全部回帖
收起
[quote][b]引用139楼 @yamitsu 发表的[/b]:
"Ilori’s exit provides the latest example of Liverpool’s flawed transfer strategy during Rodgers’ reign prior to this summer. Out of the 24 players they brought in from 2012 to 2014, 13 of them have now either left the club or been sent out on loan.
Many of those who have been shown the door were players like Ilori who were lauded by the transfer committee rather than being deals that Rodgers was the driving force behind.
Out of the eight players who arrived at the club last summer, four have already gone with three of them – Mario Balotelli, Javier Manquillo and Lazar Markovic – viewed as committee picks.
Of course Rodgers isn’t in the business of cutting off his nose to spite his face. If he thought they were up to the task he would have kept them and played them. The bottom line is they, like Ilori, didn’t impress him, but it underlines the folly of signing players the manager isn’t 100% sold on. - Meaning they will never get a chance so why buy them in the first place?
This summer saw a change of approach from the owners who backed Rodgers’ judgement and gave him what he wanted as targets were secured early on in the window with a minimum of fuss. "
The above is an exerpt from a James Pearce article and for me sums up the issue the club has been facing the last 3 seasons and is the underlying reason for the state of the squad. Having a manager who is fighting internally as well as against other clubs will never work.
I think it is obvious Brendan is playing the 'Politics Game' and that Pearce is VERY wrong in the bold sentence above. IMO that is EXACTLY what Rodgers is doing with his management of the players brought in by the TC and why he should step aside.
Only a manager who has proved his system works should have the 'free reign' BR requires. Thus far Rodgers has failed to demonstrate he knows what his best players are or the best system to use them in for 3 seasons now and enough is enough.
With Top 4 qualification more difficult than ever and the stumbling of Man UTD currently means we simply HAVE to capitalise or we find ourselves with an even bigger mountain to climb. We failed last season, this season it should be our only priority yet here we war having to listen to BR impress that a cup and top 4 are targets. Well forget the cups Brendan they only serve to decorate cabinets and flatter ego's, they offer little to the coffers tin. They are 'Trophy' trophies and are a long way down the list below the 'bread and butter' of the PL and CL.
The biggest mistake last year was diluting the squad with 'potential' when cementing a top 4 spot was paramount. Yet here we heard BR again saying that he wanted a squad "capable of competing on all fronts". Why? He got ahead of himself and thought even without Luis the squad was capable of competing in four competitions.
Again, IMO only teams such as Chelsea and City have squads capable of being stretched to four competitions in a season. For BR to even think he had a chance was amateur, totally amateur. If he didn't agree with the signings brought in how did he think he was going to turn them into a squad capable of doing the job?
He has got himself involved in the romance and history of the club way too much and it is affecting him just like his decision to play Chelsea for a win instead of the result he needed which was a draw. Again amateur.
I could go on about his tactics and his substitutions but I think the general opinion is the same for everybody now, even his stanchest supporters of which I was one but no more.
Without dissecting his last three seasons to the eights degree which really isn't necessary to form an opinion I really do think now is the time for BR to hold his hands up and say goodbye. His job is only going to get tougher from now on now he has lost the trust of the fans.
Thoughts?[/quote]
罗杰斯卖人太有针对性了，他的球队缺乏公平可言
"Ilori’s exit provides the latest example of Liverpool’s flawed transfer strategy during Rodgers’ reign prior to this summer. Out of the 24 players they brought in from 2012 to 2014, 13 of them have now either left the club or been sent out on loan.
Many of those who have been shown the door were players like Ilori who were lauded by the transfer committee rather than being deals that Rodgers was the driving force behind.
Out of the eight players who arrived at the club last summer, four have already gone with three of them – Mario Balotelli, Javier Manquillo and Lazar Markovic – viewed as committee picks.
Of course Rodgers isn’t in the business of cutting off his nose to spite his face. If he thought they were up to the task he would have kept them and played them. The bottom line is they, like Ilori, didn’t impress him, but it underlines the folly of signing players the manager isn’t 100% sold on. - Meaning they will never get a chance so why buy them in the first place?
This summer saw a change of approach from the owners who backed Rodgers’ judgement and gave him what he wanted as targets were secured early on in the window with a minimum of fuss. "
The above is an exerpt from a James Pearce article and for me sums up the issue the club has been facing the last 3 seasons and is the underlying reason for the state of the squad. Having a manager who is fighting internally as well as against other clubs will never work.
