第五帖---考研英语新题型解题技巧总结（篇一）由林深时见鹿456 发表在步行街主干道 https://bbs.hupu.com/topic-daily
已陆续更新四帖，承蒙各位厚爱，1500左右的学弟学妹关注，声望值蹿升到10000+，每天咨询问题的学弟学妹太多了，这两天抽个空，把新题型的解题技巧做一个总结，新题型解题技巧较为零碎，不是一篇帖子能说清楚的，所以我准备分一二三，陆续更新几篇帖子，尽量将这个题型讲的清楚透彻，如果想了解更多技巧和信息，可以关注我的头条号：林深时见鹿456，后期我会更新视频，将各种大家遇见的通用型问题进行总结，以期能够帮助大家更好地备考。有问题或者需要资料可以加我的微信youpomian456或者QQ 1467323235联系，浅薄之见，我定尽力解决大家的备考问题。
截止目前，陆续更新十帖地址如下：
英语篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/36046905.html
数学篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/36221131.html
政治篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/36367324.html
完形填空篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/36536455.html
新题型排序篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/36641059.html
新题型七选五篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/36702099.html
新题型小标题篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/36727750.html
清华备考技术篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/36807080.html
翻译篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/37025200.html
作文篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/37148615.html
先说一下新题型的类型和特点：
2010 排序/六选五
2011 排序
2012 七选五
2013 七选五
2014 排序
2015 七选五
2016 小标题
2017 排序
2018 排序
2019 排序
2020 七选五
从这张表格我们可以看到，近11年排序题目占了6/11，七选五4/11，小标题1/11，共同的特点都是选错一个会影响后面两到三个选项的正确选择，失分4-6分很正常，不同点是做题方法略有不同，今天这一片我准备先讲排序题目的做题方法。后面会陆续更新七选五和小标题题型的解题技巧。
排序题一般是七个选项随机排列，其中会有两个选项的位置已经固定，要求将剩下的五个选项按照顺序排列正确，特殊的是2010年，其实这一年是有名的难，在新题型里面是七个选项，但是又一个选项是错误选项，排除这个错误选项的前提下，固定一个选项，剩余五个选项按照顺序排列正确，这个难度就陡然增加了，不单是要求排列，还要求六选五，所以这一年的得分率甚低，学生怨声载道，所幸这十年来，新题型都不再采用这种形式，难度降低了不少。但是新题型排序题往往内容较为艰涩，话题往往比较生僻，陌生词也较多，往往让学生感觉真的好难，但是真正深究起来没有你们难，所以大家大胆去做，细心去探究，我相信大家只要掌握了相应的技巧，完成了对应的训练，戳破这层窗户纸，拿个6分以上甚至满分并不是难事，所以请大家充满信心。
闲话不表，直入正题---排序题的解题方法。
一、抱着开放态度通读全文、尽量确定某些先后顺序。
为什么要强调以开放态度通读全文？做顺序题目最忌陷入为主，一旦一个错，后面就有可能错两到三个，所以不要先试图把某种顺序看的很死，更多的是宽泛确定，能确定的确定，不能确定的我们后面再说，通读全文的目的就是为了了解个大概，获得尽可能多的信息点，做排序题目经常需要来回论证，我们确定了一个点对下一个点的确定是有帮助的，要在前一个基础之上循环确定，而不是一下子把所有的选项做出来，所以大家大可不必着急，一点点来，开放性地看待问题甚为重要。为什么说尽量确定某些先后顺序？是不是跟开放性有矛盾？不是的，这里的确定某些先后顺序指的是粗略确定谁先谁后，不需要谁跟着谁，比如说我确定利用某些逻辑词确定A选项在D选项之后，但是A选项是不是紧跟D选项我不管，我只需要在纸上写明白A在D之后即可，起码我确定了一种关系顺序，有利于我后期判断，所以越多的线索和关系越有利于我们排序，不管这个线索和关系是否直接。这里要强调的是一定要关注逻辑词和指代词的指示作用。写几个常用的作为例证。
besides 另外。其前面必然有相应的信息作为映衬。
conclude 总结。其前面必然有各种例子或者原因以供总结
for example 例如。其前面必然有观点性或者总结性的论点
the first .......the second 第一，第二。用来做排列论述，其前面必有概括性信息
in another case 在另一种情况下。前面必有 in one case 与之对应
his 他的。前面必然有相应具体的人名
其实这种例证是举不完的，逻辑词和指代词特别多，各个文章也千变万化，但是这些词很容易看出来，以此我们可以完成对于前后大约顺序的一个认识，有利于我们快速确定某些顺序甚至是前后是具体答案，我们来看2017年的新题型。
[A]The first published sketch, “A Dinner at Poplar Walk” brought tears to Dickens’s eyes when he discovered it in the pages of The Monthly Magazine. From then on his sketches ,which appeared under the pen name “Boz” in The Evening Chronicle, earned him a modest reputation.
