Ben White/2024-04-16
阿森纳专区原创栏目【本怀特观察】第一期
作为阿森纳无可替代的中场核心,队长厄德高近期的表现足够出色,但是他的腿部伤情仍然未知。
继周日在主场不敌维拉之后,阿森纳将在本周周中做客安联球场,进行欧冠1/4决赛的第二场与拜仁慕尼黑的较量。这场比赛对于失去联赛的南大王来说将会是孤注一掷全力争胜,而近期略显疲态的阿森纳能否经得住考验?压力之下阿尔特塔将会做怎样的部署?枪迷们十四年来的期许又能否实现?
评论区留言选择你心目中本场比赛的首发阵容吧!
本期文章精选
Champions League performance insights: Arsenal and Bayern's contrasting attack patterns
欧冠表现洞察:阿森纳和拜仁对比鲜明的进攻模式
Monday, April 15, 2024
UEFA's analysis unit takes a closer look at Arsenal's pulsating quarter-final first-leg draw against Bayern.
欧足联的分析部门仔细研究了阿森纳四分之一决赛首回合战平拜仁的比赛。
Arsenal's Ben White strides forwards against Bayern (Arsenal FC via Getty Images)
阿森纳的本·怀特在对阵拜仁的比赛中大步前进
They shared four goals between them in their UEFA Champions League quarter-final first leg, yet Arsenal and Bayern München took different approaches in getting the ball into the final third and beyond.
他们在欧冠四分之一决赛首回合中共有四个进球,但阿森纳和拜仁慕尼黑在将球打入最后三分之一及其他区域时采取了不同的方法。
Here the UEFA analysis unit breaks down the forward play of the two teams, starting with their strategies to progress to the attacking third and then looking at how they advanced into the penalty box.
在这里,欧足联分析部门详细分析了两支球队的前锋进攻,首先分析他们进入进攻三区的策略,然后观察他们如何进入禁区。
Types of attack entering final third 进入最后三区的进攻类型
On an evening when Bayern had their lowest share of the ball in the competition this season (40.8%), it was no surprise that Arsenal were the team whose attacking game was built more on organised possession.
当拜仁在本赛季的比赛中控球率最低(40.8%)的那个晚上,阿森纳成为进攻比赛更多地建立在有组织的控球基础上的球队也就不足为奇了。
Mikel Arteta's men had more actions in the attacking third than Bayern and, as the above graphic shows, more than two-thirds (68%) of their entries into the final third came during periods of organised possession (versus a low block).Bayern, with less of the ball, relied more on springing forward quickly. As the chart displays, they looked for breakthroughs (19% to Arsenal's 2%) – in other words, playing through the high press or middle block to progress higher up the pitch – and also for counterattacks, which meant creating opportunities after regaining the ball in their own half (28% compared to just 2% from Arsenal).
米克尔·阿尔特塔的球队在进攻三区的行动比拜仁更多,如上图所示,他们进入进攻三区的次数超过三分之二(68%)是在有组织控球期间(相对于低位阻挡)。 球权较少的拜仁更多地依靠快速前插。如图表所示,他们寻求突破(19%,阿森纳为 2%)——换句话说,通过高位逼抢或中路拦网,向前推进——同时也寻求反击,这意味着在夺回球权后创造机会在自己的半场(28%,而阿森纳的这一比例仅为 2%)。
Champions League Performance Insight: Arsenal's organised possession
欧冠表现洞察:阿森纳有组织的控球
The video above illustrates the difference between a final-third entry following organised possession and a breakthrough, showing first Arsenal on the ball in the lead-up to Bukayo Saka's opening goal and then a quick Bayern attack.
上面的视频展示了有组织控球后的最后三区进攻和突破之间的区别,显示了在布卡约·萨卡率先进球之前阿森纳控球,然后是拜仁的快速进攻。
How the teams got to the final third 球队如何进入最后三区
The focus of this second section is how the two sides progressed to the final third in last Tuesday's fixture – and as the chart reveals, both sought to explore space behind the last line of defence with through balls.Additionally, we can see that Arsenal, with their greater share of possession, looked to play through the shape more than Bayern (with 14% of their progressions from inside penetrative passes). The north London side also had slightly more outside penetrations (26%) than their visitors (22%). As an additional point, Arsenal's efforts to penetrate on the outside were also reflected by the fact their wingers accounted for 40% of the balls received when their team advanced to the final third.