I think it is obvious Brendan is playing the 'Politics Game' and that Pearce is VERY wrong in the bold sentence above. IMO that is EXACTLY what Rodgers is doing with his management of the players brought in by the TC and why he should step aside.
Only a manager who has proved his system works should have the 'free reign' BR requires. Thus far Rodgers has failed to demonstrate he knows what his best players are or the best system to use them in for 3 seasons now and enough is enough.
With Top 4 qualification more difficult than ever and the stumbling of Man UTD currently means we simply HAVE to capitalise or we find ourselves with an even bigger mountain to climb. We failed last season, this season it should be our only priority yet here we war having to listen to BR impress that a cup and top 4 are targets. Well forget the cups Brendan they only serve to decorate cabinets and flatter ego's, they offer little to the coffers tin. They are 'Trophy' trophies and are a long way down the list below the 'bread and butter' of the PL and CL.
The biggest mistake last year was diluting the squad with 'potential' when cementing a top 4 spot was paramount. Yet here we heard BR again saying that he wanted a squad "capable of competing on all fronts". Why? He got ahead of himself and thought even without Luis the squad was capable of competing in four competitions.
Again, IMO only teams such as Chelsea and City have squads capable of being stretched to four competitions in a season. For BR to even think he had a chance was amateur, totally amateur. If he didn't agree with the signings brought in how did he think he was going to turn them into a squad capable of doing the job?
He has got himself involved in the romance and history of the club way too much and it is affecting him just like his decision to play Chelsea for a win instead of the result he needed which was a draw. Again amateur.
I could go on about his tactics and his substitutions but I think the general opinion is the same for everybody now, even his stanchest supporters of which I was one but no more.
Without dissecting his last three seasons to the eights degree which really isn't necessary to form an opinion I really do think now is the time for BR to hold his hands up and say goodbye. His job is only going to get tougher from now on now he has lost the trust of the fans.
Thoughts?[/quote]
罗杰斯卖人太有针对性了，他的球队缺乏公平可言
[quote][b]引用139楼 @yamitsu 发表的[/b]:
"Ilori’s exit provides the latest example of Liverpool’s flawed transfer strategy during Rodgers’ reign prior to this summer. Out of the 24 players they brought in from 2012 to 2014, 13 of them have now either left the club or been sent out on loan.
Many of those who have been shown the door were players like Ilori who were lauded by the transfer committee rather than being deals that Rodgers was the driving force behind.
Out of the eight players who arrived at the club last summer, four have already gone with three of them – Mario Balotelli, Javier Manquillo and Lazar Markovic – viewed as committee picks.
Of course Rodgers isn’t in the business of cutting off his nose to spite his face. If he thought they were up to the task he would have kept them and played them. The bottom line is they, like Ilori, didn’t impress him, but it underlines the folly of signing players the manager isn’t 100% sold on. - Meaning they will never get a chance so why buy them in the first place?
This summer saw a change of approach from the owners who backed Rodgers’ judgement and gave him what he wanted as targets were secured early on in the window with a minimum of fuss. "
The above is an exerpt from a James Pearce article and for me sums up the issue the club has been facing the last 3 seasons and is the underlying reason for the state of the squad. Having a manager who is fighting internally as well as against other clubs will never work.
I think it is obvious Brendan is playing the 'Politics Game' and that Pearce is VERY wrong in the bold sentence above. IMO that is EXACTLY what Rodgers is doing with his management of the players brought in by the TC and why he should step aside.
Only a manager who has proved his system works should have the 'free reign' BR requires. Thus far Rodgers has failed to demonstrate he knows what his best players are or the best system to use them in for 3 seasons now and enough is enough.
With Top 4 qualification more difficult than ever and the stumbling of Man UTD currently means we simply HAVE to capitalise or we find ourselves with an even bigger mountain to climb. We failed last season, this season it should be our only priority yet here we war having to listen to BR impress that a cup and top 4 are targets. Well forget the cups Brendan they only serve to decorate cabinets and flatter ego's, they offer little to the coffers tin. They are 'Trophy' trophies and are a long way down the list below the 'bread and butter' of the PL and CL.
The biggest mistake last year was diluting the squad with 'potential' when cementing a top 4 spot was paramount. Yet here we heard BR again saying that he wanted a squad "capable of competing on all fronts". Why? He got ahead of himself and thought even without Luis the squad was capable of competing in four competitions.