[B]The runaway success of The Pickwick Papers, as it is generally known today, secured Dickens’s fame. There were Pickwick coats and Pickwick cigars, and the plump, spectacled hero, Samuel Pickwick, became a national figure.
[C]Soon after Sketches by Boz appeared, a publishing firm approached Dickens to write a story in monthly installments, as a backdrop for a series of woodcuts by the ten-famous artist Robert Seymour, who had originated the idea for the story. With characteristic confidence, Dickens successfully insisted that Seymour’s pictures illustrate his own story instead. After the first installment, Dickens wrote to the artist and asked him to correct a drawing Dickens felt was not faithful enough to his prose. Seymour made the change, went into his backyard, and expressed his displeasure by committing suicide. Dickens and his publishers simply pressed on with a new artist. The comic novel, The Posthumous Papers of the Pickwick Club, appeared serially in 1836 and 1837, and was first published in book form in 1837.
[G] After Pickwick, Dickens plunged into a bleaker world. In Oliver Twist, e traces an orphan’s progress from the workhouse to the criminal slums of London. Nicholas Nickleby, his next novel, combines the darkness of Oliver Twist with the sunlight of Pickwick. The popularity of these novels consolidated Dichens’ as a nationally and internationally celebrated man of letters.
我们来看C选项第一句Soon after Sketches by Boz appeared，这句话里面soon after这个逻辑词告诉我们前面必有关于Boz的东西，而A选项末尾的那句话which appeared under the pen name “Boz” in The Evening Chronicle, earned him a modest reputation，直接点名了Boz，说明A必在C之前，但是至于A是不是紧挨着C，我们不敢妄下断言，没关系，我们在纸上写上A在C之前即可，能确定的我们确定，不能确定的我们要有一个开放的心态，不着急。我们来看G选项的首句，After Pickwick，由这个after我们可以知道前面必有关于pickwich的东西，而且必是具体说明，B选项首句The runaway success of The Pickwick Papers，注意这里的关于pickWich的东西是全程，那么B选项必然在G选项之前，由答案的固定选项我们知道B选项后面只有一个空格，而G选项又必然在B选项之后，我们可以果断将G选项的位置进行确认，所以由逻辑词我们确定能确定的，不能确定的不可硬上，要保持开放的心态，以免一错导致再错。
二、重点关注特征词，对不认识的单词和话题要有心理准备
何为特征词？特征词指的是那些文章中起关键作用的预示特征的词汇，实际上我们会发现新题型里面有特别多的文章我们几乎看不懂，涉及的话题我们也不熟悉，有的是美国修了哪一个建筑，有的是Dickens的生平，这些内容我们根本不熟悉嘛，离我们的生活远的不能再远了，我们基本上毫无背景信息。而且词汇很多都是专有词汇，我们根本看不懂的好不好，什么走廊、什么穹顶、什么法西斯，这些词汇我们几乎不可能涉及过。命题老师是要为难我们吗？不是的，就是为了吓我们的，事实上大部分的超纲词汇出现在新题型里面，命题老师就是想让我们在看不懂单词的情况下去筛选出特征词，抽丝剥茧，慢慢捋清线索，顺着线索去做题，所以要明白特征词的重要性是无以复加的，甚至是决定成败的，大家看不懂单词无所谓，话题不了解也无所谓，如果特征词抓不住就麻烦了。我们来看2018年的新题型。
D. Many of the most celebrated national figures have participated in historical events that have taken place within the EEOB's granite walls. Theodore and Franklin D. Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Lyndon B. Johnson, Gerald Ford, and George H. W. Bush all had offices in this building before becoming president. It has housed 16 Secretaries of the Navy, 21 Secretaries of War, and 24 Secretaries of State. Winston Churchill once walked its corridors and Japanese emissaries met here with Secretary of State Cordell Hull after the bombing of Pearl Harbor.
