the contamination scenario was further supported by the combination of the consistently low concentrations of TMZ as well as no doping pattern with several athletes presenting multiple samples collected over the course of several days which fluctuated between negative and positive (and vice versa). In all transparency, we communicated the conclusions of our scientific review to internal and external investigators, including the International Testing Agency.”
In 2022, the International Testing Agency raised issues with WADA regarding a possible misreporting of the TMZ samples. This was independently reviewed by WADA Intelligence and Investigations Department, which concluded that proper procedures had been followed and that there was no evidence of wrongdoing. The United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) then contacted WADA by email in April 2023 about the TMZ cases. It advised WADA of a tip from an unspecified source that the positive TMZ cases had been hidden. This information was clearly erroneous in that the positive TMZ cases had been reported and decided by CHINADA, as well as thoroughly reviewed by both WADA and World Aquatics, nearly two years prior. USADA had also contacted WADA in 2020 (before the positive TMZ cases even arose) with respect to allegations (again from an unspecified source) of doping cover-ups within Chinese swimming. These allegations were (again) entirely unsubstantiated and WADA advised that the threshold to open an investigation was not met. However, WADA did offer to reassess the situation if USADA provided any evidence at all, which it did not. WADA I&I also offered to interview the USADA source but this offer was not taken up.
WADA Director, Intelligence and Investigations, Gunter Younger, said: “At every stage, WADA I&I followed all due process and diligently investigated every lead and line of enquiry in this matter. The information provided to us by USADA and others was reviewed on each occasion in line with our normal procedure, and assessed according to the criteria stipulated within our Confidential Source Policy. The data held by us clearly showed that there had been no attempt to hide the positive tests as they had been reported in the usual way by the Chinese authorities. Therefore, based on the available information and a lack of any credible evidence, the threshold for WADA I&I to open an investigation was not met.”
Following the misleading information that has been published this week, including on social media, WADA reserves its right to take legal action as appropriate.
上海匡慧网络科技有限公司 沪B2-20211235 沪ICP备2021021198号-6 Copyright ©2021 KUANGHUI All Rights Reserved. 匡慧公司 版权所有