Again, IMO only teams such as Chelsea and City have squads capable of being stretched to four competitions in a season. For BR to even think he had a chance was amateur, totally amateur. If he didn't agree with the signings brought in how did he think he was going to turn them into a squad capable of doing the job?
He has got himself involved in the romance and history of the club way too much and it is affecting him just like his decision to play Chelsea for a win instead of the result he needed which was a draw. Again amateur.
I could go on about his tactics and his substitutions but I think the general opinion is the same for everybody now, even his stanchest supporters of which I was one but no more.
Without dissecting his last three seasons to the eights degree which really isn't necessary to form an opinion I really do think now is the time for BR to hold his hands up and say goodbye. His job is only going to get tougher from now on now he has lost the trust of the fans.
Thoughts?[/quote]
罗杰斯卖人太有针对性了，他的球队缺乏公平可言
"Ilori’s exit provides the latest example of Liverpool’s flawed transfer strategy during Rodgers’ reign prior to this summer. Out of the 24 players they brought in from 2012 to 2014, 13 of them have now either left the club or been sent out on loan.
Many of those who have been shown the door were players like Ilori who were lauded by the transfer committee rather than being deals that Rodgers was the driving force behind.
Out of the eight players who arrived at the club last summer, four have already gone with three of them – Mario Balotelli, Javier Manquillo and Lazar Markovic – viewed as committee picks.
Of course Rodgers isn’t in the business of cutting off his nose to spite his face. If he thought they were up to the task he would have kept them and played them. The bottom line is they, like Ilori, didn’t impress him, but it underlines the folly of signing players the manager isn’t 100% sold on. - Meaning they will never get a chance so why buy them in the first place?
This summer saw a change of approach from the owners who backed Rodgers’ judgement and gave him what he wanted as targets were secured early on in the window with a minimum of fuss. "
The above is an exerpt from a James Pearce article and for me sums up the issue the club has been facing the last 3 seasons and is the underlying reason for the state of the squad. Having a manager who is fighting internally as well as against other clubs will never work.
I think it is obvious Brendan is playing the 'Politics Game' and that Pearce is VERY wrong in the bold sentence above. IMO that is EXACTLY what Rodgers is doing with his management of the players brought in by the TC and why he should step aside.
Only a manager who has proved his system works should have the 'free reign' BR requires. Thus far Rodgers has failed to demonstrate he knows what his best players are or the best system to use them in for 3 seasons now and enough is enough.
With Top 4 qualification more difficult than ever and the stumbling of Man UTD currently means we simply HAVE to capitalise or we find ourselves with an even bigger mountain to climb. We failed last season, this season it should be our only priority yet here we war having to listen to BR impress that a cup and top 4 are targets. Well forget the cups Brendan they only serve to decorate cabinets and flatter ego's, they offer little to the coffers tin. They are 'Trophy' trophies and are a long way down the list below the 'bread and butter' of the PL and CL.
The biggest mistake last year was diluting the squad with 'potential' when cementing a top 4 spot was paramount. Yet here we heard BR again saying that he wanted a squad "capable of competing on all fronts". Why? He got ahead of himself and thought even without Luis the squad was capable of competing in four competitions.
Again, IMO only teams such as Chelsea and City have squads capable of being stretched to four competitions in a season. For BR to even think he had a chance was amateur, totally amateur. If he didn't agree with the signings brought in how did he think he was going to turn them into a squad capable of doing the job?
He has got himself involved in the romance and history of the club way too much and it is affecting him just like his decision to play Chelsea for a win instead of the result he needed which was a draw. Again amateur.
I could go on about his tactics and his substitutions but I think the general opinion is the same for everybody now, even his stanchest supporters of which I was one but no more.
Without dissecting his last three seasons to the eights degree which really isn't necessary to form an opinion I really do think now is the time for BR to hold his hands up and say goodbye. His job is only going to get tougher from now on now he has lost the trust of the fans.