E. The Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB) commands a unique position in both the national history and the architectural heritage of the United States. Designed by Supervising Architect of the Treasury, Alfred B. Mullett, it was built from 1871 to 1888 to house the growing staffs of the State, War, and Navy Departments, and is considered one of the best examples of French Second Empire architecture in the country.
F. Construction took 17 years as the building slowly rose wing by wing. When the EEOB was finished, it was the largest office building in Washington, with nearly 2 miles of black and white tiled corridors. Almost all of the interior detail is of cast iron or plaster; the use of wood was minimized to insure fire safety. Eight monumental curving staircases of granite with over 4,000 individually cast bronze balusters are capped by four skylight domes and two stained glass rotundas.
G. The history of the EEOB began long before its foundations were laid. The first executive offices were constructed between 1799 and 1820. A series of fires (including those set by the British in 1814) and overcrowded conditions led to the construction of the existing Treasury Building. In 1866, the construction of the North Wing of the Treasury Building necessitated the demolition of the State Department building.
D、E、F、G四个选项之中都出现了一个特征词EEOB，要知道文章是不会直接拿一个缩写的东西直接来的，EEOB这个词前面必然有专门的解释或细化，我们发现E选项里面出现了对于EEOB 的具体解释，所以我们知道E选项必然在D、F、G选项之前，答案中已经确定了F的位置，顺理成章我们就将E选项的位置限制在只有两个空格的范围之内，辅以其他方面的判定，其实我们轻轻松松就能确定前三个选项的具体位置，一分钟之内就能拿到4分，而且为我们后面的判断打下基础，这篇文章看着很难，其实我们庖丁解牛，略施小计就能拿到比较高的分数，而且非常快速。
三、总结段落主旨，理清逻辑顺序
其实这种方法用的没有前两种那么多，但是也是一种比较常见的方法，任何文章都是有比较清晰的段落逻辑在其中的，归纳每一段的段落大意，非常有利于我们抓住前后自然段的逻辑顺序，对于排序题目这种方法其实是基本方法，但是往往基本方法大家使用不是那么多，因为基本方法可能比较稳，但是速度比较慢。所以这种方法大家可以作为备用方法来使用。例如2019年新题型。
A. These tools can help you win every argument-not in the unhelpful sense of beating your opponents but in the better sense of learning about the issues that divide people.learning why they disagree with us and learning to talk and work together with them. If we readjust our view of arguments –from a verbal fight or tennis game to a reasoned exchange through which we all gain mutual respect, and understanding---then we change the very nature of what it means to “win” an argument.
B. Of course,many discussions are not so successful. Still, we need to be careful not to accuse opponents of bad arguments too quickly. We need to learn how to evaluate them properly. A large part of evaluation is calling out bad arguments, but we also need to admit good arguments by opponents and to apply the same critical standards to ourselves. Humility requires you to recognize weakness in your own arguments and sometimes also to accept reasons on the oppsite side.
