来源：Formula World
红牛将聘请律师调查车祸
马科博士首先解释了他们聘请律师的原因：
“他（律师）应该在体育法的框架内调查车手在这种情况下可以做什么”
他重申了为什么他认为汉密尔顿应该被禁赛：
“我们很幸运，Max 没有发生任何严重的事情。车坏了，发动机也可能坏了。你不能让让我们承担这些，将Lewis禁赛是合理的。”
他进一步对汉密尔顿收到的 10 秒罚时发表了自己的看法，并将其与佩雷斯之前在比赛中的处罚进行了对比。
“这是荒谬的，但或许比赛规则本身有很大的局限性也应该被指责。规则应该被修改，包括赛事干事制度”
“佩雷斯在奥地利两次被罚 5 秒，因为那是轻微的碰撞并且没有造成任何车辆起飞。他们本可以罚汉密尔顿通过维修区停10秒，但他们也没有那样做。”
他通过解释问题的严重性来总结他的话：
“Max在他的赛车线上，汉密尔顿也在那个地方，他必须松开油门。在最快的弯道之一你绝对不能撞到对手的后轮，最轻的触碰都会带来致命的后果。所以，这是一个不负责任的行为。汉密尔顿需要知道后果是什么。”
原文：
Red Bull Hire Lawyer To Investigate Crash
Marko started off by explaining why they hired the lawyer
“He [the lawyer] should check what you could do in such a situation within the framework of the sports law”
He reiterated why he feels Hamilton should have received a race suspension
“We are lucky that nothing serious has happened to Max. The car is broken and the engine probably too. You can't let that sit on you. A suspension would be justified”
He further gave his thoughts on the 10-second penalty that Hamilton received instead and contrasted that with Perez’ penalties from the race before
“That’s ridiculous. But maybe the regulations are also to blame for being relatively restricted. The law should be revised, including the stewards’ system”
“Perez got five seconds twice in Austria because there was marginal contact without anyone flying off. You could have given a drive-through penalty plus ten seconds for Hamilton. But they didn’t do that either”
He summed up his words by explaining how serious the issue is
“Max was on his line, where Hamilton was, he has to lift off the throttle. You cannot hit your opponent on the rear wheel in one of the fastest corners, the lightest touch has fatal consequences. So, an irresponsible action. Hamilton needs to know what the consequences are”
来源：Formula World
红牛将聘请律师调查车祸
马科博士首先解释了他们聘请律师的原因：
“他（律师）应该在体育法的框架内调查车手在这种情况下可以做什么”
他重申了为什么他认为汉密尔顿应该被禁赛：
“我们很幸运，Max 没有发生任何严重的事情。车坏了，发动机也可能坏了。你不能让让我们承担这些，将Lewis禁赛是合理的。”
他进一步对汉密尔顿收到的 10 秒罚时发表了自己的看法，并将其与佩雷斯之前在比赛中的处罚进行了对比。
“这是荒谬的，但或许比赛规则本身有很大的局限性也应该被指责。规则应该被修改，包括赛事干事制度”
“佩雷斯在奥地利两次被罚 5 秒，因为那是轻微的碰撞并且没有造成任何车辆起飞。他们本可以罚汉密尔顿通过维修区停10秒，但他们也没有那样做。”
他通过解释问题的严重性来总结他的话：
“Max在他的赛车线上，汉密尔顿也在那个地方，他必须松开油门。在最快的弯道之一你绝对不能撞到对手的后轮，最轻的触碰都会带来致命的后果。所以，这是一个不负责任的行为。汉密尔顿需要知道后果是什么。”
原文：
Red Bull Hire Lawyer To Investigate Crash
Marko started off by explaining why they hired the lawyer
“He [the lawyer] should check what you could do in such a situation within the framework of the sports law”
He reiterated why he feels Hamilton should have received a race suspension
“We are lucky that nothing serious has happened to Max. The car is broken and the engine probably too. You can't let that sit on you. A suspension would be justified”
He further gave his thoughts on the 10-second penalty that Hamilton received instead and contrasted that with Perez’ penalties from the race before
“That’s ridiculous. But maybe the regulations are also to blame for being relatively restricted. The law should be revised, including the stewards’ system”
“Perez got five seconds twice in Austria because there was marginal contact without anyone flying off. You could have given a drive-through penalty plus ten seconds for Hamilton. But they didn’t do that either”
He summed up his words by explaining how serious the issue is
“Max was on his line, where Hamilton was, he has to lift off the throttle. You cannot hit your opponent on the rear wheel in one of the fastest corners, the lightest touch has fatal consequences. So, an irresponsible action. Hamilton needs to know what the consequences are”