第二节的焦点是双方如何在上周二的比赛中进入最后三分之一——正如图表所示,双方都试图通过直塞球探索最后一道防线后面的空间。 此外,我们可以看到,拥有更大控球权的阿森纳比拜仁更注重通过阵型进行比赛(他们有 14% 的进攻来自内线渗透传球)。北伦敦方面的外部渗透率 (26%) 也略高于其访客 (22%)。另外,阿森纳在外线渗透的努力还体现在当球队进入最后三区时,他们的边锋占到了40%的球权。
Champions League Performance Insight: Sane individual run
欧冠表现洞察:萨内个人表现
As for Bayern, they had a greater dependence on individual actions (28%). This was a match in which both Leroy Sané and Jamal Musiala demonstrated their ability to carry the ball – and the video above shows the individual action by Sané which brought Bayern's penalty. Overall, Sané recorded an average carry distance of 9.9m which was the highest of any player who started in the quarter-final first-leg matches.
至于拜仁,他们对个人行为的依赖程度更大(28%)。这场比赛中,勒罗伊·萨内和贾马尔·穆西亚拉都展示了他们的带球能力——上面的视频显示了萨内的个人动作,为拜仁带来了点球。总体而言,萨内的平均带球距离为9.9m,是四分之一决赛首回合首发球员中最高的。
Teams entering the penalty box 球队如何进入禁区
The next aspect to consider is how the teams got into the opposition penalty area – and the 'individual actions' category emphasises how the sides differed in their approach here. In Bayern's case, individual actions – of the kind seen in the previous video – accounted for more than two-thirds (67%) of their penalty-box entries.Arsenal have individuals with the ability to penetrate defences yet they progressed via a wider variety of means – individual actions (20%), through balls (23%), crosses (27%) and even throw-ins (17%).
下一个要考虑的方面是球队如何进入对方禁区——“个人行动”类别强调双方在此处的做法有何不同。在拜仁的案例中,个人行为——就像之前视频中看到的那样——占了他们禁区内三分之二以上(67%)的比例。 阿森纳拥有突破防守能力的个人,但他们通过更广泛的方式取得进步——个人行动(20%)、直塞球(23%)、传中(27%)甚至界外球(17%)。
Champions League Performance Insight: Rice through-ball
欧冠表现洞察:赖斯直传球
This third video offers an example of a through ball from the English side with the angled pass by Declan Rice beyond the Bayern backline for Saka to run onto. For the record, Rice ended the match with the joint-highest number of line-breaking passes into the attacking third alongside substitute Oleksandr Zinchenko (five each).As observed in this previous article by UEFA match observer Rafael Benítez, Arsenal's high pressing and energy were other significant features of their performance against the German champions. This is seen in the additional fact that two-fifths (41%) of Arsenal's shots came after they had won the ball in the opposition half (33% from pressing regains, 8% from transitions).
第三个视频提供了英格兰队直塞球的例子,德克兰·赖斯(Declan Rice)将斜传球越过拜仁队的后线,让萨卡(Saka)跑过去。赖斯打破了比赛记录,与替补出场的亚历山大·津琴科(各 5 次)一起,以并列最多的突破线传球进入进攻三区的方式结束了比赛。 正如欧足联比赛观察员拉斐尔·贝尼特斯在上一篇文章中所观察到的那样,阿森纳的高逼抢和活力是他们对阵德国冠军球队的另一个显着特征。从另一个事实中可以看出,阿森纳五分之二(41%)的射门是在对方半场赢得球权后进行的(33%来自抢夺球权,8%来自攻防转换)。
Arsenal’s right-flank focus 阿森纳的右翼焦点
In his analysis, Benítez also highlighted Arsenal's productive efforts along their right flank, particularly in the opening period. "With [Martin] Ødegaard on the right, between the lines, and with [full-back Ben] White higher even than Saka sometimes, they were a threat," he said. The 3D animation above emphasises this point, showing that more than half (57%) of the home team's penalty-box entry attempts came on the right side (lane 4).The final video below gives an example of this right-sided threat, showing White high up the pitch as he collects a pass from Kai Havertz and gets in an attempt on goal in the opening period.
在他的分析中,贝尼特斯还强调了阿森纳在右翼的富有成效的努力,特别是在开局阶段。 “马丁厄德高在右路,在两条线之间,边后卫本怀特有时甚至比萨卡更高,他们是一个威胁,”他说。上面的 3D 动画强调了这一点,显示超过一半 (57%) 的主队进入禁区尝试来自右侧(第 4 道)。 下面的最后一个视频给出了这种右路威胁的例子,展示了怀特在开场阶段接到凯·哈弗茨的传球并尝试射门时在球场上的高位。
Champions League Performance Insight: Arsenal's right-flank focus
欧冠表现洞察:阿森纳的右翼焦点
本文摘自欧冠官网UEFA.com
COYG!制作不易,欢迎支持本怀特!