C. None of these will be easy but you can start even if others refuse to. Next time you state your position, formulate an argument for what you claim and honestly ask yourself whether your argument is any good. Next time you talk with someone who takes a stand, ask them to give you a reason for their view. Spell out their argument fully and charitably. Assess its strength impartially. Raise objections and listen carefully to their replies.
D. Carnegie would be right if arguments were fights, which is how we often think of them. Like physical fights, verbal fights can leave both sides bloodied. Even when you win, you end up no better off. Your prospects would be almost as dismal if arguments were even just competitions-like, say, tennis games. Pairs of opponents hit the ball back and forth until one winner emerges from all who entered. Everybody else loses. This kind of thinking is why so many people try to avoid arguments, especially about politics and religion.
E. In his 1936 work How to Win Friends and Influence People, Dale Carnegie wrote: "There is only one way...to get the best of an argument-and that is to avoid it. "This aversion to arguments is common, but it depends on a mistaken view of arguments that causes profound problems for our personal and social lives- and in many ways misses the point of arguing in the first place.
F. These views of arguments also undermine reason. If you see a conversation as a fight or competition, you can win by cheating as long as you don't get caught. You will be happy to convince people with bad arguments. You can call their views stupid, or joke about how ignorant they are. None of these tricks will help you understand them, their positions or the issues that divide you, but they can help you win-in one way.
G. There is a better way to win arguments. Imagine that you favor increasing the minimum wage in our state, and I do not. If you yell, “Yes,”and I yell. “No,” neither of us learns anything. We neither understand nor respect each other, and we have no basis for compromise or cooperation. In contrast, suppose you give a reasonable argument: that full-time workers should not have to live in poverty. Then I counter with another reasonable argument: that a higher minimum wage will force businesses to employ fewer people for less time. Now we can understand each other's positions and recognize our shared values, since we both care about needy workers.
其实这道题即便是抛开固定选项，单靠总结段落主旨，我们也能做对题目。我们来挨个分析段落主旨
A选项：这些方法可以让我们解决分歧，赢得相互尊重和理解
B选项：许多讨论并不会那么成功，我们不应过快指责对方，而应该谦卑
C选项：这些不易做到，我们要开始行动去做到理性和谦卑
D选项：如果如卡耐基所言，争论就是斗争的话，那么就是一场你死我活的竞争
E选项：卡耐基反对争论，是因为他对争论的看法是错误的，忽略了争论的关键所在
F选项：将争论视为斗争，将削弱理性成分
G选项：有一种更好的方法来赢得争论（举例）
如果梳理完这些内容，我们很容易发现，作者现用卡耐基的例子作为反驳，然后写出自己关于争论的观点，要去相互理解，那么这条主线就很容易列出来了，答案也清晰明了，即使答案不给我们固定，我们也能顺理成章写出正确顺序 E-D-F-G-B-C-A。
四、平心静气和一些基本认知