Thoughts?[/quote]
罗杰斯卖人太有针对性了，他的球队缺乏公平可言
亮了(0)
回复
[quote][b]引用143楼 @liverpool64 发表的[/b]:
<BR>人蜜也需要客观对待事实存在的问题吧[/quote]
就利物浦目前的人员来说，每个球员赛后都可以找出一些黑点。
但偏偏你的赛后几乎每次都点名批评卢卡斯，我不是卢卡斯人蜜，他也是俱乐部的老臣，我只是有点看不下去。
其实在中圈弧往本方禁区回追这事儿黑卢卡斯我觉得他有些冤枉，经常看到他不遗余力的回追，而不是散步，对方进攻推进的稍慢一点，他可能就能回到本方大禁区前。
你贴的动图那次，首先，他即使回追，也是追不上对方的，可以以远端回追的克莱因 为参照看一下，因为对方持球队员确实速度快。其次，不仅仅是卢卡斯，米尔纳也采取了中场干扰对方持球队员的策略，失败后和卢卡斯一样拼命回追；结合平时比赛罗杰斯的战术，可见这次应该是罗杰斯的战术安排，尽量第一时间干扰对方出球，延缓对方的反击，能抢下来最好。（应该说这样的安排有轻视对手的嫌疑）
<BR>人蜜也需要客观对待事实存在的问题吧[/quote]
就利物浦目前的人员来说，每个球员赛后都可以找出一些黑点。
但偏偏你的赛后几乎每次都点名批评卢卡斯，我不是卢卡斯人蜜，他也是俱乐部的老臣，我只是有点看不下去。
其实在中圈弧往本方禁区回追这事儿黑卢卡斯我觉得他有些冤枉，经常看到他不遗余力的回追，而不是散步，对方进攻推进的稍慢一点，他可能就能回到本方大禁区前。
你贴的动图那次，首先，他即使回追，也是追不上对方的，可以以远端回追的克莱因 为参照看一下，因为对方持球队员确实速度快。其次，不仅仅是卢卡斯，米尔纳也采取了中场干扰对方持球队员的策略，失败后和卢卡斯一样拼命回追；结合平时比赛罗杰斯的战术，可见这次应该是罗杰斯的战术安排，尽量第一时间干扰对方出球，延缓对方的反击，能抢下来最好。（应该说这样的安排有轻视对手的嫌疑）
[quote][b]引用143楼 @liverpool64 发表的[/b]:
<BR>人蜜也需要客观对待事实存在的问题吧[/quote]
就利物浦目前的人员来说，每个球员赛后都可以找出一些黑点。
但偏偏你的赛后几乎每次都点名批评卢卡斯，我不是卢卡斯人蜜，他也是俱乐部的老臣，我只是有点看不下去。
其实在中圈弧往本方禁区回追这事儿黑卢卡斯我觉得他有些冤枉，经常看到他不遗余力的回追，而不是散步，对方进攻推进的稍慢一点，他可能就能回到本方大禁区前。
你贴的动图那次，首先，他即使回追，也是追不上对方的，可以以远端回追的克莱因 为参照看一下，因为对方持球队员确实速度快。其次，不仅仅是卢卡斯，米尔纳也采取了中场干扰对方持球队员的策略，失败后和卢卡斯一样拼命回追；结合平时比赛罗杰斯的战术，可见这次应该是罗杰斯的战术安排，尽量第一时间干扰对方出球，延缓对方的反击，能抢下来最好。（应该说这样的安排有轻视对手的嫌疑）
<BR>人蜜也需要客观对待事实存在的问题吧[/quote]
就利物浦目前的人员来说，每个球员赛后都可以找出一些黑点。
但偏偏你的赛后几乎每次都点名批评卢卡斯，我不是卢卡斯人蜜，他也是俱乐部的老臣，我只是有点看不下去。
其实在中圈弧往本方禁区回追这事儿黑卢卡斯我觉得他有些冤枉，经常看到他不遗余力的回追，而不是散步，对方进攻推进的稍慢一点，他可能就能回到本方大禁区前。
你贴的动图那次，首先，他即使回追，也是追不上对方的，可以以远端回追的克莱因 为参照看一下，因为对方持球队员确实速度快。其次，不仅仅是卢卡斯，米尔纳也采取了中场干扰对方持球队员的策略，失败后和卢卡斯一样拼命回追；结合平时比赛罗杰斯的战术，可见这次应该是罗杰斯的战术安排，尽量第一时间干扰对方出球，延缓对方的反击，能抢下来最好。（应该说这样的安排有轻视对手的嫌疑）
亮了(4)
回复
[quote][b]引用148楼 @北长街 发表的[/b]:
<span style="line-height: 1.6;">这次退场说明他们对本场比赛不满到一定程度了</span><div><span style="line-height: 1.6;">跟他们下一场来不来没任何关系</span>
<span style="line-height: 1.6;">如果以Kop看台不再有人来为衡量标准</span>
<span style="line-height: 1.6;">把罗杰斯换成沈祥福也没问题</span>
</div>[/quote]
球迷支持的是利物浦，不是罗杰斯。
你说这场你不想看了，下一场你能忍住不看吗？
至于说主教练了是谁，这毕竟不是球迷能决定的，静观其变吧。
达格利什的时候，球迷也没少退场。
<span style="line-height: 1.6;">这次退场说明他们对本场比赛不满到一定程度了</span><div><span style="line-height: 1.6;">跟他们下一场来不来没任何关系</span>
<span style="line-height: 1.6;">如果以Kop看台不再有人来为衡量标准</span>
<span style="line-height: 1.6;">把罗杰斯换成沈祥福也没问题</span>
</div>[/quote]
球迷支持的是利物浦，不是罗杰斯。
你说这场你不想看了，下一场你能忍住不看吗？
至于说主教练了是谁，这毕竟不是球迷能决定的，静观其变吧。
达格利什的时候，球迷也没少退场。
[quote][b]引用148楼 @北长街 发表的[/b]:
<span style="line-height: 1.6;">这次退场说明他们对本场比赛不满到一定程度了</span><div><span style="line-height: 1.6;">跟他们下一场来不来没任何关系</span>
<span style="line-height: 1.6;">如果以Kop看台不再有人来为衡量标准</span>
<span style="line-height: 1.6;">把罗杰斯换成沈祥福也没问题</span>
</div>[/quote]
球迷支持的是利物浦，不是罗杰斯。
你说这场你不想看了，下一场你能忍住不看吗？
至于说主教练了是谁，这毕竟不是球迷能决定的，静观其变吧。
达格利什的时候，球迷也没少退场。
<span style="line-height: 1.6;">这次退场说明他们对本场比赛不满到一定程度了</span><div><span style="line-height: 1.6;">跟他们下一场来不来没任何关系</span>
<span style="line-height: 1.6;">如果以Kop看台不再有人来为衡量标准</span>
<span style="line-height: 1.6;">把罗杰斯换成沈祥福也没问题</span>
</div>[/quote]
球迷支持的是利物浦，不是罗杰斯。
你说这场你不想看了，下一场你能忍住不看吗？
至于说主教练了是谁，这毕竟不是球迷能决定的，静观其变吧。
达格利什的时候，球迷也没少退场。
亮了(0)
回复
[quote][b]引用147楼 @战斗吧红军 发表的[/b]:
就利物浦目前的人员来说，每个球员赛后都可以找出一些黑点。
但偏偏你的赛后几乎每次都点名批评卢卡斯，我不是卢卡斯人蜜，他也是俱乐部的老臣，我只是有点看不下去。
其实在中圈弧往本方禁区回追这事儿黑卢卡斯我觉得他有些冤枉，经常看到他不遗余力的回追，而不是散步，对方进攻推进的稍慢一点，他可能就能回到本方大禁区前。
你贴的动图那次，首先，他即使回追，也是追不上对方的，可以以远端回追的克莱因 为参照看一下，因为对方持球队员确实速度快。其次，不仅仅是卢卡斯，米尔纳也采取了中场干扰对方持球队员的策略，失败后和卢卡斯一样拼命回追；结合平时比赛罗杰斯的战术，可见这次应该是罗杰斯的战术安排，尽量第一时间干扰对方出球，延缓对方的反击，能抢下来最好。（应该说这样的安排有轻视对手的嫌疑）[/quote]