Ben White/2024-04-16
阿森纳专区原创栏目【本怀特观察】第一期
作为阿森纳无可替代的中场核心,队长厄德高近期的表现足够出色,但是他的腿部伤情仍然未知。
继周日在主场不敌维拉之后,阿森纳将在本周周中做客安联球场,进行欧冠1/4决赛的第二场与拜仁慕尼黑的较量。这场比赛对于失去联赛的南大王来说将会是孤注一掷全力争胜,而近期略显疲态的阿森纳能否经得住考验?压力之下阿尔特塔将会做怎样的部署?枪迷们十四年来的期许又能否实现?
评论区留言选择你心目中本场比赛的首发阵容吧!
本期文章精选
Champions League performance insights: Arsenal and Bayern's contrasting attack patterns
欧冠表现洞察:阿森纳和拜仁对比鲜明的进攻模式
Monday, April 15, 2024
UEFA's analysis unit takes a closer look at Arsenal's pulsating quarter-final first-leg draw against Bayern.
欧足联的分析部门仔细研究了阿森纳四分之一决赛首回合战平拜仁的比赛。
Arsenal's Ben White strides forwards against Bayern (Arsenal FC via Getty Images)
阿森纳的本·怀特在对阵拜仁的比赛中大步前进
They shared four goals between them in their UEFA Champions League quarter-final first leg, yet Arsenal and Bayern München took different approaches in getting the ball into the final third and beyond.
他们在欧冠四分之一决赛首回合中共有四个进球,但阿森纳和拜仁慕尼黑在将球打入最后三分之一及其他区域时采取了不同的方法。
Here the UEFA analysis unit breaks down the forward play of the two teams, starting with their strategies to progress to the attacking third and then looking at how they advanced into the penalty box.
在这里,欧足联分析部门详细分析了两支球队的前锋进攻,首先分析他们进入进攻三区的策略,然后观察他们如何进入禁区。
Types of attack entering final third 进入最后三区的进攻类型
On an evening when Bayern had their lowest share of the ball in the competition this season (40.8%), it was no surprise that Arsenal were the team whose attacking game was built more on organised possession.
当拜仁在本赛季的比赛中控球率最低(40.8%)的那个晚上,阿森纳成为进攻比赛更多地建立在有组织的控球基础上的球队也就不足为奇了。
Mikel Arteta's men had more actions in the attacking third than Bayern and, as the above graphic shows, more than two-thirds (68%) of their entries into the final third came during periods of organised possession (versus a low block).Bayern, with less of the ball, relied more on springing forward quickly. As the chart displays, they looked for breakthroughs (19% to Arsenal's 2%) – in other words, playing through the high press or middle block to progress higher up the pitch – and also for counterattacks, which meant creating opportunities after regaining the ball in their own half (28% compared to just 2% from Arsenal).
米克尔·阿尔特塔的球队在进攻三区的行动比拜仁更多,如上图所示,他们进入进攻三区的次数超过三分之二(68%)是在有组织控球期间(相对于低位阻挡)。 球权较少的拜仁更多地依靠快速前插。如图表所示,他们寻求突破(19%,阿森纳为 2%)——换句话说,通过高位逼抢或中路拦网,向前推进——同时也寻求反击,这意味着在夺回球权后创造机会在自己的半场(28%,而阿森纳的这一比例仅为 2%)。
Champions League Performance Insight: Arsenal's organised possession
欧冠表现洞察:阿森纳有组织的控球
The video above illustrates the difference between a final-third entry following organised possession and a breakthrough, showing first Arsenal on the ball in the lead-up to Bukayo Saka's opening goal and then a quick Bayern attack.
上面的视频展示了有组织控球后的最后三区进攻和突破之间的区别,显示了在布卡约·萨卡率先进球之前阿森纳控球,然后是拜仁的快速进攻。
How the teams got to the final third 球队如何进入最后三区
The focus of this second section is how the two sides progressed to the final third in last Tuesday's fixture – and as the chart reveals, both sought to explore space behind the last line of defence with through balls.Additionally, we can see that Arsenal, with their greater share of possession, looked to play through the shape more than Bayern (with 14% of their progressions from inside penetrative passes). The north London side also had slightly more outside penetrations (26%) than their visitors (22%). As an additional point, Arsenal's efforts to penetrate on the outside were also reflected by the fact their wingers accounted for 40% of the balls received when their team advanced to the final third.