新题型往往生僻单词甚多，偶尔还有可能感觉千头万绪，所以一旦做的不顺利往往心浮气躁，而新题型考得就是对于线索的抽丝剥茧，越急越无法发现线索和细节，所以大家要有一个心理预判，不要急，做的不顺利很正常，只要我们耐心去寻找发现，总能发现相应的点和线索，而且很容易一个或两个线索一通百通，直接将所有的答案找出来，所以平心静气非常重要。另外还有一点小认知，不是特别科学，往往越难读懂的题目越好做，因为虽然我们读不懂，但是线索往往很明显，稍微寻找就能很快发现，反而如果我们能读的特别透彻的题目往往答案却不一定好选，因为线索可能没有那么明显，这也算一点不算规律的规律吧，希望大家遇到难题不要慌，遇到容易的题目也不要高兴太早。
好了，就写这么多吧，这是关于排序题目的一些浅薄做法，后面将陆续更新新题型七选五和小标题技巧的篇二和篇三，欢迎大家指正，轻骂多点赞。
已陆续更新四帖，承蒙各位厚爱，1500左右的学弟学妹关注，声望值蹿升到10000+，每天咨询问题的学弟学妹太多了，这两天抽个空，把新题型的解题技巧做一个总结，新题型解题技巧较为零碎，不是一篇帖子能说清楚的，所以我准备分一二三，陆续更新几篇帖子，尽量将这个题型讲的清楚透彻，如果想了解更多技巧和信息，可以关注我的头条号：林深时见鹿456，后期我会更新视频，将各种大家遇见的通用型问题进行总结，以期能够帮助大家更好地备考。有问题或者需要资料可以加我的微信youpomian456或者QQ 1467323235联系，浅薄之见，我定尽力解决大家的备考问题。
截止目前，陆续更新十帖地址如下：
英语篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/36046905.html
数学篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/36221131.html
政治篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/36367324.html
完形填空篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/36536455.html
新题型排序篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/36641059.html
新题型七选五篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/36702099.html
新题型小标题篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/36727750.html
清华备考技术篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/36807080.html
翻译篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/37025200.html
作文篇：https://bbs.hupu.com/37148615.html
先说一下新题型的类型和特点：
2010 排序/六选五
2011 排序
2012 七选五
2013 七选五
2014 排序
2015 七选五
2016 小标题
2017 排序
2018 排序
2019 排序
2020 七选五
从这张表格我们可以看到，近11年排序题目占了6/11，七选五4/11，小标题1/11，共同的特点都是选错一个会影响后面两到三个选项的正确选择，失分4-6分很正常，不同点是做题方法略有不同，今天这一片我准备先讲排序题目的做题方法。后面会陆续更新七选五和小标题题型的解题技巧。
排序题一般是七个选项随机排列，其中会有两个选项的位置已经固定，要求将剩下的五个选项按照顺序排列正确，特殊的是2010年，其实这一年是有名的难，在新题型里面是七个选项，但是又一个选项是错误选项，排除这个错误选项的前提下，固定一个选项，剩余五个选项按照顺序排列正确，这个难度就陡然增加了，不单是要求排列，还要求六选五，所以这一年的得分率甚低，学生怨声载道，所幸这十年来，新题型都不再采用这种形式，难度降低了不少。但是新题型排序题往往内容较为艰涩，话题往往比较生僻，陌生词也较多，往往让学生感觉真的好难，但是真正深究起来没有你们难，所以大家大胆去做，细心去探究，我相信大家只要掌握了相应的技巧，完成了对应的训练，戳破这层窗户纸，拿个6分以上甚至满分并不是难事，所以请大家充满信心。
闲话不表，直入正题---排序题的解题方法。
一、抱着开放态度通读全文、尽量确定某些先后顺序。
为什么要强调以开放态度通读全文？做顺序题目最忌陷入为主，一旦一个错，后面就有可能错两到三个，所以不要先试图把某种顺序看的很死，更多的是宽泛确定，能确定的确定，不能确定的我们后面再说，通读全文的目的就是为了了解个大概，获得尽可能多的信息点，做排序题目经常需要来回论证，我们确定了一个点对下一个点的确定是有帮助的，要在前一个基础之上循环确定，而不是一下子把所有的选项做出来，所以大家大可不必着急，一点点来，开放性地看待问题甚为重要。为什么说尽量确定某些先后顺序？是不是跟开放性有矛盾？不是的，这里的确定某些先后顺序指的是粗略确定谁先谁后，不需要谁跟着谁，比如说我确定利用某些逻辑词确定A选项在D选项之后，但是A选项是不是紧跟D选项我不管，我只需要在纸上写明白A在D之后即可，起码我确定了一种关系顺序，有利于我后期判断，所以越多的线索和关系越有利于我们排序，不管这个线索和关系是否直接。这里要强调的是一定要关注逻辑词和指代词的指示作用。写几个常用的作为例证。
besides 另外。其前面必然有相应的信息作为映衬。
conclude 总结。其前面必然有各种例子或者原因以供总结
for example 例如。其前面必然有观点性或者总结性的论点
the first .......the second 第一，第二。用来做排列论述，其前面必有概括性信息
in another case 在另一种情况下。前面必有 in one case 与之对应
his 他的。前面必然有相应具体的人名
其实这种例证是举不完的，逻辑词和指代词特别多，各个文章也千变万化，但是这些词很容易看出来，以此我们可以完成对于前后大约顺序的一个认识，有利于我们快速确定某些顺序甚至是前后是具体答案，我们来看2017年的新题型。
[A]The first published sketch, “A Dinner at Poplar Walk” brought tears to Dickens’s eyes when he discovered it in the pages of The Monthly Magazine. From then on his sketches ,which appeared under the pen name “Boz” in The Evening Chronicle, earned him a modest reputation.
