打球时,这样算不算进攻方犯规或移动挡拆?

11回复/ 0573 浏览
缪斯Muse丶(18级)楼主2017-08-20 22:13:29发布于湖南
打球时,这样算不算进攻方犯规或移动挡拆?缪斯Muse丶 发表在步行街主干道 https://bbs.hupu.com/topic-daily

全部回帖

收起
“挡拆”是多种掩护配合的总称,即队员在相互掩护的过程中创造接球投篮或二次进攻机会的一种配合方法。挡拆其实就是一个很简单的篮球战术,其含义为挡和拆。
所以移动挡拆并不是一个正确的表述,那叫 移动掩护犯规。按你的描述做墙的球员掩护时站立不动哪来的犯规?
“挡拆”是多种掩护配合的总称,即队员在相互掩护的过程中创造接球投篮或二次进攻机会的一种配合方法。挡拆其实就是一个很简单的篮球战术,其含义为挡和拆。
所以移动挡拆并不是一个正确的表述,那叫 移动掩护犯规。按你的描述做墙的球员掩护时站立不动哪来的犯规?
亮了(0)
回复
引用 @intelchen 发表的:
只看此人
“挡拆”是多种掩护配合的总称,即队员在相互掩护的过程中创造接球投篮或二次进攻机会的一种配合方法。挡拆其实就是一个很简单的篮球战术,其含义为挡和拆。 所以移动挡拆并不是一个正确的表述,那叫 移动掩护犯规。按你的描述做墙的球员掩护时站立不动哪来的犯规?
“挡拆”是多种掩护配合的总称,即队员在相互掩护的过程中创造接球投篮或二次进攻机会的一种配合方法。挡拆其实就是一个很简单的篮球战术,其含义为挡和拆。
所以移动挡拆并不是一个正确的表述,那叫 移动掩护犯规。按你的描述做墙的球员掩护时站立不动哪来的犯规?
理论上C是可能犯规的,C不能靠着B太近了,需要给B能绕开的余地。


Illegal screening is when the player who is screening an opponent:


1.Was moving when contact occurred.
2.Did not give sufficient distance in setting a screen outside the field of vision of a stationary opponent when contact occurred.
3. Did not respect the elements of time and distance of an opponent in motion when contact occurred.


If the screen is set within the field of vision of a stationary opponent (front or lateral), the screener may establish the screen as close to him as he desires, provided there is no contact.
If the screen is set outside the field of vision of a stationary opponent, the screener must permit the opponent to take 1 normal step towards the screen without making contact.
If the opponent is in motion, the elements of time and distance shall apply. The screener must leave enough space so that the player who is being screened is able to avoid the screen by stopping or changing direction.
The distance required is never less than 1 and never more than 2 normal steps.
理论上C是可能犯规的,C不能靠着B太近了,需要给B能绕开的余地。


Illegal screening is when the player who is screening an opponent:


1.Was moving when contact occurred.
2.Did not give sufficient distance in setting a screen outside the field of vision of a stationary opponent when contact occurred.
3. Did not respect the elements of time and distance of an opponent in motion when contact occurred.


If the screen is set within the field of vision of a stationary opponent (front or lateral), the screener may establish the screen as close to him as he desires, provided there is no contact.
If the screen is set outside the field of vision of a stationary opponent, the screener must permit the opponent to take 1 normal step towards the screen without making contact.
If the opponent is in motion, the elements of time and distance shall apply. The screener must leave enough space so that the player who is being screened is able to avoid the screen by stopping or changing direction.
The distance required is never less than 1 and never more than 2 normal steps.
亮了(0)
回复
引用 @mondler0418 发表的:
只看此人
理论上C是可能犯规的,C不能靠着B太近了,需要给B能绕开的余地。Illegal screening is when the player who is screening an opponent:1.Was moving when contact occurred.2.Did not give sufficient distance in setting a screen outside the field of vision of a stationary opponent when contact occurred.3. Did not respect the elements of time and distance of an opponent in motion when contact occurred.If the screen is set within the field of vision of a stationary opponent (front or lateral), the screener may establish the screen as close to him as he desires, provided there is no contact.If the screen is set outside the field of vision of a stationary opponent, the screener must permit the opponent to take 1 normal step towards the screen without making contact.If the opponent is in motion, the elements of time and distance shall apply. The screener must leave enough space so that the player who is being screened is able to avoid the screen by stopping or changing direction.The distance required is never less than 1 and never more than 2 normal steps.
理论上C是可能犯规的,C不能靠着B太近了,需要给B能绕开的余地。


Illegal screening is when the player who is screening an opponent:


1.Was moving when contact occurred.
2.Did not give sufficient distance in setting a screen outside the field of vision of a stationary opponent when contact occurred.
3. Did not respect the elements of time and distance of an opponent in motion when contact occurred.