其他人踢后腰也有比较莫名的失位上抢，但是回追速度比卢卡斯快多了。
最后一名中场拖后防守人，基本原则是保持队形距离，你如果要求为了配合卢卡斯到对手中圈上抢，要求整条后卫线过中线压迫，那我无话可说。
就利物浦目前的人员来说，每个球员赛后都可以找出一些黑点。
但偏偏你的赛后几乎每次都点名批评卢卡斯，我不是卢卡斯人蜜，他也是俱乐部的老臣，我只是有点看不下去。
其实在中圈弧往本方禁区回追这事儿黑卢卡斯我觉得他有些冤枉，经常看到他不遗余力的回追，而不是散步，对方进攻推进的稍慢一点，他可能就能回到本方大禁区前。
你贴的动图那次，首先，他即使回追，也是追不上对方的，可以以远端回追的克莱因 为参照看一下，因为对方持球队员确实速度快。其次，不仅仅是卢卡斯，米尔纳也采取了中场干扰对方持球队员的策略，失败后和卢卡斯一样拼命回追；结合平时比赛罗杰斯的战术，可见这次应该是罗杰斯的战术安排，尽量第一时间干扰对方出球，延缓对方的反击，能抢下来最好。（应该说这样的安排有轻视对手的嫌疑）[/quote]
其他人踢后腰也有比较莫名的失位上抢，但是回追速度比卢卡斯快多了。
最后一名中场拖后防守人，基本原则是保持队形距离，你如果要求为了配合卢卡斯到对手中圈上抢，要求整条后卫线过中线压迫，那我无话可说。
[quote][b]引用147楼 @战斗吧红军 发表的[/b]:
就利物浦目前的人员来说，每个球员赛后都可以找出一些黑点。
但偏偏你的赛后几乎每次都点名批评卢卡斯，我不是卢卡斯人蜜，他也是俱乐部的老臣，我只是有点看不下去。
其实在中圈弧往本方禁区回追这事儿黑卢卡斯我觉得他有些冤枉，经常看到他不遗余力的回追，而不是散步，对方进攻推进的稍慢一点，他可能就能回到本方大禁区前。
你贴的动图那次，首先，他即使回追，也是追不上对方的，可以以远端回追的克莱因 为参照看一下，因为对方持球队员确实速度快。其次，不仅仅是卢卡斯，米尔纳也采取了中场干扰对方持球队员的策略，失败后和卢卡斯一样拼命回追；结合平时比赛罗杰斯的战术，可见这次应该是罗杰斯的战术安排，尽量第一时间干扰对方出球，延缓对方的反击，能抢下来最好。（应该说这样的安排有轻视对手的嫌疑）[/quote]
其他人踢后腰也有比较莫名的失位上抢，但是回追速度比卢卡斯快多了。
最后一名中场拖后防守人，基本原则是保持队形距离，你如果要求为了配合卢卡斯到对手中圈上抢，要求整条后卫线过中线压迫，那我无话可说。
就利物浦目前的人员来说，每个球员赛后都可以找出一些黑点。
但偏偏你的赛后几乎每次都点名批评卢卡斯，我不是卢卡斯人蜜，他也是俱乐部的老臣，我只是有点看不下去。
其实在中圈弧往本方禁区回追这事儿黑卢卡斯我觉得他有些冤枉，经常看到他不遗余力的回追，而不是散步，对方进攻推进的稍慢一点，他可能就能回到本方大禁区前。
你贴的动图那次，首先，他即使回追，也是追不上对方的，可以以远端回追的克莱因 为参照看一下，因为对方持球队员确实速度快。其次，不仅仅是卢卡斯，米尔纳也采取了中场干扰对方持球队员的策略，失败后和卢卡斯一样拼命回追；结合平时比赛罗杰斯的战术，可见这次应该是罗杰斯的战术安排，尽量第一时间干扰对方出球，延缓对方的反击，能抢下来最好。（应该说这样的安排有轻视对手的嫌疑）[/quote]
其他人踢后腰也有比较莫名的失位上抢，但是回追速度比卢卡斯快多了。
最后一名中场拖后防守人，基本原则是保持队形距离，你如果要求为了配合卢卡斯到对手中圈上抢，要求整条后卫线过中线压迫，那我无话可说。
亮了(1)
回复
[[quote][b]引用135楼 @newera 发表的[/b]:
有阴谋论说芬威博彩起家，用罗屌丝是因为年轻听话会按盘口指示踢球，我不希望这是事实，倘如此暗无天日将永无止境[/quote]
這個好難講，我看利物浦25年球了，也有點這樣的困惑。再看看吧，真如此，我軍就慘了，這幾年有些比賽真的看不懂呀。
有阴谋论说芬威博彩起家，用罗屌丝是因为年轻听话会按盘口指示踢球，我不希望这是事实，倘如此暗无天日将永无止境[/quote]