[B]The runaway success of The Pickwick Papers, as it is generally known today, secured Dickens’s fame. There were Pickwick coats and Pickwick cigars, and the plump, spectacled hero, Samuel Pickwick, became a national figure.
[C]Soon after Sketches by Boz appeared, a publishing firm approached Dickens to write a story in monthly installments, as a backdrop for a series of woodcuts by the ten-famous artist Robert Seymour, who had originated the idea for the story. With characteristic confidence, Dickens successfully insisted that Seymour’s pictures illustrate his own story instead. After the first installment, Dickens wrote to the artist and asked him to correct a drawing Dickens felt was not faithful enough to his prose. Seymour made the change, went into his backyard, and expressed his displeasure by committing suicide. Dickens and his publishers simply pressed on with a new artist. The comic novel, The Posthumous Papers of the Pickwick Club, appeared serially in 1836 and 1837, and was first published in book form in 1837.
[G] After Pickwick, Dickens plunged into a bleaker world. In Oliver Twist, e traces an orphan’s progress from the workhouse to the criminal slums of London. Nicholas Nickleby, his next novel, combines the darkness of Oliver Twist with the sunlight of Pickwick. The popularity of these novels consolidated Dichens’ as a nationally and internationally celebrated man of letters.
我们来看C选项第一句Soon after Sketches by Boz appeared，这句话里面soon after这个逻辑词告诉我们前面必有关于Boz的东西，而A选项末尾的那句话which appeared under the pen name “Boz” in The Evening Chronicle, earned him a modest reputation，直接点名了Boz，说明A必在C之前，但是至于A是不是紧挨着C，我们不敢妄下断言，没关系，我们在纸上写上A在C之前即可，能确定的我们确定，不能确定的我们要有一个开放的心态，不着急。我们来看G选项的首句，After Pickwick，由这个after我们可以知道前面必有关于pickwich的东西，而且必是具体说明，B选项首句The runaway success of The Pickwick Papers，注意这里的关于pickWich的东西是全程，那么B选项必然在G选项之前，由答案的固定选项我们知道B选项后面只有一个空格，而G选项又必然在B选项之后，我们可以果断将G选项的位置进行确认，所以由逻辑词我们确定能确定的，不能确定的不可硬上，要保持开放的心态，以免一错导致再错。
二、重点关注特征词，对不认识的单词和话题要有心理准备
何为特征词？特征词指的是那些文章中起关键作用的预示特征的词汇，实际上我们会发现新题型里面有特别多的文章我们几乎看不懂，涉及的话题我们也不熟悉，有的是美国修了哪一个建筑，有的是Dickens的生平，这些内容我们根本不熟悉嘛，离我们的生活远的不能再远了，我们基本上毫无背景信息。而且词汇很多都是专有词汇，我们根本看不懂的好不好，什么走廊、什么穹顶、什么法西斯，这些词汇我们几乎不可能涉及过。命题老师是要为难我们吗？不是的，就是为了吓我们的，事实上大部分的超纲词汇出现在新题型里面，命题老师就是想让我们在看不懂单词的情况下去筛选出特征词，抽丝剥茧，慢慢捋清线索，顺着线索去做题，所以要明白特征词的重要性是无以复加的，甚至是决定成败的，大家看不懂单词无所谓，话题不了解也无所谓，如果特征词抓不住就麻烦了。我们来看2018年的新题型。
D. Many of the most celebrated national figures have participated in historical events that have taken place within the EEOB's granite walls. Theodore and Franklin D. Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Lyndon B. Johnson, Gerald Ford, and George H. W. Bush all had offices in this building before becoming president. It has housed 16 Secretaries of the Navy, 21 Secretaries of War, and 24 Secretaries of State. Winston Churchill once walked its corridors and Japanese emissaries met here with Secretary of State Cordell Hull after the bombing of Pearl Harbor.