If the screen is set within the field of vision of a stationary opponent (front or lateral), the screener may establish the screen as close to him as he desires, provided there is no contact.
If the screen is set outside the field of vision of a stationary opponent, the screener must permit the opponent to take 1 normal step towards the screen without making contact.
If the opponent is in motion, the elements of time and distance shall apply. The screener must leave enough space so that the player who is being screened is able to avoid the screen by stopping or changing direction.
The distance required is never less than 1 and never more than 2 normal steps.
这个我一直有一个疑问……
按道理来说,不少于一步是完全可以理解的,但是为什么还不能多于两步……
这个我一直有一个疑问……
按道理来说,不少于一步是完全可以理解的,但是为什么还不能多于两步……
亮了(0)
回复
引用 @mondler0418 发表的:
只看此人
理论上C是可能犯规的,C不能靠着B太近了,需要给B能绕开的余地。Illegal screening is when the player who is screening an opponent:1.Was moving when contact occurred.2.Did not give sufficient distance in setting a screen outside the field of vision of a stationary opponent when contact occurred.3. Did not respect the elements of time and distance of an opponent in motion when contact occurred.If the screen is set within the field of vision of a stationary opponent (front or lateral), the screener may establish the screen as close to him as he desires, provided there is no contact.If the screen is set outside the field of vision of a stationary opponent, the screener must permit the opponent to take 1 normal step towards the screen without making contact.If the opponent is in motion, the elements of time and distance shall apply. The screener must leave enough space so that the player who is being screened is able to avoid the screen by stopping or changing direction.The distance required is never less than 1 and never more than 2 normal steps.
理论上C是可能犯规的,C不能靠着B太近了,需要给B能绕开的余地。


Illegal screening is when the player who is screening an opponent:


1.Was moving when contact occurred.
2.Did not give sufficient distance in setting a screen outside the field of vision of a stationary opponent when contact occurred.
3. Did not respect the elements of time and distance of an opponent in motion when contact occurred.


If the screen is set within the field of vision of a stationary opponent (front or lateral), the screener may establish the screen as close to him as he desires, provided there is no contact.
If the screen is set outside the field of vision of a stationary opponent, the screener must permit the opponent to take 1 normal step towards the screen without making contact.
If the opponent is in motion, the elements of time and distance shall apply. The screener must leave enough space so that the player who is being screened is able to avoid the screen by stopping or changing direction.
The distance required is never less than 1 and never more than 2 normal steps.
谁能给翻译一下,,
谁能给翻译一下,,
亮了(0)
回复
引用 @缪斯Muse丶 发表的:
只看此人
谁能给翻译一下,,
谁能给翻译一下,,
掩护:合法的和非法的
掩护是试图延误或阻止一名不持球的对方队员到达他希望到达的场上位置。
当正在掩护对手的队员:
·发生接触时是静止的(在他的圆柱体内)。
·发生接触时双脚着地。
是合法的掩护。
当正在掩护对手的队员:
·发生接触时正在移动。
·在静止对手的视野之外做掩护,发生接触时没有给出足
够的距离。
·发生接触时,对移动中的对手没有顾及时间/距离的因素
是非法的掩护。
如果在静止对手的视野之内做掩护(前面的或侧面的),做掩护的队员可按自己的意愿靠近对手以建立掩护,只要没有接触。
如果在静止对手的视野之外做掩护,做掩护的队员必须允许对手向掩护迈出正常的1步而不发生接触。
如果对手在移动中,时间和距离的因素应适用。做掩护的队员必须留出足够的空间,以便被掩护的队员能通过停步或改变方向来避免掩护。
要求的距离是不得少于正常的1步,也不必多于正常的2步.
与已经建立掩护的队员的任何接触,由被合法掩护的队员负责。
掩护:合法的和非法的
掩护是试图延误或阻止一名不持球的对方队员到达他希望到达的场上位置。
当正在掩护对手的队员:
·发生接触时是静止的(在他的圆柱体内)。
·发生接触时双脚着地。
是合法的掩护。
当正在掩护对手的队员:
·发生接触时正在移动。
·在静止对手的视野之外做掩护,发生接触时没有给出足
够的距离。
·发生接触时,对移动中的对手没有顾及时间/距离的因素
是非法的掩护。
如果在静止对手的视野之内做掩护(前面的或侧面的),做掩护的队员可按自己的意愿靠近对手以建立掩护,只要没有接触。
如果在静止对手的视野之外做掩护,做掩护的队员必须允许对手向掩护迈出正常的1步而不发生接触。
如果对手在移动中,时间和距离的因素应适用。做掩护的队员必须留出足够的空间,以便被掩护的队员能通过停步或改变方向来避免掩护。
要求的距离是不得少于正常的1步,也不必多于正常的2步.
与已经建立掩护的队员的任何接触,由被合法掩护的队员负责。
亮了(0)
回复
另:你主楼的描述完全看不出来是否有掩护犯规。
另:你主楼的描述完全看不出来是否有掩护犯规。
亮了(0)
回复
引用 @二姚 发表的:
只看此人
这个我一直有一个疑问……按道理来说,不少于一步是完全可以理解的,但是为什么还不能多于两步……
这个我一直有一个疑问……
按道理来说,不少于一步是完全可以理解的,但是为什么还不能多于两步……
这里的时间与距离因素是与移动速度相关的,被挡住的队员速度快就要多留点空间,慢就可以少留点。不多于两步应该是说即使再快也不用留多于两步距离。
这里的时间与距离因素是与移动速度相关的,被挡住的队员速度快就要多留点空间,慢就可以少留点。不多于两步应该是说即使再快也不用留多于两步距离。
亮了(0)
回复
所谓移动挡拆或者移动掩护犯规,通俗的理解是做掩护的队员与对方在移动中发生接触,而不是被掩护的队员。所以一般而言(也就是说留够了距离的情况下)你说的C队员站着不动是不会犯规的。
所谓移动挡拆或者移动掩护犯规,通俗的理解是做掩护的队员与对方在移动中发生接触,而不是被掩护的队员。所以一般而言(也就是说留够了距离的情况下)你说的C队员站着不动是不会犯规的。
亮了(0)
回复
引用 @ji_laizhi 发表的:
只看此人
这里的时间与距离因素是与移动速度相关的,被挡住的队员速度快就要多留点空间,慢就可以少留点。不多于两步应该是说即使再快也不用留多于两步距离。
这里的时间与距离因素是与移动速度相关的,被挡住的队员速度快就要多留点空间,慢就可以少留点。不多于两步应该是说即使再快也不用留多于两步距离。
我还以为不多于两步和不少于一步一样,都是比较硬性的规定……
我还以为不多于两步和不少于一步一样,都是比较硬性的规定……
亮了(0)
回复
引用 @intelchen 发表的:
只看此人
“挡拆”是多种掩护配合的总称,即队员在相互掩护的过程中创造接球投篮或二次进攻机会的一种配合方法。挡拆其实就是一个很简单的篮球战术,其含义为挡和拆。 所以移动挡拆并不是一个正确的表述,那叫 移动掩护犯规。按你的描述做墙的球员掩护时站立不动哪来的犯规?
“挡拆”是多种掩护配合的总称,即队员在相互掩护的过程中创造接球投篮或二次进攻机会的一种配合方法。挡拆其实就是一个很简单的篮球战术,其含义为挡和拆。
所以移动挡拆并不是一个正确的表述,那叫 移动掩护犯规。按你的描述做墙的球员掩护时站立不动哪来的犯规?
防守无球和建立掩护的距离要求都是规则原文。