這個好難講，我看利物浦25年球了，也有點這樣的困惑。再看看吧，真如此，我軍就慘了，這幾年有些比賽真的看不懂呀。
[[quote][b]引用135楼 @newera 发表的[/b]:
有阴谋论说芬威博彩起家，用罗屌丝是因为年轻听话会按盘口指示踢球，我不希望这是事实，倘如此暗无天日将永无止境[/quote]
這個好難講，我看利物浦25年球了，也有點這樣的困惑。再看看吧，真如此，我軍就慘了，這幾年有些比賽真的看不懂呀。
有阴谋论说芬威博彩起家，用罗屌丝是因为年轻听话会按盘口指示踢球，我不希望这是事实，倘如此暗无天日将永无止境[/quote]
這個好難講，我看利物浦25年球了，也有點這樣的困惑。再看看吧，真如此，我軍就慘了，這幾年有些比賽真的看不懂呀。
亮了(0)
回复
[quote][b]引用132楼 @liverpool64 发表的[/b]:
<br> 库鸟在司徒身后是最好的，但是谁来拿第一点呢？[/quote]
我觉得哭鸟就不该上场，因为他一上场，利物浦的前场三人组就只剩下一个人防守，司徒和本泰克不能一块上场。前场三人组的搭配可以有菲儿+因斯+本泰克（或者司徒、奥里吉），菲儿+本泰克+奥里吉，下下选择是库蒂尼奥+奥里吉+因斯。利物浦应该冬季召回马尔科维奇代替库蒂尼奥。
<br> 库鸟在司徒身后是最好的，但是谁来拿第一点呢？[/quote]
我觉得哭鸟就不该上场，因为他一上场，利物浦的前场三人组就只剩下一个人防守，司徒和本泰克不能一块上场。前场三人组的搭配可以有菲儿+因斯+本泰克（或者司徒、奥里吉），菲儿+本泰克+奥里吉，下下选择是库蒂尼奥+奥里吉+因斯。利物浦应该冬季召回马尔科维奇代替库蒂尼奥。
[quote][b]引用132楼 @liverpool64 发表的[/b]:
<br> 库鸟在司徒身后是最好的，但是谁来拿第一点呢？[/quote]
我觉得哭鸟就不该上场，因为他一上场，利物浦的前场三人组就只剩下一个人防守，司徒和本泰克不能一块上场。前场三人组的搭配可以有菲儿+因斯+本泰克（或者司徒、奥里吉），菲儿+本泰克+奥里吉，下下选择是库蒂尼奥+奥里吉+因斯。利物浦应该冬季召回马尔科维奇代替库蒂尼奥。
<br> 库鸟在司徒身后是最好的，但是谁来拿第一点呢？[/quote]
我觉得哭鸟就不该上场，因为他一上场，利物浦的前场三人组就只剩下一个人防守，司徒和本泰克不能一块上场。前场三人组的搭配可以有菲儿+因斯+本泰克（或者司徒、奥里吉），菲儿+本泰克+奥里吉，下下选择是库蒂尼奥+奥里吉+因斯。利物浦应该冬季召回马尔科维奇代替库蒂尼奥。
亮了(0)
回复
[quote][b]引用153楼 @ylp003128 发表的[/b]:
我觉得哭鸟就不该上场，因为他一上场，利物浦的前场三人组就只剩下一个人防守，司徒和本泰克不能一块上场。前场三人组的搭配可以有菲儿+因斯+本泰克（或者司徒、奥里吉），菲儿+本泰克+奥里吉，下下选择是库蒂尼奥+奥里吉+因斯。利物浦应该冬季召回马尔科维奇代替库蒂尼奥。[/quote]
罗杰斯做教练的话，还是应该用库鸟，这符合他的战术思路。
我觉得哭鸟就不该上场，因为他一上场，利物浦的前场三人组就只剩下一个人防守，司徒和本泰克不能一块上场。前场三人组的搭配可以有菲儿+因斯+本泰克（或者司徒、奥里吉），菲儿+本泰克+奥里吉，下下选择是库蒂尼奥+奥里吉+因斯。利物浦应该冬季召回马尔科维奇代替库蒂尼奥。[/quote]
罗杰斯做教练的话，还是应该用库鸟，这符合他的战术思路。
[quote][b]引用153楼 @ylp003128 发表的[/b]:
我觉得哭鸟就不该上场，因为他一上场，利物浦的前场三人组就只剩下一个人防守，司徒和本泰克不能一块上场。前场三人组的搭配可以有菲儿+因斯+本泰克（或者司徒、奥里吉），菲儿+本泰克+奥里吉，下下选择是库蒂尼奥+奥里吉+因斯。利物浦应该冬季召回马尔科维奇代替库蒂尼奥。[/quote]