E. The Eisenhower Executive Office Building (EEOB) commands a unique position in both the national history and the architectural heritage of the United States. Designed by Supervising Architect of the Treasury, Alfred B. Mullett, it was built from 1871 to 1888 to house the growing staffs of the State, War, and Navy Departments, and is considered one of the best examples of French Second Empire architecture in the country.
F. Construction took 17 years as the building slowly rose wing by wing. When the EEOB was finished, it was the largest office building in Washington, with nearly 2 miles of black and white tiled corridors. Almost all of the interior detail is of cast iron or plaster; the use of wood was minimized to insure fire safety. Eight monumental curving staircases of granite with over 4,000 individually cast bronze balusters are capped by four skylight domes and two stained glass rotundas.
G. The history of the EEOB began long before its foundations were laid. The first executive offices were constructed between 1799 and 1820. A series of fires (including those set by the British in 1814) and overcrowded conditions led to the construction of the existing Treasury Building. In 1866, the construction of the North Wing of the Treasury Building necessitated the demolition of the State Department building.
D、E、F、G四个选项之中都出现了一个特征词EEOB，要知道文章是不会直接拿一个缩写的东西直接来的，EEOB这个词前面必然有专门的解释或细化，我们发现E选项里面出现了对于EEOB 的具体解释，所以我们知道E选项必然在D、F、G选项之前，答案中已经确定了F的位置，顺理成章我们就将E选项的位置限制在只有两个空格的范围之内，辅以其他方面的判定，其实我们轻轻松松就能确定前三个选项的具体位置，一分钟之内就能拿到4分，而且为我们后面的判断打下基础，这篇文章看着很难，其实我们庖丁解牛，略施小计就能拿到比较高的分数，而且非常快速。
三、总结段落主旨，理清逻辑顺序
其实这种方法用的没有前两种那么多，但是也是一种比较常见的方法，任何文章都是有比较清晰的段落逻辑在其中的，归纳每一段的段落大意，非常有利于我们抓住前后自然段的逻辑顺序，对于排序题目这种方法其实是基本方法，但是往往基本方法大家使用不是那么多，因为基本方法可能比较稳，但是速度比较慢。所以这种方法大家可以作为备用方法来使用。例如2019年新题型。
A. These tools can help you win every argument-not in the unhelpful sense of beating your opponents but in the better sense of learning about the issues that divide people.learning why they disagree with us and learning to talk and work together with them. If we readjust our view of arguments –from a verbal fight or tennis game to a reasoned exchange through which we all gain mutual respect, and understanding---then we change the very nature of what it means to “win” an argument.
B. Of course,many discussions are not so successful. Still, we need to be careful not to accuse opponents of bad arguments too quickly. We need to learn how to evaluate them properly. A large part of evaluation is calling out bad arguments, but we also need to admit good arguments by opponents and to apply the same critical standards to ourselves. Humility requires you to recognize weakness in your own arguments and sometimes also to accept reasons on the oppsite side.