切入快速移动的对手的视野之外建立掩护,并且没有留出足够的距离,即便在接触瞬间掩护球员站立不动,仍然构成犯规。某种场合下甚至是一个危险的犯规。
防守无球和建立掩护的距离要求都是规则原文。

切入快速移动的对手的视野之外建立掩护,并且没有留出足够的距离,即便在接触瞬间掩护球员站立不动,仍然构成犯规。某种场合下甚至是一个危险的犯规。
亮了(0)
回复
引用 @二姚 发表的:
只看此人
我还以为不多于两步和不少于一步一样,都是比较硬性的规定……
我还以为不多于两步和不少于一步一样,都是比较硬性的规定……
的确语焉不详,我的理解不多于两步的意思是隔那么远都已经不用考虑这个限定了……
的确语焉不详,我的理解不多于两步的意思是隔那么远都已经不用考虑这个限定了……
亮了(0)
回复
Re:打球时,这样算不算进攻方犯规或移动挡拆?
虎扑游戏中心
步行街主干道最热帖
还有三天!传递主队之魂!参与CBA主队打分,赢取专属球迷大奖!
郭雨妍这波什么水平
普通人不想上班,出路在哪里?
张元英再现神级转圈,啥时候中国娱乐圈能出个这种火遍全球的明星?
又有中国人在TikTok反思了
喜欢上了自己的领导,该怎么处理爱而不得的人生
上海豪宅卖疯了
给你一百亿美元,选一年不许做三件事。
日本女权学家上野千鹤子:中国女性不应该要彩礼,因为这不是女性主义,而是物质主义
感觉自己有点小肚鸡肠
步行街主干道最新帖
突然想,都是普普通通的人为什么会把一个没真正了解过的人认为多么高尚的,其实都是会被私欲所左右的普通人
半夜睡不着,请问有没有医生大哥帮忙看看
有些父亲不配为人父,也难怪有些女的厌父
梦开始的地方
小破站搞的这个世界读书日特供活动,确实是让我开了眼……
戒色
一段温柔的视频,喜欢吗?
兄弟们,物华弥新哪些角色是t0啊?
穆雷压哨绝杀后浓眉被围在一起庆祝是什么水平?
UFC各量级Goat
热门游戏-即点即玩
无需下载,足球经理模式一键即玩
《NBA英雄》教练系统上线啦!我选好了,看看你的