罗杰斯做教练的话，还是应该用库鸟，这符合他的战术思路。
我觉得哭鸟就不该上场，因为他一上场，利物浦的前场三人组就只剩下一个人防守，司徒和本泰克不能一块上场。前场三人组的搭配可以有菲儿+因斯+本泰克（或者司徒、奥里吉），菲儿+本泰克+奥里吉，下下选择是库蒂尼奥+奥里吉+因斯。利物浦应该冬季召回马尔科维奇代替库蒂尼奥。[/quote]
罗杰斯做教练的话，还是应该用库鸟，这符合他的战术思路。
亮了(0)
回复
别再黑卢卡斯了，我觉得更应该说罗杰斯，64为何那么针对卢卡斯，特点不是一朝一夕了，后腰那么重要为什么不买即战力，前场被断球反击很容易就能穿越压上的后腰，中后场空间大为什么不压缩防区，说白了就是前场进攻战术能力差，导致后卫不敢提上，前场配合乱七八糟才会被反击
别再黑卢卡斯了，我觉得更应该说罗杰斯，64为何那么针对卢卡斯，特点不是一朝一夕了，后腰那么重要为什么不买即战力，前场被断球反击很容易就能穿越压上的后腰，中后场空间大为什么不压缩防区，说白了就是前场进攻战术能力差，导致后卫不敢提上，前场配合乱七八糟才会被反击
亮了(2)
回复
64确实对球员偏见有点深，爱时可以容纳一切缺点，如对马儿；不喜欢的也总掩饰不住。其实那个失球，整个中场都在上压，按战术后卫线也该前提，保持三条线的距离，但明显后卫线和中场脱节，留下来巨大空间。卢卡斯固然回追速度不行，但两个中后卫的应对也很业余，本来该一个后退保护，一个上前紧贴持球人员，但两人都是一直后退，给对手从容起脚打门的机会。
64确实对球员偏见有点深，爱时可以容纳一切缺点，如对马儿；不喜欢的也总掩饰不住。其实那个失球，整个中场都在上压，按战术后卫线也该前提，保持三条线的距离，但明显后卫线和中场脱节，留下来巨大空间。卢卡斯固然回追速度不行，但两个中后卫的应对也很业余，本来该一个后退保护，一个上前紧贴持球人员，但两人都是一直后退，给对手从容起脚打门的机会。
亮了(3)
回复
Re：[爱无止境]第十一期：夏季转会窗口总结
虎扑游戏中心
利物浦专区最热帖
德甲有球队已经就埃利奥特与利物浦进行了接触，并表示对埃利奥特很感兴趣
0亮 3回复
埃利奥特转会传闻是意料之中
0亮 0回复
最近球队的状态极差
10亮 21回复
绯闻 德乙纽伦堡 19岁希腊前锋 齐马斯 集锦
0亮 1回复
KOPS社团 | 赫拉芬贝赫疲态初显，斯洛特应给予他更多休息时间？
4亮 16回复
DO：那不勒斯如果冬窗出售 克瓦拉茨赫利亚 利物浦可能考虑签下他
0亮 1回复
阿诺德下一站拜仁？
4亮 6回复
英媒高度评价远藤航在中后卫和中场两个位置的出色发挥
7亮 14回复
巅峰的何塞恩里克 在利物浦左后卫的位置上 能排第几名呢？
2亮 8回复
记者：萨拉赫希望续约至2028年，高层想签短合同&担心他表现下滑
9亮 16回复
利物浦专区最新帖
埃利奥特转会传闻是意料之中
10分钟前
天胡九莲宝灯
DO：那不勒斯如果冬窗出售 克瓦拉茨赫利亚 利物浦可能考虑签下他
1小时前
v西门吹雪
前利物浦和纽卡斯尔门将卡里乌斯将于明天接受沙尔克04的体检
2小时前
球盲进化中
德甲有球队已经就埃利奥特与利物浦进行了接触，并表示对埃利奥特很感兴趣
2小时前
球盲进化中
早说过阿劳霍合同年就4500左右
2小时前
司礼监都督中外诸军事
绯闻 德乙纽伦堡 19岁希腊前锋 齐马斯 集锦
4小时前
v西门吹雪
巅峰的何塞恩里克 在利物浦左后卫的位置上 能排第几名呢？
4小时前
AGGER22
红军球员的基本素质-骨气和亮剑精神
5小时前
报导上有偏差你们要负责任
阿诺德下一站拜仁？
5小时前
六郎说英超
[流言板]利物浦天气恶劣导致球队航班改降伯明翰，影响球员回家休息
6小时前
虎扑足球资讯
上海匡慧网络科技有限公司 沪B2-20211235 沪ICP备2021021198号-6 网信算备310109445163904240019号 Copyright ©2021 KUANGHUI All Rights Reserved. 匡慧公司 版权所有