C. None of these will be easy but you can start even if others refuse to. Next time you state your position, formulate an argument for what you claim and honestly ask yourself whether your argument is any good. Next time you talk with someone who takes a stand, ask them to give you a reason for their view. Spell out their argument fully and charitably. Assess its strength impartially. Raise objections and listen carefully to their replies.
D. Carnegie would be right if arguments were fights, which is how we often think of them. Like physical fights, verbal fights can leave both sides bloodied. Even when you win, you end up no better off. Your prospects would be almost as dismal if arguments were even just competitions-like, say, tennis games. Pairs of opponents hit the ball back and forth until one winner emerges from all who entered. Everybody else loses. This kind of thinking is why so many people try to avoid arguments, especially about politics and religion.
E. In his 1936 work How to Win Friends and Influence People, Dale Carnegie wrote: "There is only one way...to get the best of an argument-and that is to avoid it. "This aversion to arguments is common, but it depends on a mistaken view of arguments that causes profound problems for our personal and social lives- and in many ways misses the point of arguing in the first place.
F. These views of arguments also undermine reason. If you see a conversation as a fight or competition, you can win by cheating as long as you don't get caught. You will be happy to convince people with bad arguments. You can call their views stupid, or joke about how ignorant they are. None of these tricks will help you understand them, their positions or the issues that divide you, but they can help you win-in one way.
G. There is a better way to win arguments. Imagine that you favor increasing the minimum wage in our state, and I do not. If you yell, “Yes,”and I yell. “No,” neither of us learns anything. We neither understand nor respect each other, and we have no basis for compromise or cooperation. In contrast, suppose you give a reasonable argument: that full-time workers should not have to live in poverty. Then I counter with another reasonable argument: that a higher minimum wage will force businesses to employ fewer people for less time. Now we can understand each other's positions and recognize our shared values, since we both care about needy workers.
其实这道题即便是抛开固定选项，单靠总结段落主旨，我们也能做对题目。我们来挨个分析段落主旨
A选项：这些方法可以让我们解决分歧，赢得相互尊重和理解
B选项：许多讨论并不会那么成功，我们不应过快指责对方，而应该谦卑
C选项：这些不易做到，我们要开始行动去做到理性和谦卑
D选项：如果如卡耐基所言，争论就是斗争的话，那么就是一场你死我活的竞争
E选项：卡耐基反对争论，是因为他对争论的看法是错误的，忽略了争论的关键所在
F选项：将争论视为斗争，将削弱理性成分
G选项：有一种更好的方法来赢得争论（举例）
如果梳理完这些内容，我们很容易发现，作者现用卡耐基的例子作为反驳，然后写出自己关于争论的观点，要去相互理解，那么这条主线就很容易列出来了，答案也清晰明了，即使答案不给我们固定，我们也能顺理成章写出正确顺序 E-D-F-G-B-C-A。
四、平心静气和一些基本认知
新题型往往生僻单词甚多，偶尔还有可能感觉千头万绪，所以一旦做的不顺利往往心浮气躁，而新题型考得就是对于线索的抽丝剥茧，越急越无法发现线索和细节，所以大家要有一个心理预判，不要急，做的不顺利很正常，只要我们耐心去寻找发现，总能发现相应的点和线索，而且很容易一个或两个线索一通百通，直接将所有的答案找出来，所以平心静气非常重要。另外还有一点小认知，不是特别科学，往往越难读懂的题目越好做，因为虽然我们读不懂，但是线索往往很明显，稍微寻找就能很快发现，反而如果我们能读的特别透彻的题目往往答案却不一定好选，因为线索可能没有那么明显，这也算一点不算规律的规律吧，希望大家遇到难题不要慌，遇到容易的题目也不要高兴太早。
好了，就写这么多吧，这是关于排序题目的一些浅薄做法，后面将陆续更新新题型七选五和小标题技巧的篇二和篇三，欢迎大家指正，轻骂多点赞。
推荐 (248)
评论 (99)
收藏
分享
举报
只看楼主