第二节的焦点是双方如何在上周二的比赛中进入最后三分之一——正如图表所示,双方都试图通过直塞球探索最后一道防线后面的空间。 此外,我们可以看到,拥有更大控球权的阿森纳比拜仁更注重通过阵型进行比赛(他们有 14% 的进攻来自内线渗透传球)。北伦敦方面的外部渗透率 (26%) 也略高于其访客 (22%)。另外,阿森纳在外线渗透的努力还体现在当球队进入最后三区时,他们的边锋占到了40%的球权。
Champions League Performance Insight: Sane individual run
欧冠表现洞察:萨内个人表现
As for Bayern, they had a greater dependence on individual actions (28%). This was a match in which both Leroy Sané and Jamal Musiala demonstrated their ability to carry the ball – and the video above shows the individual action by Sané which brought Bayern's penalty. Overall, Sané recorded an average carry distance of 9.9m which was the highest of any player who started in the quarter-final first-leg matches.
至于拜仁,他们对个人行为的依赖程度更大(28%)。这场比赛中,勒罗伊·萨内和贾马尔·穆西亚拉都展示了他们的带球能力——上面的视频显示了萨内的个人动作,为拜仁带来了点球。总体而言,萨内的平均带球距离为9.9m,是四分之一决赛首回合首发球员中最高的。
Teams entering the penalty box 球队如何进入禁区
The next aspect to consider is how the teams got into the opposition penalty area – and the 'individual actions' category emphasises how the sides differed in their approach here. In Bayern's case, individual actions – of the kind seen in the previous video – accounted for more than two-thirds (67%) of their penalty-box entries.Arsenal have individuals with the ability to penetrate defences yet they progressed via a wider variety of means – individual actions (20%), through balls (23%), crosses (27%) and even throw-ins (17%).
下一个要考虑的方面是球队如何进入对方禁区——“个人行动”类别强调双方在此处的做法有何不同。在拜仁的案例中,个人行为——就像之前视频中看到的那样——占了他们禁区内三分之二以上(67%)的比例。 阿森纳拥有突破防守能力的个人,但他们通过更广泛的方式取得进步——个人行动(20%)、直塞球(23%)、传中(27%)甚至界外球(17%)。
Champions League Performance Insight: Rice through-ball
欧冠表现洞察:赖斯直传球
This third video offers an example of a through ball from the English side with the angled pass by Declan Rice beyond the Bayern backline for Saka to run onto. For the record, Rice ended the match with the joint-highest number of line-breaking passes into the attacking third alongside substitute Oleksandr Zinchenko (five each).As observed in this previous article by UEFA match observer Rafael Benítez, Arsenal's high pressing and energy were other significant features of their performance against the German champions. This is seen in the additional fact that two-fifths (41%) of Arsenal's shots came after they had won the ball in the opposition half (33% from pressing regains, 8% from transitions).
第三个视频提供了英格兰队直塞球的例子,德克兰·赖斯(Declan Rice)将斜传球越过拜仁队的后线,让萨卡(Saka)跑过去。赖斯打破了比赛记录,与替补出场的亚历山大·津琴科(各 5 次)一起,以并列最多的突破线传球进入进攻三区的方式结束了比赛。 正如欧足联比赛观察员拉斐尔·贝尼特斯在上一篇文章中所观察到的那样,阿森纳的高逼抢和活力是他们对阵德国冠军球队的另一个显着特征。从另一个事实中可以看出,阿森纳五分之二(41%)的射门是在对方半场赢得球权后进行的(33%来自抢夺球权,8%来自攻防转换)。
Arsenal’s right-flank focus 阿森纳的右翼焦点
In his analysis, Benítez also highlighted Arsenal's productive efforts along their right flank, particularly in the opening period. "With [Martin] Ødegaard on the right, between the lines, and with [full-back Ben] White higher even than Saka sometimes, they were a threat," he said. The 3D animation above emphasises this point, showing that more than half (57%) of the home team's penalty-box entry attempts came on the right side (lane 4).The final video below gives an example of this right-sided threat, showing White high up the pitch as he collects a pass from Kai Havertz and gets in an attempt on goal in the opening period.
在他的分析中,贝尼特斯还强调了阿森纳在右翼的富有成效的努力,特别是在开局阶段。 “马丁厄德高在右路,在两条线之间,边后卫本怀特有时甚至比萨卡更高,他们是一个威胁,”他说。上面的 3D 动画强调了这一点,显示超过一半 (57%) 的主队进入禁区尝试来自右侧(第 4 道)。 下面的最后一个视频给出了这种右路威胁的例子,展示了怀特在开场阶段接到凯·哈弗茨的传球并尝试射门时在球场上的高位。
Champions League Performance Insight: Arsenal's right-flank focus
欧冠表现洞察:阿森纳的右翼焦点
本文摘自欧冠官网UEFA.com
COYG!制作不易,欢迎支持本怀特!